ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The state of peer-to-peer simulators and simulations
Full text PdfPdf (130 KB)
Source
ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review archive
Volume 37 ,  Issue 2  (April 2007) table of contents
COLUMN: Editorial zone table of contents
Pages: 95 - 98  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:0146-4833
Authors
S. Naicken  University of Sussex, Brighton, U.K.
B. Livingston  University of Sussex, Brighton, U.K.
A. Basu  University of Sussex, Brighton, U.K.
S. Rodhetbhai  University of Sussex, Brighton, U.K.
I. Wakeman  University of Sussex, Brighton, U.K.
D. Chalmers  University of Sussex, Brighton, U.K.
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 43,   Downloads (12 Months): 425,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1232919.1232932
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we discuss the current situation with respect to simulation usage in P2P research, testing the available P2P simulators against a proposed set of requirements, and surveying over 280 papers to discover what simulators are already being used. We found that no simulator currently meets all our requirements, and that simulation results are generally reported in the literature in a fashion that precludes any reproduction of results. We hope that this paper will give rise to further discussion and knowledge sharing among those of the P2P and network simulation research communities, so that a simulator that meets the needs of rigorous P2P research can be developed


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
F. Dabek, B. Zhao, P. Druschel, J. Kubiatowicz, and I. Stoica. Towards a common API for structured peer-to-peer overlays. In Proc. IPTPS, volume 58. Springer, 2003.
 
3
M. Feldman, K. Lai, J. Chaung, and I. Stoica. Quantifying disincentives in peer-to-peer networks. In 1st Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, June 2003.
 
4
P. García, C. Pairot, R. Mondéjar, J. Pujol, H. Tejedor, and R. Rallo. Planetsim: A new overlay network simulation framework. In Proc. 4th Intl. Workshop on Software Engineering and Middleware (SEM 2004), volume LNCS 3437, pages 123--137, Linz, Austria, 2005. Springer.
5
6
 
7
8
9
 
10
11
12
13

Collaborative Colleagues:
S. Naicken: colleagues
B. Livingston: colleagues
A. Basu: colleagues
S. Rodhetbhai: colleagues
I. Wakeman: colleagues
D. Chalmers: colleagues