ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A comparison of chat and audio in media rich environments
Full text PdfPdf (394 KB)
Source Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work table of contents
Banff, Alberta, Canada
SESSION: The ears and eyes have it: supporting audio & video table of contents
Pages: 323 - 332  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-249-6
Authors
Jeremiah Scholl  Luleå University of Technology & Norwegian Centre for Telemedicine
John McCarthy  University College London
Rikard Harr  Umeå University
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 240,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1180875.1180925
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents two case studies of informal group communication using multimedia conferencing that supports various media including video, audio and chat. The studies provide a comparison of audio and chat as communication medium and present data on usage patterns, user preferences and attitudes. The quantitative and qualitative data collected suggest that chat does have advantages in some situations when used for informal communication along with video. The results provide evidence against the hypothesis that chat is a low bandwidth alternative only used when audio communication is unavailable. This suggests that video mediated chat deserves further attention from designers and the research community, since it is often ignored as a "useful" scenario.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Marratech AB. http://www.marratech.com
2
3
 
4
Bailey, B.P., Konstan, J.A. and Carlis, J.V., Measuring the effects of interruptions on task performance in the user interface. in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC '00), (Nashville, TN, Oct. 8-11, 2000), IEEE, 757--762.
5
 
6
 
7
Chapanis, A., Ochsman, R., Parrish, R. and Weeks, G. Studies in Interactive Communication. 1: The effects of four communication modes on the behaviour of teams during cooperative problem solving. Human Factors, 14, (1972), 487--509.
 
8
Chapanis, A., Parrish, R., Ochsman, R. and Weeks, G. Studies in Interactive Communication. II: The effects of four communication modes on the behaviour of teams during cooperative problem solving. Human Factors, 19, 2 (1977), 101--125.
 
9
Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E. and Horvitz, E., Instant Messaging and Interruption: Influence of Task Type on Performance. in Proceedings of OZCHI '00, (Sydney, Australia, Oct. 4 - 8, 2000), 356--361.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
 
18
Harr, R. and Wiberg, M. Lost in translation: Investigating the ambiguity of availability cues in an online media space. To be published in the Internation Journal Behaviour and Information Technology (BIT).
19
20
21
 
22
 
23
Kraut, R.E., Fish, R., Root, R. and Chalfonte, B. Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and technology. in Oskamp, S. and Spacapan, S. eds. Human reactions to technology: Claremont symposium on applied social psychology, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, 1990, 145--199.
24
 
25
Mee, A. The Pleasure Telephone the Strand Magazine, 1898, 339--369.
26
 
27
28
 
29
Panko, R.R. Managerial Communication Patterns. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 1 (1992), 95--122.
 
30
Parviainen, R. and Parnes, P., A Web Based History tool for Multicast e-Meeting Sessions. in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo (ICME '04), (Taipei, Taiwan, June 27 - 30, 2004), IEEE.
31
32
 
33
Short, J., Williams, E. and Christie, B. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Wiley, New York, 1976.
 
34
Tang, J.C. and Isaacs, E.A. Why do users like video? studies of multimedia-supported collaboration. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal, 1, 3 (1993), 163--196.
35
 
36
 
37
 
38
Whittaker, S. Theories and Methods in Mediated Communication. in Graesser, A., Gernsbacher, M. and Goldman, S. eds. The Handbook of Discourse Processes, Erlbaum, NJ, 2002, 243--286.
 
39
Whittaker, S. Things to talk about when talking about things. Human-Computer Interaction, 18, (2003), 149--170.
40
41
 
42
Williams, E. Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A Review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 5 (1977), 963--976.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jeremiah Scholl: colleagues
John McCarthy: colleagues
Rikard Harr: colleagues