Article

Variability of throughput in pointing device tests: button-up or button-down?

Author:

Poika IsokoskiAuthors Info & Claims

NordiCHI '06: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles

Pages 68 - 77

https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182483

Published: 14 October 2006 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

Object selection and activation in graphical user interfaces is usually connected to the changes in the state of the buttons on the mouse. In input device testing the position of the mouse cursor at the time of button-down or button-up events is used. We measured the effect the choice of event has on throughput in a standard Fitts' paradigm pointing device test. 12 participants used two mice with button-down and button-up events as the target selection trigger. Button-down events produced 0.2 bps higher throughput than button-up events. Because of this, it is important to choose the relevant event to be used in pointing device tests and to report the choice along with the results. Otherwise results may be misleading and inter-study comparisons of throughput values may be inaccurate.

References

[1]

Douglas, S. A., Kirkpatrick, A. E., and MacKenzie, I. S., Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO9241, Part 9 standard, Proc. of CHI '99, ACM Press (1999), 215--222.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

Fitts, P. M., The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47 (1954), 381--391.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[3]

ISO, 9421-9 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) -- Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices, International Organization for Standardization, 2000.

Google Scholar

[4]

Isokoski, P., and Raisamo, R., Speed and accuracy of six mice. Asian Information-Science-Life, 2, 2 (2004), 131--140.

Google Scholar

[5]

MacKenzie, I. S., A note on the information-theoretic basis for Fitts' law, Journal of Motor Behavior, 21 (1989), 323--330.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[6]

MacKenzie, I. S., and Jusoh, S., An evaluation of two input devices for remote pointing. Proc. of the Eighth IFIP Working Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction - EHCI 2001. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag (2001), 235--249.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Windows User Experience: Official Guidelines for User Interface Developers and Designers, Microsoft, 1999.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[8]

Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W., The mathematical theory of communications, University of Illinois Press. 1949.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[9]

Soukoreff, R. W., and MacKenzie, I. S., Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation: Perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61, 6 (2004), 751--789.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

Zhai, S. Characterizing computer input with Fitts' law parameters - The information and non-information aspects of pointing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61, 6 (2004), 791--809.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Priya KJoshi A(2023)Fitts’ Throughput Vs Empirical Throughput: A Comparative StudyHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202310.1007/978-3-031-42280-5_28(436-455)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42280-5_28
Nieuwenhuizen KMartens J(2016)Advanced modeling of selection and steering dataInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.03.00994:C(35-52)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.03.009
Zielasko DFreitag SRausch DLaw YWeyers BKuhlen TBanic ASuma ESteinicke FStuerzlinger W(2015)BlowClickProceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/2788940.2788953(20-23)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2788940.2788953
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Variability of throughput in pointing device tests: button-up or button-down?
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

User performance with trackball-mice

Trackball-mice are devices that include both a trackball and a mouse. In this paper we discuss our experiences in building and testing trackball-mouse prototypes. We report four experiments on user performance with the prototypes used as trackball-mice, ...
Revisiting peephole pointing: a study of target acquisition with a handheld projector
MobileHCI '12: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services

Peephole pointing is a promising interaction technique for large workspaces that contain more information than can be appropriately displayed on a single screen. In peephole pointing a window to the virtual workspace is moved in space to reveal ...
Peephole pointing: modeling acquisition of dynamically revealed targets
CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Peephole interaction occurs when a spatially aware display is moved and acts as a viewport to reveal different parts of the virtual space that cannot all fit within the display at once. We investigate pointing within this peephole metaphor, where the ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

NordiCHI '06: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles

October 2006

517 pages

ISBN:1595933255

DOI:10.1145/1182475

Editors:
Anders Mørch
University of Oslo, Norway
,
Konrad Morgan
University of Bergen, Norway
,
Tone Bratteteig
University of Oslo, Norway
,
Gautam Ghosh
Userminded, Norway
,
Dag Svanaes
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 October 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

NORDICHI06

NORDICHI06: The 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

October 14 - 18, 2006

Oslo, Norway

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

7
Total Citations
View Citations
338
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)7
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Priya KJoshi A(2023)Fitts’ Throughput Vs Empirical Throughput: A Comparative StudyHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202310.1007/978-3-031-42280-5_28(436-455)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42280-5_28
Nieuwenhuizen KMartens J(2016)Advanced modeling of selection and steering dataInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.03.00994:C(35-52)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.03.009
Zielasko DFreitag SRausch DLaw YWeyers BKuhlen TBanic ASuma ESteinicke FStuerzlinger W(2015)BlowClickProceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/2788940.2788953(20-23)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2788940.2788953
Morelli TRipke T(2015)Back-Pointer — Fitts' law analysis of natural mobile camera based interactions2015 IEEE Games Entertainment Media Conference (GEM)10.1109/GEM.2015.7377208(1-6)Online publication date: Oct-2015
https://doi.org/10.1109/GEM.2015.7377208
Kissinger JMorelli T(2015)Usability of Touchpad Based Game Controller InterfacesProceedings, Part II, of the 4th International Conference on Design, User Experience, and Usability: Users and Interactions - Volume 918710.1007/978-3-319-20898-5_44(452-463)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-319-20898-5_44
Natapov DCastellucci SMacKenzie IGooch ATory M(2009)ISO 9241-9 evaluation of video game controllersProceedings of Graphics Interface 200910.5555/1555880.1555930(223-230)Online publication date: 25-May-2009
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1555880.1555930
McArthur VCastellucci SMacKenzie IGraham TCalvary GGray P(2009)An empirical comparison of "wiimote" gun attachments for pointing tasksProceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems10.1145/1570433.1570471(203-208)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2009
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1570433.1570471

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Abstract

References

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

User performance with trackball-mice

Revisiting peephole pointing: a study of target acquisition with a handheld projector

Peephole pointing: modeling acquisition of dynamically revealed targets

Comments

Information

Published In

Publisher

Publication History

Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

eReader

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations