skip to main content
10.5555/1218112.1218289acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A data-integrated nurse activity simulation model

Published: 03 December 2006 Publication History

Abstract

This research develops a data-integrated approach for constructing simulation models based on a real data set provided by Baylor Regional Medical Center (Baylor) in Grapevine, Texas. Tree-based models and kernel density estimation were utilized to extract important knowledge from the data for the simulation. Classification and Regression Tree model, a data mining tool for prediction and classification, was used to develop two tree structures: (a) a regression tree, from which the amount of time a nurse spends in a location is predicted based on factors, such as the primary diagnosis of a patient and the type of nurse; and (b) a classification tree, from which transition probabilities for nurse movements are determined. Kernel density estimation is used to estimate the continuous distribution for the amount of time a nurse spends in a location. Merits of using our approach for Baylor's nurse activity simulation are discussed.

References

[1]
Aickelin, U., and K. A. Dowsland. 2003. An indirect genetic algorithm for a nurse scheduling problem. Computing and Operational Research to appear.
[2]
Atlason, J., M. A. Epelman, and S. G. Henderson. 2004. Call center staffing with simulation and cutting plane methods. Annals of Operations Research 127: 333--358.
[3]
Bettonvil, B., and J. P. C. Kleijnen. 1997. Searching for important factors in simulation models with many factors: sequential bifurcation. European Journal of Operational Research. 96: 180--194.
[4]
Breiman, L., J. H. Friedman, R. A. Oishen, and C. J. Stone. 1984. Classification And Regression Trees. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
[5]
Burke, E. K., P. Cowling, P. D. Caumaecker, and G. V. Berghe. 2001. A memetic approach to the nurse rostering problem. Applied Intelligence special issue on Simulated Evolution and Learning. 15: 199--214.
[6]
Cervellera, C., V. C. P. Chen, and A. Wen. 2003. Optimization of a large-scale water reservoir network by stochastic dynamic programming with efficient state space discretization. European Journal of Operational Research to appear.
[7]
Cheng, R. C. H. 1997. Searching for important factors: Sequential bifurcation under uncertainty. In Proceeding of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. S. Andradsótir, K. J. Healy, D. H. Withers, and B. L. Nelson, 275--280, Piscataway, New Jersey.
[8]
Chen, V. C. P. 2001. Measuring the goodness of orthogonal array discretizations for stochastic programming and stochastic dynamic programming. SIAM Journal of Optimization. 12(2): 322--344.
[9]
Epachenikov, V. A. 1969. Nonparametric estimation of a multivariate probabilty density. Theory Prob. Applic. 14: 153--158.
[10]
Fu, M. C., and J. Q. Hu. 1997. Conditional Monte Carlo: Gradient Estimation and Optimization Applications. Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer.
[11]
Glasserman, P., and H. Yu-Chi. 1990. Gradient Estimation Via Perturbation Analysis. Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer.
[12]
Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. H. Friedman. 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. New York: Springer-Verlag.
[13]
INGENIX. 2003. ICD-9-CM Professional For Hospitals: Volumes 1, 2 & 3, ed. C. H. Anita, and A. H. Catherine, St. Anthony Publishing/Medicode.
[14]
Jaumard, B., F. Semet, and T. Vovor. 1998. A generalized linear programming model for nurse scheduling. European Journal of Operations Research. 107(1): 1--18.
[15]
Jones, M. C., J. S. Marron, and S. J. Sheather. 1996. A brief survey of bandwidth selection for density estmation. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 91(433): 401--407.
[16]
Kirkby, M. P. 1997. Moving to computerized schedules: A smooth transition. Nurse Management. 28: 42--44.
[17]
Miller, H. E., W. P. Pierskalla, and G. J. Rath. 1976. Nurse scheduling using mathematical programming. Operations Research. 24(5): 857--870.
[18]
Sheather, S. J., and M. C. Jones. 1991. A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estmation. Journal of Royal Statistical Society.Series B. 53(3): 683--690.
[19]
Sheather, S. J. 2004. Density estmation. Statistical Science. 19(4): 588--597.
[20]
Shen, H., and H. Wan. 2005. Controlled sequential factorial design for simulation factor screening. In Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. M. E. Kuhl, N. M. Steiger, F. B. Armstrong, and J. A. Joines, 467--474. Orlando, Florida.
[21]
Silverman, B. W. 1978. Choosing window width when estimating a density. Biometrika. 65(1): 1--11.
[22]
Silverman, B. W. 1986. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
[23]
Sundaramoorthi, D., V. C. P. Chen, J. M. Rosenberger, and D. F. B. Green. 2005. Knowledge discovery and mining for nurse activity and patient Data. In Proceedings of the 2005 IE Research Conference. Atlanta, Georgia.
[24]
Sundaramoorthi, D., V. C. P. Chen, J. M. Rosenberger, S. B. Kim, and D. F. B. Behan. 2006. Using classification and regression trees for a nurse activity simulation. In Proceedings of the 2006 IE Research Conference. Orlando, Florida.
[25]
Warner, D. M. 1976. Scheduling nursing personnel according to nursing preferences: A mathematical approach. Operations Research. 24: 842--856.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WSC '06: Proceedings of the 38th conference on Winter simulation
December 2006
2429 pages
ISBN:1424405017

Sponsors

  • IIE: Institute of Industrial Engineers
  • ASA: American Statistical Association
  • IEICE ESS: Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Engineering Sciences Society
  • IEEE-CS\DATC: The IEEE Computer Society
  • SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
  • NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • (SCS): The Society for Modeling and Simulation International
  • INFORMS-CS: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences-College on Simulation

Publisher

Winter Simulation Conference

Publication History

Published: 03 December 2006

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

WSC06
Sponsor:
  • IIE
  • ASA
  • IEICE ESS
  • IEEE-CS\DATC
  • SIGSIM
  • NIST
  • (SCS)
  • INFORMS-CS
WSC06: Winter Simulation Conference 2006
December 3 - 6, 2006
California, Monterey

Acceptance Rates

WSC '06 Paper Acceptance Rate 177 of 252 submissions, 70%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 3,413 of 5,075 submissions, 67%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 197
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media