skip to main content
10.1145/1216262.1216275acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Questions of ethics: participatory information systems research in community settings

Published: 09 October 2006 Publication History

Abstract

It is generally considered the ethical option to consult with the end users and other stakeholders when developing business Information Systems or conducting research in the IS discipline, whether with the express intention of empowering them or simply to include multiple points of view. This is also the 'smart' option as it is a way to improve the probability that the system will be useful, usable, and hence used. There are significant similarities between participants who are employees in an organisation for whom the system is being developed or researched and the case where the system is intended to benefit the public and hence the participants are members of civil society. However, there are ethical concerns regarding participatory research in IS that are more pronounced or have somewhat different aspects in community-based IS than in business IS. Conventional social science research ethics include codes which are largely based on four principles: informed consent; absence of deception; privacy and confidentiality, and; accuracy. However, as most of the literature on participatory research is westernised and based on traditional business IS, there is little discussion on ethical participation in community settings. Numerous different issues arise in such settings and are discussed in the paper. These include the need: to clearly define the roles and functions of the participants; to understand the nature of power sharing between participants; to take cognisance of the cost versus gains from participation; to be aware of domination in decision making; to understand local meaning; to develop the capacity to participate, and; to consider divergent expectations of participants. The previous experience of both authors support these arguments and discussion in this paper, but the objective of the paper is to present a conceptual research methodology discussion rather than an empirical research paper

References

[1]
Adman, P. & Warren, L. 2000. Participatory sociotechnical design of organizations and information systems - an adaptation of ETHICS methodology. Journal of Information Technology, 15, pp. 39--41.
[2]
Asaro, P. M. 2000. Transforming society by transforming technology: The science and politics of participatory design. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 10, pp. 257--290.
[3]
Byrne, E. 2005. Addressing the vulnerability of children through Information Systems: A South African case study, South African Computer Journal, 35. pp. 38--47.
[4]
Byrne, E. 2004. Development through communicative action and information system design: A case study from South Africa. South African Computer Journal, 32, pp. 25--33.
[5]
Byrne, E. & Sahay, S. 2003. Health Information Systems for primary health care: Thinking about participation. In M. Korpela, R. Montealegre, and A. Poulymenakou, editors, Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 & TC9/WG 8.2 & WG 9.4 Working Conference on Organizational Information Systems in the Context of Globalization, In-Progress Research Papers, Athens, Greece, pp. 237--249.
[6]
Chambers, R. 1999. Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. Intermediate Technology Publications
[7]
Christians, C. 2005. Ethics and Politics in Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 139--164.
[8]
Cleaver, F. 2002. Institutions, Agency and the Limitations of Participatory Approaches to Development. In B. Cooke and U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The New Tyranny, Zed books, New York, pp. 36--55.
[9]
Cornwall, A. 1996. Towards participatory practice: Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) and the participatory process. In Koning, K. de and M. Martin (Eds.), Participatory Research in Health: Issues and Experiences, Zed Books, London
[10]
Denzin, N. K., 2005. Emancipatory discourse and the ethics and politics of interpretation. In N. K. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, ch. 37, pp. 933--958.
[11]
Ehn, P., 1993. Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill. In Douglas Schuler and Namioka, (Eds.), Participatory Design: Principles and Practice, Laurence Erlbaum, chapter 4, pp. 41--77.
[12]
Fitzgerald, B., Russo, N. L. & Stolterman, E. 2002. Information Systems Development: Methods in Action. McGraw-Hill, London.
[13]
Francis, P. 2002. Participatory Development at the World Bank: the Primacy of Process. In B. Cooke and U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The New Tyranny, Zed books, New York, pp. 72--87.
[14]
Guijt, I. 1998. Participatory monitoring and impact assessment of sustainable agriculture initiatives, SARL Discussion Paper No. 1, IIED, London, UK
[15]
Guijt, I., Arevalo, M. & Saladores, K. 1998. Tracking change together. PLA Notes, 31(1), pp. 28--36, February.
[16]
Jarvenpaa, S. L. & Shaw, T. R. 1998. Global virtual teams: integrating models of trust. In Sieber, P. & Griese, J. (Eds.), Organizational Virtualness Proceedings of the V O Net - Workshop, April, 1998. Bern: Simowa Verlag.
[17]
Jones, M. 1997. Structuration and IS. In W. L. Currie and R. D. Galliers, editors, Re-Thinking Management Information Systems, Oxford University Press, chapter 5, pp. 103--135.
[18]
Jonsson, U. 2000. Regional Director's Presentation at the Second Regular Session of UNICEF's Executive Board. UNICEF East and Southern African Office (ESARO), 18--20 September 2000.
[19]
Kanungo, S. 2004. On the emancipatory role of rural information systems. Information Technology and People, 17(4), pp. 407--422.
[20]
Klein, H. & Meyers, M. 1999. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly, 23 (1), pp. 67--94.
[21]
Lamb, R. & Kling, R. 2003. Reconceptualizing users as social actors in Information Systems Research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27 (2), pp. 197--235.
[22]
Lehmann, U., Blom, W., Dlanjwa, M., Fikeni, L., Hewana, N., Madlavu, N., Makaula, V., Pennacchini, M., Seal, S., Sivuku, T. & Snyman, K., 2004. Capacity development through reflective practice and collaborative research among clinic supervisors in rural South Africa-a case study. Education for Health, 17(1), pp. 53--61.
[23]
Longford, G. 2005. Community networking and civic participation: A Canadian perspective. In Proceedings of the Community Informatics Research Network 2005, Cape Town, 2005.
[24]
Mda, Z. 1993. When People Play People. Development Communication Through Theatre. Zed Books, London.
[25]
Madon, S. and Sahay, S. 2002. An information-based model of NGO mediation for the empowerment of slum dwellers in Bangalore. The Information Society, 18(1), pp. 13--19.
[26]
Mumford, E. 1999. Routinisation, re-engineering, and socio-technical design: Changing ideas on the organization of work. In Currie, W. L. & Galliers, B. (Eds.), Rethinking Management Information Systems. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 28--44.
[27]
Mumford, E. 1984. Participation - from Aristotle to today. In T. Bemelmans (Ed.), Beyond Productivity: Information Systems Development for Organisational Effectiveness, pp. 95--104, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., North-Holland Press.
[28]
Pozze\bon, M. 2004. Conducting and evaluating critical interpretive research: Examining criteria as a key component in building a research tradition. In Information Systems Research: Relevant Theory and Informed Practice, Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 conference, Manchester, pp. 275--292.
[29]
Punch, M. 1994. Politics and ethics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin $ Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 83--97
[30]
Puri, S., Byrne, E., Nhampossa, J. L. & Quraishi, Z. 2004. Contextuality of participation in IS design - a developing country perspective. In proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC), Toronto, 2004.
[31]
Puri, S. 2003. The Challenges of Participation and Knowledge in GIS Implementation for Land Management: Case Studies from India. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo
[32]
Reason, P. 1999. Integrating action and reflection through co-operative inquiry. Management Learning, 30(2), pp. 207--226.
[33]
Sahay, S. & Avgerou, C. 2002. Introducing the special issue on Information and Communication Technologies in developing countries. The Information Society, 18, pp. 73--76.
[34]
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
[35]
Slim, H. & Thompson, P. 1993. Listening for a change: oral testimony and development, PANOS.
[36]
Sin, C. H. 2005. Seeking informed consent: Reflections on research practice. Sociology, 39 (2), pp. 277--294.
[37]
Walsham, G. 2003. Development, global futures and IS research. In M. Korpela, R. Montealegre, and A. Poulymenakou, editors, Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 & TC9/WG 8.2 & WG 9.4 Working Conference on Organizational Information Systems in the Context of Globalization, In-Progress Research Papers, Athens, Greece, pp.13--22.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Questions of ethics: participatory information systems research in community settings

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SAICSIT '06: Proceedings of the 2006 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countries
    October 2006
    276 pages
    ISBN:1595935673

    Publisher

    South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists

    South Africa

    Publication History

    Published: 09 October 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. community informatics
    2. ethics
    3. participatory design
    4. participatory research
    5. research methods
    6. social development

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    SAICSIT '06
    SAICSIT '06: IT research in developing countries
    October 9 - 11, 2006
    Somerset West, South Africa

    Acceptance Rates

    SAICSIT '06 Paper Acceptance Rate 29 of 61 submissions, 48%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 187 of 439 submissions, 43%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A Review of the Consent Management LiteratureInformation10.3390/info1502007915:2(79)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2024
    • (2023)Design PracticesFeminist AI10.1093/oso/9780192889898.003.0021(370-388)Online publication date: 23-Nov-2023
    • (2021)Skid Row Power Now!C&T '21: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Wicked Problems in the Age of Tech10.1145/3461564.3461595(121-127)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2021
    • (2020)Advancing Asset-Based Practice: Engagement, Ownership, and Outcomes in Participatory DesignThe Design Journal10.1080/14606925.2020.185705024:2(253-275)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2020
    • (2017)Mobile Voices: Design as a method to explore the possibilities and limitations of community participationMobile Media & Communication10.1177/20501579177378126:2(247-265)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2017
    • (2016)Participatory Ethnographic Evaluation and Research: Reflections on the Research Approach Used to Understand the Complexity of Maternal Health Issues in South SudanQualitative Health Research10.1177/104973231667397527:9(1345-1358)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2016
    • (2014)Incentivizing Participatory Sensing via Auction MechanismsOpportunistic Mobile Social Networks10.1201/b17231-13(339-375)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2014
    • (2014)Ethics in health promoting PDProceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 110.1145/2661435.2661449(91-100)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2014
    • (2012)Participatory personal data: An emerging research challenge for the information sciencesJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2265563:10(1905-1915)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2012
    • (2011)The Criticality of an ICT Ethics Backbone for Transformation and Social Equality in E-LearningHandbook of Research on Transformative Online Education and Liberation10.4018/978-1-60960-046-4.ch025(439-460)Online publication date: 2011
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media