ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
SoundBar: exploiting multiple views in multimodal graph browsing
Full text PdfPdf (636 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 189 archive
Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles table of contents
Oslo, Norway
Pages: 145 - 154  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-325-5
Authors
David K. McGookin  University of Glasgow, Glasgow
Stephen A. Brewster  University of Glasgow, Glasgow
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 52,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1182475.1182491
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we discuss why access to mathematical graphs is problematic for visually impaired people. By a review of graph understanding theory and interviews with visually impaired users, we explain why current non-visual representations are unlikely to provide effective access to graphs. We propose the use of multiple views of the graph, each providing quick access to specific information as a way to improve graph usability. We then introduce a specific multiple view system to improve access to bar graphs called SoundBar which provides an additional quick audio overview of the graph. An evaluation of SoundBar revealed that additional views significantly increased accuracy and reduced time taken in a question answering task.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
Brown, L., and Brewster, S. A. Drawing by ear: Interpreting sonified line graphs. In Proceedings of ICAD 2003 (Boston, Massachusetts, 2003), ICAD, pp. 152--156.
 
4
Curcio, F. R. Comprehension of mathematical relationships expressed in graphs. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 18, 5 (1987), 382--393.
 
5
Dimigen, G., Scott, F., Thackeray, F., Pimm, M., and Roy, A. W. N. Career expectations of british visually impaired students who are of school-leaving age. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 87 (1993), 209--210.
 
6
Kosslyn, S. M. Understanding charts and graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology 3, 3 (1989), 185--226.
 
7
Lohse, G. L. Models of graphical perception. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, M. Helander, T. Landauer, and P. Prabu, Eds., 2 ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997, pp. 107--135.
 
8
Mansur, D. L. Graphs in Sound: A Numerical Data Analysis Method for the Blind. M.sc., University of California, 1985.
 
9
Miller, G. A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review 63, 1 (1956), 81--97.
 
10
Peebles, D., and Cheng, P. C. H. Modeling the effect of task and graphical representation on response latency in a graph reading task. Human Factors 45, 1 (2003), 28--46.
 
11
Pinker, S. A theory of graph comprehension. In Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Testing, R. Freedle, Ed. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1990, pp. 73--126.
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
Walker, B. N., and Cothran, J. T. Sonification sandbox: A graphical toolkit for auditory graphs. In ICAD 2003 (Boston, MA, 2003), ICAD, pp. 161--163.
17
 
18
Woods, D. D., Patterson, E. S., and Roth, E. M. Can we ever escape from data overload? a cognitive systems diagnosis. Cognition, Technology and Work 4 (2002), 22--36.
 
19
Yu, W., and Brewster, S. A. Evaluation of multimodal graphs for blind people. Journal of Universal Access in the Information Society 2, 2 (2003), 105--124.


Collaborative Colleagues:
David K. McGookin: colleagues
Stephen A. Brewster: colleagues