ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Utility analysis for topically biased PageRank
Full text PdfPdf (269 KB)
Source
International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Banff, Alberta, Canada
POSTER SESSION: Search table of contents
Pages: 1211 - 1212  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-654-7
Authors
Christian Kohlschütter  L3S / University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany
Paul-Alexandru Chirita  L3S / University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany
Wolfgang Nejdl  L3S / University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 80,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1242572.1242770
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

PageRank is known to be an efficient metric for computing general document importance in the Web. While commonly used as a one-size-fits-all measure, the ability to produce topically biased ranks has not yet been fully explored in detail. In particular, it was still unclear to what granularity of "topic" the computation of biased page ranks makes sense. In this paper we present the results of a thorough quantitative and qualitative analysis of biasing PageRank on Open Directory categories. We show that the MAP quality of Biased PageRank generally increases with the ODP level up to a certain point, thus sustaining the usage of more specialized categories to bias PageRank on, in order to improve topic specific search.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
M. Kendall. Rank Correlation Methods. Hafner, 1955.
 
4
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford University, 1998.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Christian Kohlschütter: colleagues
Paul-Alexandru Chirita: colleagues
Wolfgang Nejdl: colleagues