skip to main content
10.1145/1188835.1188845acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplashConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Proof general in Eclipse: system and architecture overview

Published:22 October 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Interactive theorem proving is the art of constructing electronic proofs. Proof development, based around a proof script, has much in common with program development, based around a program text. Proof developers use rather primitive tools for developing and manipulating proof scripts at present. The Proof General project aims at to change this, by providing powerful generic tools and interfaces. The flagship tool is our Eclipse plugin, which brings the features of a industrial-strength IDE to theorem proving for the first time. In this paper we give an overview of the Eclipse plugin and its underlying architecture.

References

  1. D. Aspinall and C. Lüth. Commentary on PGIP. http://proofgeneral.inf.ed.ac.uk/kit/, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D. Aspinall, C. Lüth, and D. Winterstein. Parsing, editing, proving: The PGIP display protocol. In User Interfaces for Theorem Provers UITP'05, Apr. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Aspinall, C. Lüth, and B. Wolff. Assisted proof document authoring. In Proc. Intl. conf. Mathematical Knowledge Management 2005, LNAI 3863. Springer, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. Aydemir, A. Bohannon, M. Fairbairn, J. Foster, B. Pierce, P. Sewell, D. Vytiniotis, G. Washburn, S. Weirich, and S. Zdancewic. Mechanized metatheory for the masses: The POPLmark challenge, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Y. Bertot and L. Théry. A generic approach to building user interfaces for theorem provers. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 25(7):161--194, Feb. 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. G. Gonthier. A computer-checked proof of the four colour theorem. Technical report, Microsoft Research Cambridge, 2004. http://research. microsoft.com/~gonthier/4colproof.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T. C. Hales. The Flyspeck project page. http://www.math.pitt.edu/~thales/flyspeck/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Kaivola and K. R. Kohatsu. Proof engineering in the large: formal verification of Pentium 4 floating-point divider. STTT, 4(3):323--334, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Kohlhase. OMDoc: An Open Markup Format for Mathematical Documents. LNAI 4180. Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. TeXmacs. Web page, 2006. http://www.texmacs.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. von Oheimb. Hoare logic for Java in Isabelle/HOL. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 13(13):1173--1214, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mathematical markup language (MathML). W3C Recommendation, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Wenzel. Isabelle/Isar --- a versatile environment for human-readable formal proof documents. PhD thesis, Technische Universität München, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Proof general in Eclipse: system and architecture overview

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              eclipse '06: Proceedings of the 2006 OOPSLA workshop on eclipse technology eXchange
              October 2006
              93 pages
              ISBN:1595936211
              DOI:10.1145/1188835

              Copyright © 2006 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 22 October 2006

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              eclipse '06 Paper Acceptance Rate17of30submissions,57%Overall Acceptance Rate38of79submissions,48%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader