ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Accessmonkey: a collaborative scripting framework for web users and developers
Full text PdfPdf (941 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 225 archive
Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A) table of contents
Banff, Canada
SESSION: Web 2.0 in development table of contents
Pages: 25 - 34  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:1-59593-590-X
Authors
Jeffrey P. Bigham  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Richard E. Ladner  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Sponsors
: Mozilla Foundation
HA&AC : IBM Human Ability and Accessibility Center
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
: Zakon Group
SIGACCESS: ACM Special Interest Group on Accessible Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 162,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1243441.1243452
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Efficient access to web content remains elusive for individuals accessing the web using assistive technology. Previous efforts to improve web accessibility have focused on developer awareness, technological improvement, and legislation, but these approaches have left remaining concerns. First, while many tools can help produce accessible content, these tools are generally difficult to integrate into existing developer workflows and rarely offer specific suggestions that developers can implement. Second, tools that automatically improve web content for users generally solve specific problems and are difficult to combine and use on a diversity of existing assistive technology. Finally, although blind web users have proven adept at overcoming the shortcomings of the web and existing tools, they have been only marginally involved in improving the accessibility of their own web experience.

As a first step toward addressing these concerns, we introduce Accessmonkey, a common scripting framework that web users, web developers and web researchers can use to collaboratively improve accessibility. This framework advances the idea that Javascript and dynamic web content can be used to improve inaccessible content instead of being a cause of it. Using Accessmonkey, web users and developers on different platforms with potentially different goals can collaboratively make the web more accessible. In this paper we first present the Accessmonkey framework, describe three implementations of it that we have created and offer several example scripts that demonstrate its utility. We conclude by discussing future extensions of this work that will provide efficient access to scripts as users browse the web and allow non-technical users be involved in creating scripts.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A-Prompt. Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC) and the TRACE Center at the University of Wisconsin. http://www.aprompt.ca/.
 
2
Greasemonkey Firefox extension. http://greasemonkey.mozdev.org/.
 
3
Turnabout. Reify Software. http://www.reifysoft.com/turnabout.php.
 
4
Watchfire Bobby. http://www.watchfire.com/products/webxm/bobby.aspx.
 
5
Firefox accessibility extension, 2006. Illinois Center for Information Technology.
 
6
GW Micro Window-Eyes, 2006. http://www.gwmicro.com/Window-Eyes/.
 
7
JAWS 8.0 for windows. Freedom Scientific, 2006. http://www.freedomscientific.com.
 
8
Lift. UsableNet, 2006. http://www.usablenet.com/.
 
9
W3C markup validation service v0.7.4, 2006. http://validator.w3.org/.
 
10
Web accessibility checker. University of Toronto Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), 2006. http://checker.atrc.utoronto.ca/.
 
11
Web content accessibility guidelines 2.0 (wcag 2.0). World Wide Web Consortium, 2006. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/.
 
12
S. Bechhofer, C. Goble, L. Carr, S. Kampa, W. Hall, and D. De Roure. Cohse: Conceptual open hypermedia service. Frontiers in Artifical Intelligence and Applications, 96, 2003.
13
14
15
 
16
D. R. Commission. The web: Access and inclusion for disabled people. The Stationary Office, 2004.
17
18
19
20
 
21
M. Y. Ivory. Automated Web Site Evaluation Reseachers' and Practitioners' Perspectives. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
 
22
H. Jung, J. Allen, N. Chambers, L. Galescu, M. Swift, and W. Taysom. One-shot procedure learning from instruction and observation. In Proceedings of the International FLAIRS Conference: Special Track on Natural Language and Knowledge Representation.
23
24
25
26
 
27
R. C. Miller and B. Myers. Creating dynamic world wide web pages by demonstration, 1997.
28
 
29
30
31
32
 
33
S. R. Turner. Playtpus firefox extension, 2006. http://platypus.mozdev.org/.
 
34
M. Vorburger. Altifier: Web accessibility enhancement tool, 1999.
 
35
H. Wang. Nextplease!, 2006. http://nextplease.mozdev.org/.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Jeffrey P. Bigham: colleagues
Richard E. Ladner: colleagues