A games first approach to teaching introductory programming

Abstract

In this paper we argue for using a "Game First" approach to teaching introductory programming. We believe that concerns over whether an OO approach or a procedural approach should be used first are secondary to the course assignment and example content. If examples are not compelling, student interest often lags thus making the OO versus procedural argument moot. We believe that game programming motivates most new programmers. Compelling assignments mean that students are far more likely to learn because they are interested, and the visual component allows students to see mistakes in their code as manifested in the resultant graphics. We describe our experiences after redesigning and offering a new introductory computer science sequence using 2D game development as a unifying theme. We teach fundamental programming concepts via two dimensional game development in Flash and ActionScript during the first quarter, transition to C++ to solidify concepts and add pointers during the second quarter, then teach a multi-phase project based game approach using C++ and openGL (2D graphics only) during the third quarter. Our surveys show that this approach improved student understanding of all seven basic topics examined.

References

1. Adams, J.C., Chance-it: an OO capstone project for cs-1, SIGCSE'98, 10--14, 1998.
2. Argent, L., Depper, B., Fajardo, R., Ghertson, S., Leutenegger, S., Lopez, M. and Rutenbeck, J, Building a Game Development Program, IEEE Computer, Vol 39, no 2, 52--61, 2006.
3. Becker, K., Teaching with games: the minesweeper and asteroids experience, J. Comput. Small Coll, 17(2), 23--33, 2001.
4. Crawford, S., Boese, E. ActionScript: A Gentle Introduction to Programming. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, Volume 21, Issue 3 (February 2006), pp. 156--168.
5. Coleman, R., Krembs, M., Labouseur, A., and Weir, J., Game design & programming concentration within the computer science curriculum, SIGCSE'05, 545--550, 2005.
6. ESA, "Essential Facts About the Computer and Video Game Industry. Entertainment Software Association, 2005. http://www.theesa.com/files/2005EssentialFacts.pdf
7. Fullerton, T., Play-Centric Games Education, IEEE Computer, Vol 39, no 2, 36--42, 2006.
8. Guzdial, M. A Media Computation Course for Non-Majors, ITiCSE'03, June 30 - July 2, 2003, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 104--108.
9. Horswill, I., and Noval, M., Evolving the Artist-Technologist, IEEE Computer, Vol 39, no 2, 53--62, 2006.
10. International Game Developers Association Education Committee, The curriculum framework, 2003.
11. Lorenzen, T., Heilman, W., Cs1 and cs2: write computer games in java! SIGCSE Bull., 34(4), 99--100, 2002.
12. Murray, J., Bogost, I., Mataes, M., and Nitsche, M., Game Design Education: Integrating Computation and Culture, IEEE Computer, Vol 39, no 2, 3--51, 2006.
13. Parberry, I., Roden, T., Kazemzadeh, M.B., Experience with an industry-driven capstone course on game programming, SIGCSE'05, 91--95, 2005.
14. Ranum, D., Miller, B., Zelle, J., Guzdial, M. Successful Approaches to Teaching Introductory Computer Science Courses with Python, Special Session, SIGCSE'06, March 1-5, 2006, Houston, Texas, USA.
15. Roumani, H. Practice What You Preach: Full Separation of Concerns in CS1/CS2. SIGCSE'06, March 1-5, 2006, Houston, Texas, USA.
16. Sweedyk, E., deLaet, M., Slattery, M.C., Kuffner, J., Computer games and cs education: why and how. SIGCSE'05, 256--257, 2005.
17. Trono, J.A., Taxman revisited, SIGCSE Bull., 26(4), 56--58, 1994.
18. Vegso, J, Drop in CS Bachelor's Degree Production. Computing Research News, Vol 18, No 2, March 2006, http://www.cra.org/CRN/articles/march06/vegso.html
19. Zyda, M., Educating the Next Generation of Game Developers, IEEE Computer, Vol 39, no 2, 30--35, 2006.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computing education programs

        • Computer science education

• Software and its engineering