skip to main content
10.1145/1183614.1183625acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Movie review mining and summarization

Published:06 November 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the flourish of the Web, online review is becoming a more and more useful and important information resource for people. As a result, automatic review mining and summarization has become a hot research topic recently. Different from traditional text summarization, review mining and summarization aims at extracting the features on which the reviewers express their opinions and determining whether the opinions are positive or negative. In this paper, we focus on a specific domain - movie review. A multi-knowledge based approach is proposed, which integrates WordNet, statistical analysis and movie knowledge. The experimental results show the effectiveness of the proposed approach in movie review mining and summarization.

References

  1. Philip Beineke, Trevor Hastie, Christopher Manning and Shivakumar Vaithyanathan. An exploration of sentiment summarization. In Proceedings of AAAI 2003, pp.12--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Pimwadee Chaovalit and Lina Zhou. Movie review mining: A comparison between supervised and unsupervised classification approaches. In Proceedings of HICSS 2005, vol.4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Kushal Dave, Steve Lawrence and David M. Pennock. Mining the peanut gallery: Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In Proceedings of WWW 2005, pp.519--528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Michael Gamon, Anthony Aue, Simon Corston-Oliver and Eric Ringger. Pulse: Mining customer opinions from free text. In Proceedings of IDA 2005, pp.121--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou and Kathleen R. McKeown. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In Proceedings of ACL 1997, pp.174--181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Minqing Hu and Bing Liu. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of ACM-KDD 2004, pp.168--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Kamps and M. Marx. Words with attitude. In Proc. of the First International Conference on Global WordNet, pp.332--341.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bing Liu, Minqing Hu and Junsheng Cheng. Opinion Observer: Analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. In Proceedings of WWW 2005, pp.342--351. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Tony Mullen and Nigel Collier. Sentiment analysis using support vector machines with diverse information sources. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2004, pp.412--418.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Charles E. Osgood, George J. Succi and Percy H.Tannenbaum. The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bo Pang, Lillian Lee and Shivakumar Vaithyanathan. Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2002, pp.79--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In Proceedings of ACL 2004, pp.271--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In Proceedings of ACL 2005, pp.115--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ana-Maria Popescu and Oren Etzioni. Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2005, pp.339--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ellen Riloff, Janyce Webie and Theresa Wilson. 2003. Learning subjective nouns using extraction pattern bootstrapping. In Proceedings of CoNLL 2003, pp.25--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ellen Riloff and Janyce Wiebe. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2003, pp.105--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Philip J. Stone, Dexter C. Dunphy, Marshall S. Smith and Daniel M. Ogilvie. The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Peter D. Turney. Thumbs up or thumbs down: Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of ACL 2002, pp.417--424. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Peter D. Turney and Michael L. Littman. Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Trans. on Information Systems, 2003, 21(4), pp.315--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Janyce Wiebe. Learning subjective adjectives from corpora. In Proceedings of AAAI 2000, pp.735--740. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Janyce Wiebe and Ellen Riloff. Creating subjective and objective sentence classifiers from un-annotated texts. In Proceedings of CICLing 2005, pp.486--497. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hong Yu and Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou. Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2003, pp.129--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Movie review mining and summarization

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CIKM '06: Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
        November 2006
        916 pages
        ISBN:1595934332
        DOI:10.1145/1183614

        Copyright © 2006 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 November 2006

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader