ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On unification for bounded distributive lattices
Full text PdfPdf (255 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL) archive
Volume 8 ,  Issue 2  (April 2007) table of contents
Article No. 12  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:1529-3785
Author
Viorica Sofronie-Stokkermans  Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrucken, Germany
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 41,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1227839.1227844
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We give a method for deciding unifiability in the variety of bounded distributive lattices. For this, we reduce the problem of deciding whether a unification problem S has a solution to the problem of checking the satisfiability of a set ΦS of ground clauses. This is achieved by using a structure-preserving translation to clause form. The satisfiability check can then be performed by either a resolution-based theorem prover or a SAT checker. We apply the method to unification with free constants and to unification with linear constant restrictions, and show that, in fact, it yields a decision procedure for the positive theory of the variety of bounded distributive lattices. We also consider the problem of unification over (i.e., in an algebraic extension of) the free lattice. Complexity issues are also addressed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
Baader, F. and Snyder, W. 2001. Unification theory. In Handbook of Automated Reasoning, vol. 1, A. Robinson and A. Voronkov, eds. Elsevier Science. 445--532.
 
5
Birkhoff, G. 1933. On the combination of subalgebras. Proceedings of Cambridge Philosophical Society 29, 441--464.
 
6
 
7
Bürckert, H. 1991. A resolution principle for a logic with restricted quantifiers. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 568. Springer Verlag.
 
8
Burris, S. 1995. Polynomial time uniform word problems. Math. Logic Q. 41, 173--182.
 
9
Burris, S. and McKenzie, R. 1981. Decidability and Boolean representations. In Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society (series) vol. 32, 246. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.
 
10
Clark, D. M. and Davey, B. A. 1998. Natural dualities for the working algebraist. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 57. Cambridge University Press, New York.
 
11
Davey, B. and Priestley, H. 1992. Introduction to lattices and order. Cambridge University Press, New York.
 
12
Dowling, W. and Gallier, J. 1984. Linear-Time algorithms for testing the satisfiability of propositional Horn formulae. J. Logic Program. 1, 3, 267--284.
 
13
 
14
 
15
Ghilardi, S. 1997. Unification through projectivity. J. Logic Comput. 7, 6, 733--752.
 
16
 
17
 
18
19
 
20
 
21
McKinsey, J. 1943. The decision problem for some classes of sentences without quantifiers. The J. Symb. Logic 8, 3, 61--76.
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
Priestley, H. 1972. Ordered topological spaces and the representation of distributive lattices. Proc. London Math. Soc. 3, 507--530.
 
26
Schmid, J. 1979. Algebraically and existentially closed distributive lattices. Zeitschrift für Math. Logik Grundlagen Inf. 25, 525--530.
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
32

Collaborative Colleagues:
Viorica Sofronie-Stokkermans: colleagues