skip to main content
10.1145/1180995.1181053acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Haptic phonemes: basic building blocks of haptic communication

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 November 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

A haptic phoneme represents the smallest unit of a constructed haptic signal to which a meaning can be assigned. These haptic phonemes can be combined serially or in parallel to form haptic words, or haptic icons, which can hold more elaborate meanings for their users. Here, we use phonemes which consist of brief (<2 seconds) haptic stimuli composed of a simple waveform at a constant frequency and amplitude. Building on previous results showing that a set of 12 such haptic stimuli can be perceptually distinguished, here we test learnability and recall of associations for arbitrarily chosen stimulus-meaning pairs. We found that users could consistently recall an arbitrary association between a haptic stimulus and its assigned arbitrary meaning in a 9-phoneme set, during a 45 minute test period following a reinforced learning stage.

References

  1. Immersion, Vibetonez. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, L. M. a. K., T. Feel who's talking: using tactons for mobile phone alerts. in CHI '06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 2006. Montréal, Québec, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Haller, R., The Display and Control Concept iDrive - Quick Access to All Driving and Comfort Functions. ATZ/MTZ Extra (The New BMW 5-Series), 2003(August): p. 51--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Day, J., Can BMW's iDrive Pass Its Road Test Now? Electronic Design, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan, A., MacLean, K., McGrenere, J. Learning and Identifying Haptic Icons Under Workload. in World Haptics. 2005. Pisa, Italy. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chan, A., Designing Haptic Icons to Support an Urgency-Based Turn-Taking Protocol,, in Computer Science. 2004, University of British Columbia: Vancouver, BC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S., Hamilton, C., Grindley, M., Feeling textures through a probe: Effects of probe and surface geometry and exploratory factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Tan, H. Z., Durlach, N. I., Reed, C. M., Rabinowitz, W. M., Information transmission with a multifinger tactual display. Percept Psychophys, 1999. 61(6): p. 993--1008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Tan, H. Z., Gray, R., Young, J. J., Traylor, R., A Haptic Back Display for Attentional and Directional Cueing. Haptics-e, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. MacLean, K., Enriquez, M. Perceptual Design of Haptic Icons. in Eurohaptics. 2003. Dublin, Ireland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Tang, A., McLachlan, P., Lowe, K., Saka, C. R. and MacLean, K. Perceiving Ordinal Data Haptically Under Workload. in Seventh International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI 2005). 2005. Trento, Italy. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Allen, M., Gluck, J., MacLean, K., Tang, E. An Initial Usability Assessment for Symbolic Haptic Rendering of Music Parameters. in ICMI 2005, 7th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces. 2005. trento, italy. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Enriquez, M., A study of haptic icons, ed. C. University of British and S. Dept. of Computer. 2002, Vancouver: University of British Columbia. xi, 119 leaves.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Pasquero, J., Luk, J., Little, S., MacLean, K. Perceptual Analysis of Haptic Icons: an Investigation into the Validity of Cluster Sorted MDS. in Haptic Symposium 2006. 2006. Washington, DC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Taylor, M. M., Creelman, C. D., PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1967. 41(4A): p. 782--787.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller, G., The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capability for processing information. Psychological Review, 1956. 63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Paulhus, D.L., Measurement and control of response bias, in Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes, P. R. S. J. P. Robinson, & L. S. Wrightsman, Editor. 1991, Academic Press: New York Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Haptic phonemes: basic building blocks of haptic communication

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICMI '06: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Multimodal interfaces
      November 2006
      404 pages
      ISBN:159593541X
      DOI:10.1145/1180995

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 November 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader