skip to main content
10.1145/1182475.1182484acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Unipad: single stroke text entry with language-based acceleration

Published:14 October 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

A stylus-based text entry technique called Unipad is presented. Unipad combines single-stroke text input with language-based acceleration techniques, including word completion, suffix completion, and frequent word prompting. In a study with ten participants, entry rates averaged 11.6 wpm with 0.90% errors after two hours of practice. In follow-on sessions to establish the expert potential, four users entered "the quick brown fox" phrase repeatedly for four blocks of 15 minutes each. Average rates on the last block ranged from 17.1 to 35.1 wpm, with peak rates reaching 48 wpm.

References

  1. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., and Newell, A. The psychology of human-computer interaction, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Darragh, J., and Witten, I. The Reactive Keyboard, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 39 (1993), 521--528.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fleetwood, M. D., Byrne, M. D., Centgraf, P., Dudziak, K. Q., Lin, B., and Mogilev, D. An evaluation of text entry in Palm OS: Graffiti and the virtual keyboard, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Goldberg, D., and Richardson, C. Touch-typing with a stylus, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - INTERCHI '93. New York: ACM, 1993, 80--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Greenberg, S., Darragh, J. J., Maulsby, D., and Witten, I. H. Predictive interfaces: What will they think of next?, Extra-ordinary human-computer interaction: Interfaces for users with disabilities, ed. A. D. N. Edwards. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Higginbotham, D. J. Evaluation of keystroke savings across five assistive communication technologies, Augmentative and Alternative Communication 8, 258--272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Isokoski, P. Model for unistroke writing time, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -- CHI 2001. New York: ACM, 2001, 357--364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. MacKenzie, I. S. KSPC (keystrokes per character) as a characteristic of text entry techniques, Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2002, 195--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. MacKenzie, I. S., and Soukoreff, R. W. Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques, Extended Abstracts of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -- CHI 2003. New York: ACM, 2003, 754--755. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. MacKenzie, I. S., and Zhang, S. X. The immediate usability of Graffiti, Proceedings of Graphics Interface '97. Toronto: Canadian Information Processing Society, 1997, 120--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. MacKenzie, I. S., and Zhang, S. X. The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '99. New York: ACM, 1999, 25--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. MacKenzie, I. S., and Zhang, S. X. An empirical investigation of the novice experience with soft keyboards, Behaviour & Information Technology 20 (2001), 411--418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. MacKenzie, I. S., Zhang, X. I., and Soukoreff, R. W. Stylus tapping on a soft keyboard, Behaviour & Information Technology 18 (1998), 235--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Mankoff, J., Hudson, S. E., and Abowd, G. D. Interaction techniques for ambiguity resolution in recognition-based interfaces, Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology -- UIST 2000, New York: ACM, 2000) 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Masui, T. An efficient text input method for pen-based computers, Proceedings of the CHI '98 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 1998, 328--335. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Oniszczak, A. and MacKenzie, I. S. 2004. A comparison of two input methods for keypads on mobile devices. Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer interaction - NordiCHI 2004, pp. 101--104. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Soukoreff, R. W., and MacKenzie, I. S. Measuring errors in text entry tasks: An application of the Leven-shtein string distance statistic, Extended Abstracts of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -- CHI 2001. New York: ACM, 2001, 319--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Welford, A. T. Fundamentals of skill, London: Methuen, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Unipad: single stroke text entry with language-based acceleration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '06: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles
      October 2006
      517 pages
      ISBN:1595933255
      DOI:10.1145/1182475

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 October 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader