ABSTRACT
Spectrum sensing has been identified as a key enabling functionality to ensure that cognitive radios would not interfere with primary users, by reliably detecting primary user signals. Recent research studied spectrum sensing using energy detection and network cooperation via modeling and simulations. However, there is a lack of experimental study that shows the feasibility and practical performance limits of this approach under real noise and interference sources in wireless channels. In this work, we implemented energy detector on a wireless testbed and measured the required sensing time needed to achieve the desired probability of detection and false alarm for modulated and sinewave-pilot signals in low SNR regime. We measured the minimum detectable signal levels set by the receiver noise uncertainties. Our experimental study also measured the sensing improvements achieved via network cooperation, identified the robust threshold rule for hard decision combining and quantified the effects of spatial separation between radios in indoor environments.
- C. Cordeiro, K. Challapali, K. Birru, S. Shankar, "IEEE 802.22: the first worldwide wireless standard based on cognitive radios", In proc. of DySPAN'05, November 2005.Google Scholar
- D. Cabric, S. M. Mishra, D. Willkomm, R. W. Brodersen, A. Wolisz, "A Cognitive Radio Approach for Usage of Virtual Unlicensed Spectrum", 14th IST Mobile and Wireless Communications Summit, June 2005.Google Scholar
- B. Wild, K. Ramchandran, "Detecting Primary Receivers for Cognitive Radio Applications", In proc. of DySPAN'05, November 2005.Google Scholar
- H. Urkowitz, "Energy Detection of Unknown Deterministic Signal", In proc. of the IEEE, April 1967.Google Scholar
- A. Sahai, N. Hoven, R. Tandra. "Some Fundamental Limits on Cognitive Radio", In Allerton Conference on Communications, Control and Computing, October 2004.Google Scholar
- D. Cabric. S. M. Mishra. R. W. Brodersen, "Implementation Issues in Spectrum Sensing", In Asilomar Conference on Signal, Systems and Computers, November 2004.Google Scholar
- R. Tandra, A. Sahai. "Fundamental Limits on Detection in Low SNR", In proc. of the WirelessComm05 Symposium on Signal Processing, June 2005.Google Scholar
- S. M. Mishra, D. Cabric, C. Chang, D. Willkomm, B. van Schewick, A. Wolisz, R. Brodersen, "A Real Time Cognitive Radio Testbed for Physical and Link Layer Experiments" In proc. of DySPAN'05, November 2005Google Scholar
- A. Ghasemi, E. S. Sousa, "Collaborative Spectrum Sensing for Opportunistic Access in Fading Environments", In proc. of DySPAN'05, November 2005.Google Scholar
- E. Visotsky, S. Kuffner, R. Peterson. "On Collaborative Detection of TV Transmissions in Support of Dynamic Spectrum Sharing", In proc. of DySPAN'05, November 2005.Google Scholar
- S. M. Mishra, A. Sahai, R. W. Brodersen, "Cooperative Sensing among Cognitive Radios", In proc. of International Conference on Communications, ICC'06, June 2006.Google Scholar
- J. C. Liberti, T. S. Rappaport, "Statistics of shadowing in indoor radio channels at 900 and 1900 MHz", In proc. of Military Communications Conference, MILCOM'92, October 1992.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Experimental study of spectrum sensing based on energy detection and network cooperation
Recommendations
Optimal Energy Harvesting-based Weighed Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Network
In cognitive radio (CR) network, to improve spectrum sensing performance to primary user (PU) and decrease energy wastage of secondary user (SU) in cooperative spectrum sensing, an energy harvesting-based weighed cooperative spectrum sensing is proposed ...
Spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks: the cooperation-processing tradeoff
Cognitive Radio, Software Defined Radio And Adaptive Wireless SystemsOpportunistic unlicensed access to the (temporarily) unused frequency bands across the licensed radio spectrum is currently being investigated as a means to mitigate the spectrum scarcity. Such opportunistic access calls for the implementation of ...
Cooperation spectrum sensing using optimal joint detecting
WiCOM'09: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Wireless communications, networking and mobile computingIn cognitive radio networks, there are two important probabilities; the first probability is important to primary users called probability of detection as it indicates their protection level from secondary users, and the second probability is important ...
Comments