An empirical study of collaborative acoustic source localization

ABSTRACT

Field biologists use animal sounds to discover the presence of individuals and to study their behavior. Collecting bioacoustic data has traditionally been a difficult and time consuming process in which researchers use portable microphones to record sounds while taking notes of their own detailed observations. The recent development of new deployable acoustic sensor platforms presents opportunities to develop automated tools for bio-acoustic field research. In this work, we implement an AML-based source localization algorithm, and use it to localize marmot alarm-calls. We assess the performance of these techniques based on results from two field experiments: (1) a controlled test of direction-of-arrival (DOA) accuracy using a pre-recorded source signal, and (2) an experiment to detect and localize actual animals in their habitat, with a comparison to ground truth gathered from human observations. Although small arrays yield ambiguities from spatial aliasing of high frequency signals, we show that these ambiguities are readily eliminated by proper bearing crossings of the DOAs from several arrays. These results show that the AML source localization algorithm can be used to localize actual animals in their natural habitat, using a platform that is practical to deploy.

REFERENCES

• 1: D. Blumstein. The evolution of alarm communication in rodents: structure, function, and the puzzle of apparently altruistic calling in rodents. In J. Wolff and P. Sherman, editors, Rodent societies. U. Chicago Press, 2007.
• 2: D. T. Blumstein and K. B. Armitage. Alarm calling in yellow-bellied marmots: The meaning of situationally-specific alarm calls. Anim. Behav., 53:143--171, 1997.
• 3: D. T. Blumstein and J. C. Daniel. Yellow-bellied marmot discriminate between the alarm calls of individuals and are more responsive to the calls from juveniles. Anim. Behav., 68:1257--1265, 2005.
• 4: D. T. Blumstein and O. Munos. Individual, age and sex-specific information is contained in yellow-bellied marmot alarm calls. Anim. Behav., 69:353--361, 2005.
• 5: J. Bradbury and S. Vehrencamp. Principles of animal communication. Sinnauer, 1998.
• 6: J. Chen, K. Yao, and R. Hudson. Maximum-likelihood source localization and unknown source localization estimation for wideband signals in the near-field. IEEE Trans. on Signal Proc., (8):1843--1854, 2002.
• 7: J. Elson, L. Girod, and D. Estrin. A wireless time-synchronized COTS sensor platform, part i: System architecture. In IEEE CAS Workshop on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2002.
• 8: Lewis David Girod , Deborah L. Estrin, A self-calibrating system of distributed acoustic arrays, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 2005
• 9: Lewis Girod , Jeremy Elson , Alberto Cerpa , Thanos Stathopoulos , Nithya Ramanathan , Deborah Estrin, EmStar: a software environment for developing and deploying wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the USENIX Annual Technical Conference 2004 on USENIX Annual Technical Conference, p.24-24, June 27-July 02, 2004, Boston, MA
• 10: L. Girod et al. The case for WaveScope: A signal-oriented data stream management system (position paper). In Proceedings of CIDR07, 2007.
• 11: Lewis Girod , Martin Lukac , Vlad Trifa , Deborah Estrin, The design and implementation of a self-calibrating distributed acoustic sensing platform, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, October 31-November 03, 2006, Boulder, Colorado, USA [doi>10.1145/1182807.1182815]
• 12: M. L. Hall. A review of hypotheses for the functions of avian duetting. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., pages 415--430, 2004.
• 13: P. McGregor, T. Peake, and G. Gilbert. Communication behavior and conservation. In L. Gosling and W. Sutherland, editors, Behaviour and conservation, pages 261--280. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
• 14: V. Trifa. A framework for bird songs detection, recognition and localization using acoustic sensor networks. Master's thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 2006.
• 15: H. Wang et al. Acoustic sensor networks for woodpecker localization. In SPIE Conference on Advanced Signal Processing Algorithms, Architectures and Implementations, Aug. 2005.
• 16: L. Yip et al. Numerical implementation of the AML algorithm for wideband DOA estimation. In Proc. SPIE, pages 164--172, Aug. 2003.
• 17: I. Ziskine and M. Wax. Maximum likelihood localization of multiple sources by alternating projection. IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 36(10):1553--1560, Oct. 1988.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.3 SPECIAL-PURPOSE AND APPLICATION-BASED SYSTEMS
      Subjects: Signal processing systems

General Terms:
Algorithms, Experimentation, Measurement

Keywords:
AML, acoustic source localization, bioacoustics, distributed signal processing, wireless sensor networks