Public involvement in technology policy: focus on the pervasive computing environment

Abstract

This paper examines the role of the general public in informing technology policy, observing that public involvement often occurs only through the electoral process or via feedback after plans have been implemented. Planners and policymakers are not necessarily in touch with the feelings and desires of the public who will be affected by their decisions. For this reason it is important to seek a clearer understanding of the views of citizens who are not typically involved in the planning or design process in order to guide the evolution of technology, as well as to highlight areas where there may be some discrepancy between planners and the needs of everyday users. To broaden the inputs into discussion of emerging problems related to pervasive computing in the State of Hawaii, both information and communication technology specialists (including government policy makers) and members of the general population were invited to participate in a multi-phase study. Differences in perception between specialists and the general public were identified in all phases of research. Specialists were identified as being more focused on near-term issues related to barriers affecting the growth of high-technology industries within the State. Non-specialists showed greater concern for "human" issues, including issues related to the control of technology. Importantly, both groups independently described a need for increased public participation in the process of technological development. Analysis also revealed that both groups found the problem statements generated by non-specialists to be valuable contributions, arguing for their inclusion in the process of problem identification and further supporting the use of participatory planning methods.

References

1. M. Weiser, "The computer for the twenty-first century," Scientific American, vol. 265, pp. 94--101, September 1991.
2. M. Weiser and J. S. Brown, "The coming age of calm technology," in Beyond Calculation: the Next Fifty Years of Computing, R. Metcalfe and P. Denning, Eds., New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 75--85, 1997.
3. D. Saha and A. Mukherjee, "Pervasive Computing: a paradigm for the 21st Century," IEEE Computer, vol. 36, pp. 25--31, March 2003.
4. J. M. Kahn, R. H. Katz and K. S. Pister, "Mobile networking for Smart Dust," IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Seattle, WA, 1999.
5. M. Satyanarayanan, "Pervasive Computing: vision and challenges," IEEE Personal Communications, vol. 8, pp. 10--17, August 2001.
6. R. E. Sclove, "Town meetings on technology," Technology Review, vol. 99, pp. 24--31, July 1996.
7. B. A. Nardi and V. L. O'Day, Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999, p.14.
8. J. C. Glenn, "Participatory methods," in Futures Research Methodology, J. C. Glenn and T. J. Gordon, Eds., Washington, D.C.: American Council for the United Nations University, Millennium Project, 1996.
9. The Danish Board of Technology, "Consensus Conference," October, 2002, http://www.tekno.dk
10. I.-E. Andersen and B. Jaeger, "Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: towards more democratic decision-making," Science and Public Policy, vol. 26, pp. 331--340, October 1999.
11. W. Bell, Foundations of Future Studies: Human Science for a New Era, Vol. 2, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1997.
12. J. Dator. "Futures studies as applied knowledge," in: New Thinking for a New Millennium, R. A. Slaughter, Ed., New York: Routledge, 1996, pp. 105--115.
13. J. S. Winter, Early Identification and Evaluation of Emerging Problems Related to Ubiquitous Networked Computing & Communications in the State of Hawaii, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2003.
14. J. S. Winter. "Ubiquitous Computing and human evolution: visions of the future." Paper in submission, 2005.
15. Union of International Associations. Section 1.2 -- "Significance: constraints on a problem-focused approach," in Encyclopedia of World Problems and Human Potential. Brussels: Union of International Associations, 2001. http://www.uia.org/uiapubs/pubency.htm
16. J. C. Glenn, "Participatory methods," in Futures Research Methodology, J. C. Glenn and T. J. Gordon, Eds., Washington, D.C.: American Council for the United Nations University, Millennium Project, 1996.
17. R. E. Sclove, "Town meetings on technology," Technology Review, vol. 99, pp. 24--31, July 1996
18. D. J. Wedemeyer, R. Ono, and J. Winter, "Describing and reducing global telecommunications problems," in Pacific Telecommunications Council Conference Proceedings, 2001.
19. U. Beck, "Politics of risk society," in The Politics of Risk Society, J. Frankind, Ed., Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1998, pp. 9--22.
20. A. Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1990, p. 151.
21. B. A. Nardi and V. L. O'Day, Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999, p. 24.
22. R. E. Sclove, Democracy and Technology. New York: Guilford Press, 1995, p. 241.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Computing / technology policy