ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Human-computer interaction: the human and computer as a team in emergency management information systems
Full text HtmlHtml (29 KB),  PdfPdf (287 KB)
Source Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 50 ,  Issue 3  (March 2007) table of contents
Emergency response information systems: emerging trends and technologies
SPECIAL SECTION: Emergency response information systems: emerging trends and technologies table of contents
Pages: 33 - 38  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Liz Carver  BAE Systems in Bristol, U.K
Murray Turoff  New Jersey Institute of Technology
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 423,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1226736.1226761
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Building the computer as part of the emergency management team ensures that people continue to do the things they do well, supported by the technology, not driven by it.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorptions and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly 24, 4 (Dec. 2000), 665--694.
 
2
Bainbridge, L. Increasing levels of automation can increase, rather than decrease, the problems of supporting the human operator. Automatica 19 (1983), 775--779.
 
3
Carver, E., Hinton, J., Dogan, H., and Dawson, B. Enhancing communication in rescue teams. In Proceedings of ISCRAM 2006: The Third International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (Newark, NJ, May 2006); iscram.org.
 
4
Carver, E. Information and the Operator Human Implications of New Technology. HINT project. WP4 Report, 2003.
 
5
Fitts, P.M. Engineering psychology and equipment design. In S.S. Stevens, Ed., Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Wiley, NY, 1951.
 
6
Levinthal, D.A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 1 (Mar. 1990).
 
7
Parasuraman, R. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors 39, 2 (1997), 230--253.
 
8
Sarter, N. and Woods, D. 'How in the world did we ever get into that mode?' Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors 37, 1 (1995), 5--19.
 
9
Turoff, M., Chumer, M., Van de Walle, B., and Yao, X. The design of a dynamic emergency response management information system (DERMIS). Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA) 5, 4 (Summer 2004), 1--36; www.jitta.org.
 
10
Turoff, M., Chumer, M., and Hiltz, S.R. Emergency planning as a continuous game. In Proceedings of ISCRAM 2006: The Third International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (Newark NJ, May 2006), 477--488; iscram.org.


REVIEW

"Jane Fedorowicz : Reviewer"

Human-computer interaction research reminds us of the relative strengths and weaknesses of people and technology. Carver and Turoff briefly summarize some of the most significant differences between the two, and focus on how these differences migh  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Liz Carver: colleagues
Murray Turoff: colleagues