Using a scenario-planning tool to support an engaging online user experience

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a pilot project to research the use of a dynamic visual interface as the basis of a scenario-planning tool. We introduce 'flow' as a theoretical framework that underpins the research, describe the design and development of the software tool and, through its evaluation in user-testing trials, we develop the ideas of scenario-planning in the context of providing e-government online services. Finally, proposed future research is discussed.

REFERENCES

• 1: Accenture, (2005). Leadership in Customer Service: New Expectations, New Experiences. Available from http://www.accenture.com/NR/rdonlyres/F45CE4C8-9330-4450-BB4A-AF4E265C88D4/0/leadership_cust.pdf
• 2: Ahlberg, C., Williamson, C. & Schneiderman, B. (1992) Dynamic Query for Information Exploration: An Implementation and Evaluation. ACM Press.
• 3: Carroll, J. M. (2000). Introduction to the special issue on "Scenario-Based Systems Development," Interacting with Computers, 13(1), 41--42.
• 4: Chen, H., Wigand, R. T., & Nilan, M. S. (1999). Optimal Experiences of Web activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 585--608.
• 5: Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
• 6: Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: the psychology of engagement with everyday life (1st ed.). New York: Basic Books
• 7: Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts (2005). Trust and Growth in the Online Environment. This report is available from http://www.dcita.gov.au/ie/benchmarking/trustandgrow th
• 8: Thomas P. Novak , Donna L. Hoffman , Yiu-Fai Yung, Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach, Marketing Science, v.19 n.1, p.22-42, January 2000 [doi>10.1287/mksc.19.1.22.15184]
• 9: Pearce, J. M. (2004). An investigation of interactivity and flow: student behaviour during online instruction. PhD thesis, The University of Melbourne. Available from http://eprints.unimelb.edu.au/archive/00000892/
• 10: Pearce, J. and S. Howard (2004). Designing for Flow in a Complex Activity. 6th Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, New Zealand.
• 11: Ben Shneiderman, Tree visualization with tree-maps: 2-d space-filling approach, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.11 n.1, p.92-99, Jan. 1992 [doi>10.1145/102377.115768]
• 12: Trevino, L. K., & Webster, J. (1992). Flow in Computer-Mediated Communication. Communications Research, 19(5), 539--573.
• 13: Jane Webster , Joseph J. Martocchio, Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications, MIS Quarterly, v.16 n.2, p.201-226, June 1992 [doi>10.2307/249576]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Interaction styles (e.g., commands, menus, forms, direct manipulation)

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human information processing; Human factors; Software psychology
  H.3 INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
      H.3.5 On-line Information Services
          Subjects: Web-based services
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Theory and methods; Graphical user interfaces (GUI); User-centered design

Keywords:
e-government, engagement, flow, scenario-planning, self-service