ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays
Full text PdfPdf (2.27 MB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
San Jose, California, USA
SESSION: Mobile interaction techniques I table of contents
Pages: 647 - 656  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-593-9
Authors
Clifton Forlines  Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs, Cambridge, MA and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Daniel Wigdor  Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs, Cambridge, MA and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Chia Shen  Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs, Cambridge, MA
Ravin Balakrishnan  University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 90,   Downloads (12 Months): 618,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240726
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We investigate the differences -- in terms of bothquantitative performance and subjective preference -- between direct-touch and mouse input for unimanual andbimanual tasks on tabletop displays. The results of twoexperiments show that for bimanual tasks performed ontabletops, users benefit from direct-touch input. However,our results also indicate that mouse input may be moreappropriate for a single user working on tabletop tasksrequiring only single-point interaction.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
4
 
5
Barnert, W.C. (2005). A Comparison of One-Handed and Two--Handed Direct and Indirect Computer Interaction. Department of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, Mass. Technical Report 2005--11.
6
 
7
8
 
9
Card, S., English, W., and Burr, B. (1978). Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21. p. 601--613.
 
10
Czerwinski, M., Smith, G., Regan, T., Meyers, B., Robertson, G., and Starkweather, G. (2003). Toward characterizing the productivity benefits of very large displays. Interact Conference. p. 9--16.
11
 
12
Fitts, P. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47. p. 381--391.
13
 
14
Guiard, Y. (1987). Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19(4). p. 486--517.
 
15
Guiard, Y., and Ferrand, T. (1995). Asymmetry in bimanual skills. in Manual asymmetries in motor performance, Elliott and Roy, Editors. CRC Press.
16
17
18
19
20
 
21
Kelso, J., Southard, D., and Goodman, D. (1979). On the coordination of two-handed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5(2). p. 229--238.
22
23
24
25
 
26
MacKenzie, S. (1992). Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7. p. 91--139.
27
28
29
 
30
Marteniuk, R., MacKenzie, C., and Baba, D. (1984). Bimanual movement control: Information Processing and interaction effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A. p. 335--365.
31
 
32
Microsoft. Pointer ballistics for Windows XP. Accessed on Mar 23, 2006, http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/device/input/pointer-bal.mspx.
 
33
 
34
 
35
 
36
Parker, K., Mandryk, R., Nunes, M., and Inkpen, K. (2005). TractorBeam selection aids: Improving target acquisition for pointing input on tabletop displays. Interact Conference. p. 80--93.
 
37
 
38
 
39
 
40
41
42
 
43


Collaborative Colleagues:
Clifton Forlines: colleagues
Daniel Wigdor: colleagues
Chia Shen: colleagues
Ravin Balakrishnan: colleagues