ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Tactile feedback for mobile interactions
Full text PdfPdf (252 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
San Jose, California, USA
SESSION: Mobile interaction table of contents
Pages: 159 - 162  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-593-9
Authors
Stephen Brewster  University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Faraz Chohan  University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Lorna Brown  University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 38,   Downloads (12 Months): 490,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240649
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present a study investigating the use of vibrotactile feedback for touch-screen keyboards on PDAs. Such key-boards are hard to use when mobile as keys are very small. We conducted a laboratory study comparing standard but-tons to ones with tactile feedback added. Results showed that with tactile feedback users entered significantly more text, made fewer errors and corrected more of the errors they did make. We ran the study again with users seated on an underground train to see if the positive effects trans-ferred to realistic use. There were fewer beneficial effects, with only the number of errors corrected significantly im-proved by the tactile feedback. However, we found strong subjective feedback in favour of the tactile display. The results suggest that tactile feedback has a key role to play in improving interactions with touch screens.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Akamatsu, M., MacKenzie, I.S. and Hasbrouq, T. A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device. Ergonomics, 38. 816--827.
 
2
 
3
Brewster, S.A. and King, A.J., An Investigation into the Use of Tactons to Present Progress Information. In Proc. of Interact 2005, Springer, 6--17.
 
4
 
5
Hart, S.G. and Wickens, C. Workload assessment and prediction. In Booher, H.R. ed. MANPRINT, an approach to systems integration, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1990, 257--296.
 
6
Klatzky, R. and Lederman, S. Chapter 6: Touch. In Healy, A. and Proctor, R. eds. Handbook of Psychology Volume 4: Experimental Psychology, John Wiley and Sons, 2003, 147--176.
7
8
9


Collaborative Colleagues:
Stephen Brewster: colleagues
Faraz Chohan: colleagues
Lorna Brown: colleagues