skip to main content
10.1145/1244002.1244230acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Automatic classification of digestive organs in wireless capsule endoscopy videos

Published:11 March 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wireless Capsule Endoscopy (WCE) allows a physician to examine the entire small intestine without any surgical operation. With the miniaturization of wireless and camera technologies the ability comes to view the entire gestational track with little effort. Although WCE is a technical break-through that allows us to access the entire intestine without surgery, it is reported that a medical clinician spends one or two hours to assess a WCE video, It limits the number of examinations possible, and incur considerable amount of costs. To reduce the assessment time, it is critical to develop a technique to automatically discriminate digestive organs such as esophagus, stomach, small intestinal (i.e., duodenum, jejunum, and ileum) and colon. In this paper, we propose a novel technique to segment a WCE video into these anatomic parts based on color change pattern analysis. The basic idea is that the each digestive organ has different patterns of intestinal contractions that are quantified as the features. We present the experimental results that demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

References

  1. J. Berens, M. Mackiewicz, and D. Bell. Stomach, intestine and colon tissue discriminators for wireless capsule endoscopy images. In Proc. of SPIE Conference on Medical Imaging, volume 5747, pages 283--290, Bellingham, WA, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. G. Bresci, G. Parisi, M. Bertoni, T. Emanuele, and A. Capria. Video capsule endoscopy for evaluating obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and suspected small-bowel pathology. J Gastroenterol, 39(8):803--806, August 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Y. Du, C.-I. Chang, and P. D. Thouin. Unsupervised approach to color video thresholding. Optical Engineering, 43(2):282--289, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. W. B. Frakes and R. Baeza-Yates. Information Retrieval - Data Structures and Algorithms. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Y. Gong, H. Chua, and X. Guo. Image indexing and retrieval based on color histogram. In Proc. of Int'l Conf. Multimedia Modeling, pages 115--126, Singapore, Nov. 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Hafner and et al. Efficient color histogram indexing for quadratic from distance function. In IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, pages 729--736, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Hubka, V. Rosik, J. Zdinak, M. Tysler, and I. Hulin. Independent Component Analysis of Electrogastrographic Signals. MEASUREMENT SCIENCE REVIEW, 5(2):21--24, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Hwang, J. Oh, J. Cox, S. J. Tang, and H. F. Tibbals. Blood detection in wireless capsule endoscopy using expectation maximization clustering, volume 6144. SPIE, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Lee, J.-H. Oh, and S. Hwang. Scenario based dynamic video abstractions using graph matching. In ACM Multimedia, pages 810--819, Singapore, November 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Masaru Suzuki, S. Hori, T. Funabiki, T. Masaoka, R. S. Hirota, and N. Aikawa. Electrocardiogram Signal De-noising Using Multiple Auto-filtering. Acad Emerg Med, 13(5):S187, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. Masri and A. Bateman. Improved modelling of attack transient in music analysis-resynthesis. University of Bristol., 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P. Spyridonos, F. Vilarino, J. Vitria, F. Azpiroz, and P. Radeva. Anisotropic Feature Extraction from Endoluminal Images for Detection of Intestinal Contractions. In Proceedings of the 9th MICCAI, Copenhagen, Denmark, October 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Swain. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Internation Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 52(90004):48iv-50, June 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Tang and G. Haber. Capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clinics of North America, 14:87--100, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. F. Vilarino, L. I. Kuncheva, and P. Radeva. ROC curves and video analysis optimization in intestinal capsule endoscopy. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27:875--881, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Automatic classification of digestive organs in wireless capsule endoscopy videos

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SAC '07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Applied computing
          March 2007
          1688 pages
          ISBN:1595934804
          DOI:10.1145/1244002

          Copyright © 2007 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 March 2007

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader