skip to main content
10.1145/1236360.1236409acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Active sensing platform for wireless structural health monitoring

Published:25 April 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents SHiMmer, a wireless platform for sensing and actuation that combines localized processing with energy harvesting to provide long-lived structural health monitoring. The life-cycle of the node is significantly extended by the use of super-capacitors for energy storage instead of batteries. During this period the node is expected to work completely maintenance-free. The node is capable of harvesting up to 780J per day. This makes it completely self-sufficient while employed in real structural health monitoring applications. Unlike other sensor networks that periodically monitor a structure and route information to a base station, our device acquires the data and processes it locally after being radio-triggered by an external agent. The localized processing allows us to avoid issues due to network congestion. Our experiments show that its 32-bits computational core can run at 100MIPS for 15 minutes daily.

References

  1. P. Alleyne, D.N.; Cawley. The interaction of lamb waves with defects. In IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control,, pages 381--397, May 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A. Anandarajah, K. Moore, A. Terzis, and I.-J. Wang. Sensor networks for landslide detection. In SenSys '05: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pages 268--269, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. ATMega128. http://www.atmel.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Backman, E. Flynn, R. Swartz, R. Hundhausen, and G. Park. Active piezoelectric sensing for damage identification in honeycomb composite panels. In Proceedings of 24th International Modal Analysis Conference, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. CC1100. http://www.chipcon.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. K. Chintalapudi, J. Paek, O. Gnawali, T. S. Fu, K. Dantu, J. Caffrey, R. Govindan, E. Johnson, and S. Masri. Structural damage detection and localization using netshm. In IPSN'06: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Information processing in sensor networks, pages 475--482, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Enjeti, J. Howze, and L. Palma. An approach to improve battery run-time in mobile applications with supercapacitors. In In IEEE 34th Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. FIRE. Fire project: Smokenet. http://fire.me.berkeley.edu/smokeNet.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Giraldo, J. Caicedo, and S. Dyke. Experimental phase ii of the structural health monitoring benchmark problem. In EM '03: Proceedings of the 16th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. L. Gu and J. A. Stankovic. Radio-triggered wake-up for wireless sensor networks. Real-Time Syst., 29(2-3):157--182, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. N. Guo and P. Cawley. The interaction of Lamb waves with delaminations in composite laminates . Acoustical Society of America Journal, 94:2240--2246, Oct. 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. B. Hailu, G. Hayward, A. Gachagan, A. McNab, and R. Farlow. Comparison of different piezoelectric materials for the design of embedded transducers for structural health monitoring applications. In Ultrasonics Symposium, 2000 IEEE, pages 1009--1012, Oct. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J.-H. Huang, S. Amjad, and S. Mishra. Cenwits: a sensor-based loosely coupled search and rescue system using witnesses. In SenSys '05: Proceedings of the 3 rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pages 180--191, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. C. Intanagonwiwat, R. Govindan, D. Estrin, J. Heidemann, and F. Silva. Directed diffusion for wireless sensor networking. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 11(1):2--16, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. X. Jiang, J. Polastre, and D. Culler. Perpetual environmentally powered sensor networks. In IPSN '05: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks, page 65, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2005. IEEE Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Legendre, D. Massicotte, J. Goyette, and T. Bose. Wavelet-transform-based method of analysis for lamb-wave ultrasonic node signals. In Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on, pages 524--530, June 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. E. Lehfeldt and P. Holler. Lamb waves and lamination detection. Ultrasonics, 5:255, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. P. Levis, D. Gay, and D. Culler. Active sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd USENIX/ACM Symposium on Network Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Lynch, K. Law, A. Kiremidjian, T. Kenny, E. Carryer, and A. Partridge. The design of a wireless sensing unit for structural health monitoring. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA, 2001, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S. Madden, M. J. Franklin, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. Tag: a tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev., 36(SI):131--146, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. R. Madden, M. J. Franklin, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. Tinydb: an acquisitional query processing system for sensor networks. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 30(1):122--173, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. D. L. Mascarenas, M. D. Todd, G. Park, and C. R. Farrar. A miniaturized electromechanical impedance-based node for the wireless interrogation of structural health. In Proceedings of SPIE -- Health Monitoring and Smart Nondestructive Evaluation of Structural and Biological Systems, Mar. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. D. Montalvao, N. M. Maia, and A. M. Ribeiro. A Review of Vibration-based Structural Health Monitoring with Special Emphasis on Composite Materials. The Shock and Vibration Digest, 38(4):295--324, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. S. Pakzad, S. Kim, G. Fenves, S. Glaser, D. Culler, and J. Demmel. Multi-purpose wireless accelerometers for civil infrastructure monitoring. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. C. Park and P. H. Chou. Ambimax: Efficient, autonomous energy harvesting system for multiple-supply wireless sensor nodes. In SECON '06: Proceedings of Third Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh, and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. V. Raghunathan and P. H. Chou. Design and power management of energy harvesting embedded systems. In ISLPED '06: Proceedings of the 2006 international symposium on Low power electronics and design, pages 369--374, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. V. Raghunathan, A. Kansal, J. Hsu, J. Friedman, and M. Srivastava. Design considerations for solar energy harvesting wireless embedded systems. In IPSN '05: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks, page 64, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2005. IEEE Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. F. Simjee and P. H. Chou. Everlast: long-life, supercapacitor-operated wireless sensor node. In ISLPED'06: Proceedings of the 2006 international symposium on Low power electronics and design, pages 197--202, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J. Simmers, Garnett E., J. R. Hodgkins, D. D. Mascarenas, G. Park, and H. Sohn. Improved piezoelectric self-sensing actuation. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 15(12):941--953, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. T. Smith, J. Mars, and G. Turner. Using supercapacitors to improve battery performance. In In Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. K. S.S., S. Spearing, and C. Soutis. Damage detection in composite materials using lamb wave methods. In Proceedings of the American Society for Composites, Sept. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. A. B. Thien. Pipeline structural health monitoring using micro-fiber composite active sensors. Master's thesis, University of Cincinnati, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. TMS320R2811. http://www.ti.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Y. Wang, J. P. Lynch, and K. H. Law. Design of a low-power wireless structural monitoring system for collaborative computational algorithms. In T. Kundu, editor, Health Monitoring and Smart Nondestructive Evaluation of Structural and Biological Systems IV.Edited by Kundu, Tribikram. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 5768, pp. 106--117 (2005)., pages 106--117, May 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. N. Xu, S. Rangwala, K. K. Chintalapudi, D. Ganesan, A. Broad, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. A wireless sensor network for structural monitoring. In SenSys '04: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pages 13--24, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Y. Zou, L. Tong, and G. Steven. Vibration-based model-dependant damage (Delamination) indetification and health monitoring for composite structures - A review. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2:357--378, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Active sensing platform for wireless structural health monitoring

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IPSN '07: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks
      April 2007
      592 pages
      ISBN:9781595936387
      DOI:10.1145/1236360

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 April 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate143of593submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader