ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Batch zero-knowledge proof and verification and its applications
Full text PdfPdf (414 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC) archive
Volume 10 ,  Issue 2  (May 2007) table of contents
Article No. 6  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:1094-9224
Authors
Kun Peng  Information Security Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Colin Boyd  Information Security Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Ed Dawson  Information Security Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 185,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1237500.1237502
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The batch verification technique of Bellare et al. is extended to verification of several frequently employed zero-knowledge proofs. The new techniques are correct, sound, efficient, and can be widely applied. Specific applications are discussed in detail, including batch ZK proof and verification of validity of encryption (or reencryption) and batch ZK proof and verification of validity of decryption. Considerable efficiency improvements are gained in these two applications without compromising security. As a result, efficiency of the practical cryptographic systems (such as mix networks) based on these two applications is dramatically improved.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bellare, M., Garay, J. A., and Rabin, T. 1998. Fast batch verification for modular exponentiation and digital signatures. In EUROCRYPT '98. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1403. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 236--250.
 
2
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
Harn, L. 1998. Batch verifying multiple DSA-type digital signatures. In Elecrronics Letters, 34, 9, 870--871.
 
11
 
12
13
 
14
Pedersen, T. P. 1991. A threshold cryptosystem without a trusted party. In EUROCRYPT '91. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 522--526. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 547.
 
15
Pedersen, T. P. 1992. Distributed provers and verifiable secret sharing based on the discrete logarithm problem. Ph.D. thesis, Computer Science Department, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
 
16
Peng, K., Boyd, C., Dawson, E., and Viswanathan, K. 2004. A correct, private and efficient mix network. In 2004 International Workshop on Practice and Theory in Public Key Cryptography. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2947. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 439--454.
 
17
Sako, K. and Killian, J. 1995. Receipt-free mix-type voting scheme---a practical solution to the implementation of a voting booth. In EUROCRYPT '95. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 921. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 393--403.
 
18
Shoup, V. 1999. Practical threshold signature. In IBM Research Report. IBM. IBM Research Report RZ 3121.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Kun Peng: colleagues
Colin Boyd: colleagues
Ed Dawson: colleagues