Helen Petrie
ABSTRACT
Accessibility and usability are well established concepts for user interfaces and websites. Usability is precisely defined, but there are different approaches to accessibility. In addition, different possible relationships could exist between problems encountered by disabled and non-disabled users, yet little empirical data have been gathered on this question. Guidelines for accessibility and usability of websites provide ratings of the importance of problems for users, yet little empirical data have been gathered to validate these ratings. A study investigated the accessibility of two websites with 6 disabled (blind) and 6 non-disabled (sighted) people. Problems encountered by the two groups comprised two intersecting sets, with approximately 15% overlap. For one of the two websites, blind people rated problems significantly more severely than sighted people. There was high agreement between participants as to the severity of problems, and agreement between participants and researchers. However, there was no significant agreement between either participants or researchers and the importance/priority ratings provided by accessibility and usability guidelines. Practical and theoretical implications of these results are discussed.
- DiBlas, N., Paolini, P. and Speroni, M. (2004). Usable accessibility to the Web for blind users. In C. Stary and C. Stephanidis (Eds.), User-centered Interaction Paradigms for Universal Access in the Information Society. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No 3196. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Brajnik, G. (2006). Web accessibility testing: when the method is the culprit. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No xxx. Berlin: Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., and Jacobs, I. (1999). Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10Google Scholar
- Cockton, G. and Woolrych, A., (2001). Understanding Inspection Methods: Lessons from an Assessment of Heuristic Evaluation. In A. Blandford, J. Vanderdonckt and P.D. Gray (Eds.) People and Computers XV, Springer-Verlag, 171--192, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Disability Rights Commission. (2004). The Web: access and inclusion for disabled people. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Harrison, C. and Petrie, H. (2006). Impact of usability and accessibility problems in e-commerce and e-government websites. In Proceedings of HCI 2006, Volume 1. London: British Computer Society.Google Scholar
- Henry, S.L. (2006). Introduction to Web accessibility. www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.phpGoogle Scholar
- International Standards Organization. (1992-2000). Standard 9241: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals. www.iso.org.Google Scholar
- Iwarsson, S. and Stahl, A. (2003). Accessibility, usability and universal design -- positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(2), 57--66.Google Scholar
- Koyani, S., Bailey, R., Nall, J., Allison, S., Mulligan, C., Bailey, K. and Tolson, M. (2004). Research-based Web design and usability guidelines. www.usability.gov/guidelines/guidelines_book.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen and R.L. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Petrie, H., King, N. and Hamilton, F. (2005). Accessibility of museum, library and archive websites: the MLA audit. http://www.mla.gov.uk/webdav/harmonise?Page/@id=73&Document/@id=23090&Section%5B@stateId_eq_left_hand_root%5D/@id=4302Google Scholar
- Shneiderman, B. (2000). Universal usability. Communications of the ACM, 43(5), 85--91. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shneiderman, B. (2003). Promoting universal usability with multi-layer interface design. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Universal Usability (CUU 2003). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sloan, D. (2006). Two cultures? The disconnect between the web standards movement and research-based web design guidelines for older people. Gerontechnology, 5(2), 106--112.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Techsmith. http://www.techsmith.com/morae.aspGoogle Scholar
- Thatcher, J., Waddell, C.D., Henry, S.L., Swierenga, S., Urban, M.D., Burks, M., Regan, B. and Bohman, P. (2003). Constructing accessible web sites. San Francisco: glasshaus. Google ScholarDigital Library
- van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F. and Sandberg, J. A. C., (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modeling cognitive processes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites
Recommendations
Interdependent components of web accessibility
W4A '05: Proceedings of the 2005 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A)Increasingly, the Web is providing unprecedented access to information and interaction for people with disabilities. However, the Web will not be equally accessible, allowing people with disabilities to access and contribute to the Web, until:• ...
Evaluating web site accessibility: validating the WAI guidelines through usability testing with disabled users
NordiCHI '08: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridgesThe purpose of the reported study has been to validate empirically the usefulness of using the WAI accessibility guidelines WCAG 1.0 as a heuristic for website accessibility. Through controlled usability tests of two websites with disabled users (N=7) ...
Cognitive-based approach for assessing accessibility of e-government websites
UAHCI'13: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction: user and context diversity - Volume 2The importance of internet and other communication technologies play a vital role in modern life. Websites are inherently designed for a targeted group of users, normal sighted or for the whole population including those who are visually impaired. Blind ...
Comments