skip to main content
10.5555/1218112.1218478acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Optimal control of make-to-order manufacturing systems via selected order acceptance

Published: 03 December 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Capacity constrained make-to-order manufacturing systems with exogenously set due dates and heavy tardiness penalties can be effectively managed by selective acceptance of orders, especially when the system encounters heavy congestion. This is demonstrated using a popular order acceptance rule. How this rule can optimally control a manufacturing system under different environments and how the main performance measures of the manufacturing system are affected in doing so, are demonstrated and analyzed. The study is done on a simulated hypothetical manufacturing system used as a testbed.

References

[1]
Bergamaschi, D., R. Cigolini, M. Perona, and A. Portoli. 1997. Order review and release strategies in a job shop environment: a review and a classification. International Journal of Production Research 35(2): 399--420.
[2]
Ebben, M. J. R., E. W. Hans, F. M. O. Weghuis. 2005. Workload based order acceptance in job shop environment. OR Spectrum 27: 107--122.
[3]
Ivanescu, C. V., Fransoo, J. C., Bertrand, J. W. M. 2002. Makespan estimation and order acceptance in batch process industries when processing times are uncertain. OR Spectrum 24(4): 467--495.
[4]
John, R. C. St. and N. R. Draper. 1975, D-optimality for regression designs: a review. Technometrics 17(1): 15--23.
[5]
Lippman, S. A. 1975. Applying a new device in the optimization of exponential queuing systems. Operations Research 23:687--710.
[6]
Lippman, S. A. and S. Ross. 1971. The streetwalker's dilemma: a job shop model. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 20: 336--344.
[7]
Miller, B. I. 1969. A queuing reward system with several customer classes. Management Sciences 16: 234--245.
[8]
Nandi, A. and P. Rogers. 2004. Using simulation to make order acceptance/rejection decisions. Simulation: Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation International 80: 131--142.
[9]
Nandi, A. and P. Rogers. 2003. Behavior of an order release mechanism in a make-to-order manufacturing system with selected order acceptance. In Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, eds. S. Chick, P. J. Sanchez, D. Ferrin, and D. J. Morris. 1251--1259. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
[10]
Philipoom, P. R. and T. D. Fry. 1992. Capacity-based order review/release strategies to improve manufacturing performance. International Journal of Production Research 30(11): 2559--2572.
[11]
Scott, M. 1970. Queuing with control on the arrival of certain types of customers. CORS Journal 8: 75--86.
[12]
Scott, M. 1969. A queuing process with some discrimination. Management Sciences 16: 227--233.
[13]
ten Kate, H. A. 1994. Towards a better understanding of order acceptance. International Journal of Production Economics 37: 139--152.
[14]
Wester, F. A. W., J. Wijngaard, and W. H. M. Zijm. 1992. Order acceptance strategies in a production-to-order environments with setup times and due dates. International Journal of Production Research 30(6): 1313--1326.
[15]
Wight, O. 1970. Input/output control a real handle on lead time. Production and Inventory Management 11(3): 9--31.
  1. Optimal control of make-to-order manufacturing systems via selected order acceptance

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WSC '06: Proceedings of the 38th conference on Winter simulation
    December 2006
    2429 pages
    ISBN:1424405017

    Sponsors

    • IIE: Institute of Industrial Engineers
    • ASA: American Statistical Association
    • IEICE ESS: Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Engineering Sciences Society
    • IEEE-CS\DATC: The IEEE Computer Society
    • SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
    • NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology
    • (SCS): The Society for Modeling and Simulation International
    • INFORMS-CS: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences-College on Simulation

    Publisher

    Winter Simulation Conference

    Publication History

    Published: 03 December 2006

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    WSC06
    Sponsor:
    • IIE
    • ASA
    • IEICE ESS
    • IEEE-CS\DATC
    • SIGSIM
    • NIST
    • (SCS)
    • INFORMS-CS
    WSC06: Winter Simulation Conference 2006
    December 3 - 6, 2006
    California, Monterey

    Acceptance Rates

    WSC '06 Paper Acceptance Rate 177 of 252 submissions, 70%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 3,413 of 5,075 submissions, 67%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 167
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media