Analyzing theme, space, and time: an ontology-based approach

ABSTRACT

The W3C's Semantic Web Activity is illustrating the use of semantics for information integration, search, and analysis. However, the majority of the work in this community has focused more on the thematic aspects of information and has paid less attention to its spatial and temporal dimensions. In this paper, we present an integrative ontology-based framework incorporating the thematic, spatial, and temporal dimensions of information. This framework is built around the RDF metadata model. Our ultimate goal is to provide an information system which allows searching and analysis of relationships in any or all of the three dimensions of space, time, and theme. Toward this end, we present an upper-level ontology combining concepts and relationships from both the thematic and spatial dimensions and show how to incorporate temporal semantics into this ontology. We also introduce the notion of a thematic context linking entities of differing dimensions and define a set of query operators built upon these contexts.

REFERENCES

• 1: Agarwal, P. Ontological considerations in GIScience. Int'l Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19, 5 (May 2005), 501--536.
• 2: Boanerges Aleman-Meza , Meenakshi Nagarajan , Cartic Ramakrishnan , Li Ding , Pranam Kolari , Amit P. Sheth , I. Budak Arpinar , Anupam Joshi , Tim Finin, Semantic analytics on social networks: experiences in addressing the problem of conflict of interest detection, Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, May 23-26, 2006, Edinburgh, Scotland [doi>10.1145/1135777.1135838]
• 3: James F. Allen, Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals, Communications of the ACM, v.26 n.11, p.832-843, Nov. 1983 [doi>10.1145/182.358434]
• 4: Kemafor Anyanwu , Amit Sheth, Ρ-Queries: enabling querying for semantic associations on the semantic web, Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web, May 20-24, 2003, Budapest, Hungary [doi>10.1145/775152.775249]
• 5: Bateman, J. and Farrar, S. Spatial ontology baseline. SFB/TR8 internal report I1-{OntoSpace}:D2, Collaborative Research Center for Spatial Cognition, University of Bremen, Germany, 2004.
• 6: Grady Booch, Object oriented design with applications, Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, CA, 1990
• 7: Max J. Egenhofer, Toward the semantic geospatial web, Proceedings of the 10th ACM international symposium on Advances in geographic information systems, p.1-4, November 08-09, 2002, McLean, Virginia, USA [doi>10.1145/585147.585148]
• 8: Fonseca, F.T., Egenhofer, M.J., Agouris, P. and Camara, G. Using Ontologies for Integrated Geographic Information Systems. Transactions in GIS, 6, 3 (June 2002), 231--257.
• 9: Grenon, P. and Smith, B. SNAP and SPAN: Towards Dynamic Spatial Ontology. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 4, 1 (2004). 69--104.
• 10: Gutierrez, C., Hurtado, C. and Vaisman, A. Temporal RDF. In Proceedings of the European Conference on the Semantic Web (ESWC '05), Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 2005.
• 11: Jones, C.B., Abdelmonty, A.I., Finch, D., Fu, G. and Vaid, S. The SPIRIT Spatial Search Engine: Architecture, Ontologies, and Spatial Indexing. In Proceedings of the Third Int'l Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIS '04), Adelphi, MD, USA, 2004.
• 12: Kolas, D., Hebeler, J. and Dean, M. Geospatial Semantic Web: Architecture of Ontologies. In Proceedings of the First Int'l Conference on GeoSpatial Semantics (GEOS '05), Mexico City, Mexico, 2005.
• 13: Ladkin, P.B. The logic of time representation, University of California at Berkley, Berkley, CA, 1987.
• 14: Mukherjea, S. and Bamba, B. BioPatentMiner: An Information Retrieval System for BioMedical Patents. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Int'l Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB '04), Toronto, Canada, 2004.
• 15: Nikos Pelekis , Babis Theodoulidis , Ioannis Kopanakis , Yannis Theodoridis, Literature review of spatio-temporal database models, The Knowledge Engineering Review, v.19 n.3, p.235-274, September 2004 [doi>10.1017/S026988890400013X]
• 16: RDF. http://www.w3.org/RDF/.
• 17: SemanticWeb. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/
• 18: Sheth, A.P., Arpinar, I.B. and Kashyap, V. Relationships at the Heart of Semantic Web: Modeling, Discovering and Exploiting Complex Semantic Relationships. in Nikravesh, M., Azvin, B., Yager, R. and Zadeh, L.A. eds. Enhancing the Power of the Internet Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Springer-Verlag, 2003.
• 19: Extensible Indexing: a Framework for Integrating Domain-Specific Indexing Schemes into Oracle8i, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Data Engineering, p.91, February 28-March 03, 2000
• 20: Charalampos I. Theodoulidis , Pericles Loucopoulos, The time dimension in conceptual modelling, Information Systems, v.16 n.3, p.273-300, 1991 [doi>10.1016/0306-4379(91)90002-Q]
• 21: Worboys, M. and Hornsby, K. From Objects to Events: GEM, the Geospatial Event Model. In Proceedings of the Third Int'l Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIS '04), Adelphi, MD, USA, 2004.
• 22: Yuan, M. Modeling Semantical, Temporal and Spatial Information in Geographic Information Systems. in Craglia, M. and Couclelis, H. eds. Geographic Information Research: Bridging the Atlantic, Taylor & Francis, 1996, 334--347.
• 23: Yuan, M. Wildfire Conceptual Modeling for Building GIS Space-Time Models. In Proceedings of GIS/LIS, Pheonix, AZ, 1994.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.2 DATABASE MANAGEMENT
      H.2.1 Logical Design
          Subjects: Data models

General Terms:
Design

Keywords:
RDF, data modeling, domain ontology, ontology, spatial ontology, spatial relationships, spatio-temporal-thematic querying, temporal ontology, temporal relationships