skip to main content
10.5555/1218112.1218519acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Grand challenge case studies in a simulation curriculum

Published: 03 December 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Students wishing to become experts in modeling and simulation (M&S) need to appreciate limitations of the technology. Our goal is to expose students to the current boundaries of simulation technology. To achieve this, we propose the incorporation of grand challenge case studies into a modeling and simulation curriculum. Grand challenge problems are defined as problems for which there does not exist a universally accepted solution (at present). We argue that grand challenge case studies are an excellent vehicle for discovering and appreciating current boundaries of M&S technology. We present three candidate case studies, one in detail - the ongoing U.S. Department of Energy analysis of Yucca Mountain as a location for nuclear waste storage - with supporting discussion about how these cases can enhance exploration of the challenges in M&S technology. We discuss the proposed Yucca Mountain storage facility, along with two other case studies, and examine their integration into M&S curricula.

References

[1]
Altiok, T., P. L'Ecuyer, B. W. Schmeiser, L. W. Schruben, W. D. Kelton, B. L. Nelson, T. J. Schriber, and J. R. Wilson. 2001. Various ways academics teach simulation: are they all appropriate? In Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. B. A. Peters, J. S. Smith, D. J. Medeiros, and M. W. Rohrer, 1580--1591.
[2]
Barrett, C. L., S. G. Eubank, and J. P. Smith. 2005, March. If smallpox strikes Portland. Scientific American 292 (3): 54--61.
[3]
Carter, L. J., and T. H. Pigford. 2005. Proof of safety at yucca mountain. Science 310 (5747): 447--448. Erratum posted Vol. 310 No. 5751 November 18, 2005.
[4]
Craig, P. P. 1999. High-level nuclear waste: the status of yucca mountain. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 24:461--86.
[5]
Crosbie, R. E., J. J. Zenor, and R. C. Hilzer. 2001. More on a model curriculum for modeling and simulation. In Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. B. A. Peters, J. S. Smith, D. J. Medeiros, and M. W. Rohrer, 1596--1598.
[6]
EPA. 2005. Public health and environmental radiation protection standards for Yucca Mountain, Nevada. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Proposed Rule. Published in the Federal Register. Vol. 70, No. 161.
[7]
Epstein, J. M., and R. L. Axtell. 1996. Growing artificial societies. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
[8]
Ewing, R. C., and A. Macfarlane. 2002. Yucca mountain. Science 296 (5568): 659--660.
[9]
Fujimoto, R., D. Lunceford, E. Page, and A. M. Uhrmacher. (Eds.) 2002. Grand challenges for modeling and simulation: Dagstuhl report. Schloss Dagstuhl. Seminar No 02351, Report No 350.
[10]
Hooke, W. H., and R. Pielke. 2000. Prediction: Science, decision making, and the future of nature, Chapter 4 Short-Term Weather Prediction: An Orchestra in Need of a Conductor, 61--84. Island Press.
[11]
Lawrence, P. R. 1953. The preparation of case material. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[12]
Metlay, D. 2000. From tin roof to torn wet blanket: Predicting and observing groundwater movement at a proposed nuclear waste site. In Prediction: Science, decision making, and the future of nature, ed. D. Sarewitz, R. A. Pielke, and R. Byerly, Chapter 10, 199--230. Washington, DC: Island Press.
[13]
NEA-IAEA. 2002. Joint NEA-IAEA international peer review of the yucca mountain site characterisation project's total system performance assessment supporting the site recommendation process. A joint report by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency.
[14]
OCRWM. 2000a. Biosphere process model report. TDR-MGR-MD-000002 REV 00 ICN 01. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Las Vegas, Nevada.
[15]
OCRWM. 2000b. Disruptive events process model report. TDR-NBS-MD-000002 REV 00 ICN 02. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Las Vegas, Nevada.
[16]
OCRWM. 2000c. Engineered barrier system degradation, flow, and transport process model report. TDR-EBS-MD-000006 REV 00 ICN 01. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Las Vegas, Nevada.
[17]
OCRWM. 2000d. Integrated site model process model report. TDR-NBS-GS-000002 REV 00 ICN 01. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Las Vegas, Nevada.
[18]
OCRWM. 2000e. Near field environment process model report. TDR-NBS-MD-000001 REV 00 ICN 03. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Las Vegas, Nevada.
[19]
OCRWM. 2000f. Saturated zone flow and transport process model report. TDR-NBS-HS-000001 REV 00 ICN 01. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Las Vegas, Nevada.
[20]
OCRWM. 2000g. Total system performance assessment for the site recommendation. TDR-WIS-PA-000001 REV 00 ICN 01. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Las Vegas, Nevada.
[21]
OCRWM. 2000h. Unsaturated zone flow and transport model process model report. TDR-NBS-HS-000002 REV 00 ICN 02. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Las Vegas, Nevada.
[22]
OCRWM. 2000i. Waste form degradation process model report. TDR-WIS-MD-000001 REV 00 ICN 01. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Las Vegas, Nevada.
[23]
OCRWM. 2000j. Waste package degradation process model report. TDR-WIS-MD-000002 REV 00 ICN 01. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Las Vegas, Nevada.
[24]
OCRWM. 2002. Yucca mountain science and engineering report REV 1. DOE/RW-0539-1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Las Vegas, Nevada.
[25]
Ojovan, M. I., and W. E. Lee. 2005. An introduction to nuclear waste immobilisation. Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.
[26]
Reynolds, P. F. 2006. CS651: Advanced modeling and simulation. Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia. Course syllabus available at <www.cs.Virginia.edu/~pfr/cs651>.
[27]
Savage, D. (Ed.) 1995. The scientific and regulatory basis for the geological disposal of radioactive waste. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
[28]
Szczerbicka, H., J. Banks, R. V. Rogers, T. I. Oren, H. S. Sarjoughian, and B. P. Zeigler. 2000. Conceptions of curriculum for simulation education (panel). In Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. J. A. Joines, R. R. Barton, K. Kang, and P. A. Fishwick, 1635--1644.
[29]
Whipple, C. G. 1996. Can nuclear waste be stored safely at yucca mountain? Scientific American 274 (6): 72--79.
  1. Grand challenge case studies in a simulation curriculum

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WSC '06: Proceedings of the 38th conference on Winter simulation
    December 2006
    2429 pages
    ISBN:1424405017

    Sponsors

    • IIE: Institute of Industrial Engineers
    • ASA: American Statistical Association
    • IEICE ESS: Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Engineering Sciences Society
    • IEEE-CS\DATC: The IEEE Computer Society
    • SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
    • NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology
    • (SCS): The Society for Modeling and Simulation International
    • INFORMS-CS: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences-College on Simulation

    Publisher

    Winter Simulation Conference

    Publication History

    Published: 03 December 2006

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    WSC06
    Sponsor:
    • IIE
    • ASA
    • IEICE ESS
    • IEEE-CS\DATC
    • SIGSIM
    • NIST
    • (SCS)
    • INFORMS-CS
    WSC06: Winter Simulation Conference 2006
    December 3 - 6, 2006
    California, Monterey

    Acceptance Rates

    WSC '06 Paper Acceptance Rate 177 of 252 submissions, 70%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 3,413 of 5,075 submissions, 67%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 177
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media