skip to main content
10.1145/1185347.1185368acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesancsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Localized asynchronous packet scheduling for buffered crossbar switches

Published:03 December 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Buffered crossbar switches are a special type of crossbar switches. In such a switch, besides normal input queues and output queues, a small buffer is associated with each crosspoint. Due to the introduction of crosspoint buffers, output and input contention is eliminated, and the scheduling process for buffered crossbar switches is greatly simplified. Moreover, crosspoint buffers enable the switch to work in an asynchronous mode and easily schedule and transmit variable length packets. Compared with fixed length packet scheduling or cell scheduling, variable length packet scheduling, or packet scheduling for short, has some unique advantages: higher throughput, shorter packet latency and lower hardware cost. In this paper, we present a fast and practical scheduling scheme for buffered crossbar switches called Localized Asynchronous Packet Scheduling (LAPS). With LAPS, an input port or output port makes scheduling decisions solely based on the state information of its local crosspoint buffers, i.e., the crosspoint buffers where the input port sends packets to or the output port retrieves packets from. The localization property makes LAPS suitable for a distributed implementation and thus highly scalable. Since no comparison operation is required in LAPS, scheduling arbiters can be efficiently implemented using priority encoders, which can make arbitration decisions quickly in hardware. Another advantage of LAPS is that each crosspoint needs only L (the maximum packet length) buffer space, which minimizes the hardware cost of the switches. We also theoretically analyze the performance of LAPS, and in particular we prove that LAPS achieves 100% throughput for any admissible traffic with speedup of two. Finally, simulations are conducted to verify the analytical results and measure the performance of LAPS.

References

  1. A. Demers, S. Keshav and S. Shenker, "Analysis and simulation of a fair queueing algorithm," ACM SIGCOMM '89, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 3--12, Austin, TX, Sept. 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Shreedhar and G. Varghese, "Efficient fair queuing using deficit round robin," IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 375--385, Jun. 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Pan and Y. Yang, "Credit based fair scheduling for packet switched networks," Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM 2005, pp. 843--854, Miami, FL, March 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. T. Anderson, S. Owicki. J. Saxe and C. Thacker, "High-speed switch scheduling for local-area networks," ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 319--352, Nov. 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N. McKeown, "The iSLIP scheduling algorithm for input-queued switches," IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 188--201, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H. J. Chao, "Saturn: A terabit packet switch using dual round-robin," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 78--84, Dec. 2000 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. N. McKeown, A. Mekkittikul, V. Anantharam and J. Walrand, "Achieving 100% throughput in an input queued switch," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1260--1267, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. G. Dai and B. Prabhakar, "The throughput of data switches with and without speedup," IEEE INFOCOM '00, vol. 2, pp. 556--564, Tel Aviv, Israel, Mar. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Pan and Y. Yang, "Pipelined two step iterative matching algorithms for CIOQ crossbar switches," Proc. of ACM/IEEE Symposium on Architectures for Networking and Communications Systems (ANCS), Oct. 2005, Princeton, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. J. Karol, M. J. Hluchyj and S. P. Morgan, "Input versus output queueing on a space-division packet switch," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 35, pp. 1347--1356, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. N. McKeown, "A fast switched backplane for a gigabit switched router," Business Communications Review, vol. 27, no. 12, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Turner, "Strong performance guarantees for asynchronous crossbar schedulers," Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM 2006, Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Xu and R. Lipton, "On fundamental tradeoffs between delay bounds and computational complexity in packet scheduling algorithms", ACM SIGCOMM'2002, Pittsburgh, PA, Aug. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Morris Mano, Digital Design, 3rd edition, Prentice Hall, Aug. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. I. Stoica and H. Zhang, "Exact emulation of an output queueing switch by a combined input output queueing switch," IEEE IWQoS'98, pp. 218--224, Napa, California, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S.-T. Chuang, A. Goel, N. McKeown and B. Prabhkar, "Matching output queueing with a combined input output queued switch," IEEE INFOCOM'99, pp. 1169--1178, New York, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. Stephens and H. Zhang, "Implementing distributed packet fair queueing in a scalable switch architecture," IEEE INFOCOM '98, pp. 282--290, San Francisco, CA, March 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Rojas-Cessa, E. Oki, Z. Jing and H. J. Chao, "CIXB-1: Combined input-once-cell-crosspoint buffered switch," IEEE Workshop on High Performance Switching and RoutinG, Dallas, TX, July 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Rojas-Cessa, E. Oki and H. J. Chao, "CIXOB-k: Combined input-crosspoint-output buffered packet switch," IEEE Globecom'01, San Antonio, Texas, Nov. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. L. Mhamdi and M. Hamdi, "MCBF: a high-performance scheduling algorithm for buffered crossbar switches," IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 451--453, Sept. 2003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. X. Zhang and L. Bhuyan, "An efficient scheduling algorithm for combined-input-crosspoint-queued (CICQ) switches," IEEE Globecom 2004, Dallas, TX, Nov. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. L. Mhamdi and M. Hamdi, "Output queued switch emulation by a one-cell-internally buffered crossbar switch," IEEE GLOBECOM 2003, vol. 7, pp. 3688-3693, San Francisco, CA, Dec. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Chuang, S. Iyer and N. McKeown, "Practical algorithms for performance guarantees in buffered crossbars," Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM 2005, Miami, FL, March 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. B. Magill, C. Rohrs and R. Stevenson, "Output-queued switch emulation by fabrics with limited memory," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol 21, no. 4, pp. 606--615, May 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. Katevenis, G. Passas, D. Simos, I. Papaefstathiou and N. Chrysos, "Variable packet size buffered crossbar (CICQ) switches," Proc. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2004), vol. 2, pp. 1090--1096, Paris, France, June 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. M. Katevenis and G. Passas, "Variable-size multipacket segments in buffered crossbar (CICQ) architectures," Proc. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2005), Seoul, Korea, May 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. J. Hopcroft and R. Karp, "An N5/2 algorithm for maximum matching in bipartite graphs," SIAM Journal of Computing, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 225--231, Dec. 1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. R. Tarjan, "Data structures and network algorithms," CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, Dec. 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. S. Ramabhadran, J. Pasquale, "Stratified round robin: a low complexity packet scheduler with bandwidth fairness and bounded delay," HACM SIGCOMM '03, pp. 239--250, Karlsruhe, Germany, Aug. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Localized asynchronous packet scheduling for buffered crossbar switches

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ANCS '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE symposium on Architecture for networking and communications systems
      December 2006
      202 pages
      ISBN:1595935800
      DOI:10.1145/1185347

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 December 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate88of314submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader