skip to main content
10.1145/1243441.1243463acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesw4aConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Accessibility of emerging rich web technologies: web 2.0 and the semantic web

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Web 2.0 is a new approach to Web content, making it more interactive and allowing sites to combine features in new ways. This change in paradigm brings new challenges to people with disabilities. Accessibility advocates must develop solutions rapidly. Semantic Web technologies address some of these requirements, and accessibility innovation may be part of A convergence of the Web 2.0 and Semantic Web.

References

  1. Andrews, R. Changing the Face of Web Surfing. Wired, July 20 2004. http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/news/2004/07/64253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Altheim, M., Boumphrey, F., McCarron, S., Schnitzelbaum, S., Dooley, S., and Wugofski, T. Xhtml Modularization 1.1. W3C Working Draft, July 5 2006. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml-modularization-20060705.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bray, T., Hollander, D., Layman, A., and Tobin, R. Namespaces in XML 1.1. W3C Recommendation, August 16 2006. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names11-20060816.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Castaldo, R. Harmonizing the Accessibility Expertise in Europe. In Accessible on-line services, a benefit for all. January 29 2007. http://inova.snv.jussieu.fr/evenements/colloques/servonline/Actes/description_ang.php?id=62&num=45Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dardailler, D., Palmer, S., and McCathienevile, C., Xml Accessibility Guidelines. W3C Working Draft, October 3 2002. http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xag-20021003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dimon, G. Microformats Primer. November 14 2005. http://www.digital-web.com/articles/microformats_primer/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hof, R. Mix, Match, and Mutate. Business Week, July 25 2005. http://www.businessweek.com/@@76IH*ocQ34AvyQMA/magazine/content/05_30/b3944108_mz063.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacobs, I., Gunderson, J., and Hansen, E. User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. W3C Recommendation, December 17 2002. http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-UAAG10-20021217/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Microformats. http://microformats.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. O'Reilly, T. What is Web 2.0. September 30 2005. http://tim.oreilly.com/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Patel-Schneider, P., Hayes, P., and Horrocks, I. Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax. W3C Recommendation, February 10 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-semantics-20040210/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Pilgrim, M., Leventhal, A., and Gibson, B. Embedding Accessibility Role and State Metadata in HTML Documents. December 12 2006. http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/adaptable/HTML4/embedding-20061212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Programmable Web. http://www.programmableweb.com/mashups.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Schwerdtfeger, R. Roadmap for Accessible Rich Internet Applications. W3C Working Draft. December 20 2006. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-aria-roadmap-20061220/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Seeman, L. Roles for Accessible Rich Internet Applications. W3C Working Draft, December 20 2006. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-aria-role-20061220/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Seeman, L. States and Properties Module for Accessible Rich Internet Applications. W3C Working Draft, December 20 2006. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-aria-state-20061220/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Treviranus, J., McCathienevile, C., Jacobs, I., and Richards, J. Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. W3C Recommendation, February 3 2000. http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-ATAG10-20000203.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Van Kesteren, A. The XMLHttpRequest Object. W3C Working Draft February 27 2007. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-XMLHttpRequest-20070227/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Accessibility of emerging rich web technologies: web 2.0 and the semantic web

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A)
        May 2007
        179 pages
        ISBN:1595935908
        DOI:10.1145/1243441

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 May 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        W4A '07 Paper Acceptance Rate11of27submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate171of371submissions,46%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader