skip to main content
10.5555/1218112.1218160acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Monitoring variability of autocorrelated processes using standardized time series variance estimators

Published: 03 December 2006 Publication History

Abstract

We consider the problem of monitoring variability of autocorrelated processes. This paper combines variance estimation techniques from the simulation literature with a statistical process control chart from statistical process control (SPC) literature. The proposed SPC method does not require any assumptions on the distribution of the underlying process and uses a variance estimate from each batch as a basic observation. The control limits of the chart are determined analytically. The proposed chart is tested using stationary processes with both normal and non-normal marginals.

References

[1]
Alexopoulos, C., D. Goldsman, and R. F. Serfozo. 2005. Stationary processes: statistical estimation. In The Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, ed. N. L. Johnson, and C. B. Read, 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[2]
Billingsley, P. 1968. Convergence of probability measures. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[3]
Chiu, C. C., M.-K. Chen, and K.-M. Lee. 2001. Shifts recognition in correlated process data using a neural network. International Journal of Systems Science 32:137--143.
[4]
Cook, D. F., and C. C. Chiu. 1998. Using radial basis function neural networks to recognize shifts in correlated manufacturing process parameters. IIE Transactions 30:227--234.
[5]
Cook, D. F., C. W. Zobel, and Q. J. Nottingham. 2001. Utilization of neural networks for the recognition of variance shifts in correlated manufacturing process parameters. International Journal of Production Research 39:3881--3887.
[6]
Goldsman, D., K. Kang, and A. F. Seila. 1999. Craméer-von Mises variance estimators for simulations. Operations Research 47:299--309.
[7]
Johnson, R. A., and M. Bagshaw. 1974. The effect of serial correlation on the performance of CUSUM tests. Technometrics 16:103--112.
[8]
Kim, S.-H. 2006. Distribution-free SPC methods for monitoring variability of autocorrelated processes. Technical Report, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
[9]
Kim, S.-H., C. Alexopoulos, D. Goldsman, and K.-L. Tsui. 2006a. A model-free CuSum procedure for autocorrelated processes. Technical Report, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
[10]
Kim, S.-H., C. Alexopoulos, K.-L. Tsui, and J. R. Wilson. 2006b. A distribution-free tabular CUSUM chart for autocorrelated data. IIE Transactions, forthcoming.
[11]
Lada, E. K., and J. R. Wilson. 2005. A wavelet-based spectral procedure for steady-state simulation analysis. To appear in European Journal of Operational Research.
[12]
Lu, C.-W., and M. R. Reynolds, Jr. 1999. Control charts for monitoring the mean and variance of autocorrelated processes. Journal of Quality Technology 31:25--274.
[13]
Reynolds, M. R., Jr. and C.-W. Lu. 1997. Control charts for monitoring processes with autocorrelated Data. Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods, and Applications 30:4059--4067.
[14]
Runger, G. C. and T. R. Willemain. 1995. Model-based and model-free control of autocorrelated processes. Journal of Quality Technology 27:283--292.
[15]
Shapiro, S. S., and M. B. Wilk. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591--611.
[16]
Schmeiser, B. W., and W. T. Song. 1989. Inversetransformation algorithms for some common stochastic processes. In Proceedings of the 1989 Winter Simulation conference, ed. E. A. MacNair, K. J. Musselman, and P. Heidelberger, 490--496.
[17]
Schruben, L. W. 1983. Confidence interval estimation using standardized time series. Operations Research 31:1090--1108.
[18]
von Neumann, J. 1941. Distribution of the ratio of the mean square successive difference to the variance. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 12:367--395.
[19]
Yashchin, E. 1993. Performance of CUSUM control schemes for serially correlated observations. Technometrics 35:37--52.
  1. Monitoring variability of autocorrelated processes using standardized time series variance estimators

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WSC '06: Proceedings of the 38th conference on Winter simulation
    December 2006
    2429 pages
    ISBN:1424405017

    Sponsors

    • IIE: Institute of Industrial Engineers
    • ASA: American Statistical Association
    • IEICE ESS: Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Engineering Sciences Society
    • IEEE-CS\DATC: The IEEE Computer Society
    • SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
    • NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology
    • (SCS): The Society for Modeling and Simulation International
    • INFORMS-CS: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences-College on Simulation

    Publisher

    Winter Simulation Conference

    Publication History

    Published: 03 December 2006

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    WSC06
    Sponsor:
    • IIE
    • ASA
    • IEICE ESS
    • IEEE-CS\DATC
    • SIGSIM
    • NIST
    • (SCS)
    • INFORMS-CS
    WSC06: Winter Simulation Conference 2006
    December 3 - 6, 2006
    California, Monterey

    Acceptance Rates

    WSC '06 Paper Acceptance Rate 177 of 252 submissions, 70%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 3,413 of 5,075 submissions, 67%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 175
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media