skip to main content
10.5555/1248460.1248481acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Mobile government fieldwork: a preliminary study of technological, organizational, and social challenges

Published:20 May 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

With its GoMobile project, the City of Seattle is pioneering the utilization of fully mobile wirelessly connected (FMWC) technology applications in fieldwork operations with the aim of significantly improving its operational effectiveness and efficiency as well as its quality of service. Our study analyzes and assesses the efficacy of this prototypical mobile Government project. Preliminary findings, based on the study of one division, show that beyond the expectable technology hurdles numerous unforeseen challenges in the organizational and social context emerge, which when taken together can present staunch and tall obstacles to arriving at the intended outcome. Our study uses a work-centered analytical framework for deriving and clarifying the strategic choices in such projects via a formative model. Our narrative model captures and surfaces the interaction and interdependence between major organizational variables and the work context. In this paper, we report on our early observations and high-level findings.

References

  1. Anonymous. Digital Government Society Mission Statement, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous. Seattle Public Utilities, The City of Seattle, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Anttiroiko, A.-V. Towards Ubiquitous Government: The Case of Finland. e-Service Journal, 4 (1). 65--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bleiler, R. GoMobile Seattle Public Utilities, Public Utilities, Seattle, (2003), 1--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bleiler, R. SPU Technology Project Post-Implementation Review: Water Operations Mobile Computing, Seattle, 2003, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Capra, L., Blair, G. S., Mascolo, C., Emmerich, W. and Grace, P. Exploiting Reflection in mobile computing middleware. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 6 (4). 34--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Champy, J. Reengineering management: the mandate for new leadership. HarperBusiness, New York, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cichocki, A. Workflow and process automation: concepts and technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Davenport, T. H. and Short, J. E. The new industrial reengineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 31 (Summer). 11--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Davenport, T. H. and Stoddard, D. B. Reengineering: business change of mythic proportions? MIS Quarterly, 18 (2). 121--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5 (2). 121--147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fidel, R. The case study method: A case study. Library an Information Science Research, 6 (3). 273--288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Fidel, R. and Pejtersen, A. M. From information behaviour research to the design of information systems: the Cognitive Work Analysis framework. Information Research, 10 (1). paper 210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuglseth, A. M. and Gronhaug, K. IT-enabled redesign of complex and dynamic business processes: the case of bank credit evaluation. Omega, 25 (1). 93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Giddens, A. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gorlenko, L. and Merrick, R. No wires attached: Usability challenges in the connected mobile world. IBM Systems Journal, 42 (4), 639--651. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Grover, V., Teng, J., Segars, A. H. and Fiedler, K. The influence of information technology diffusion and business process change on perceived productivity: The IS executive's perspective. Information & Management, 34. 141--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hammer, M. Beyond reengineering: how the process-centered organization is changing our work and our lives. HarperBusiness, New York, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Hammer, M. and Champy, J. Reengineering the corporation: a manifesto for business revolution. HarperBusiness, New York, NY, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ho, A. T.-k. Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62 (4). 434--444.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hofacker, I. and Vetschera, R. Algorithmical approaches to business process design. Computers & Operations Research, 28 (13). 1253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jarvenpaa, S. L. and Stoddard, D. B. Business process redesign: Radical and evolutionary change. Journal of Business Research, 41 (1). 15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kallio, J., Saarinen, T., Salo, S., Tinnila, M. and Vepsalainen, A. P. J. Drivers and tracers of business process changes. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8. 125--142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Katz, D. and Kahn, R. L. The social psychology of organizations. Wiley, New York, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaylor, C., Deshazo, R. and Eck, D. V. Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities. Government Information Quarterly, 18 (4). 293--307.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaylor, C. H. The next wave of e-Government: The challenges of data architecture. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 31 (2). 18--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumar, S. and Strehlow, R. Business process redesign as a tool for organizational development. Technovation, 24 (11). 853.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kushchu, I. and Kushchu, H., From E-Government to M-Government: Facing the Inevitable. in Third European Conference on E-Government (ECEG), (Dublin, Ireland, 2003), Trinity College.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Mansar, S. L. and Reijers, H. A. Best practices in business process redesign: validation of a redesign framework. Computers in Industry, 56 (5). 457. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Newcombe, T. Mobile mapping Government Technology, Folsom, CA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Newman, M. and Robey, D. A social process model of user-analyst relationships. MIS Quarterly, 16 (2). 249--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Orlikowski, W. J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3 (3). 398--427.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Orlikowski, W. J. and Robey, D. Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Information Systems Research, 2 (2). 143--169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Pardo, T. A. and Scholl, H. J., Walking atop the cliffs: Avoiding failure and reducing risk in large-scale e-government projects. in 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS35), (Waikoloa, Big Island, HI, 2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Pardo, T. A., Scholl, H. J. J., Cook, M. E., Connelly, D. R. and Dawes, S. S. New York State Central Accounting System Stakeholder Needs Analysis. Center for Technology in Government, Albany, NY, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Rasmussen, J. Information processing and human-machine interaction: an approach to cognitive engineering. North-Holland, New York, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Reijers, H. A. and Liman Mansar, S. Best practices in business process redesign: an overview and qualitative evaluation of successful redesign heuristics. Omega, 33 (4). 283.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Rysavy, P. Wireless IP: A case study, PCS Dara, Hood River, OR, 1999, 15/175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Scholl, H. J., The mobility paradigm in electronic government theory and practice: A strategic framework. in Euro Mobile Government (Euro mGov) Conference, (Brighton, UK, 2005), ICMG, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Scholl, H. J., Organizational transformation through e-Government: Myth or Reality? in 4th International Conference EGOV05, (Copenhagen, Denmark, 2005), Springer-Verlag, 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Smart, P. K., Brookes, N. J., Lettice, F. E., Backhouse, C. J. and Burns, N. D. A boundary-based view of product development: A feasibility study. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 216 (1). 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Stohr, E. A. and Zhao, J. L. Temporal Workflow Management in a Claim Handling System. Software Engineering Notes, 24 (2). 187--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Taylor, J. R. and Van Every, EJ. The emergent organization: communication as its site and surface. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J., 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Vicente, K. J. Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J., 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Zhao, J. L., Kumar, A. and Stohr, E. A. Workflow-centric Communication Mechanisms for Organizational Knowledge Distribution. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17 (3). 45--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Mobile government fieldwork: a preliminary study of technological, organizational, and social challenges

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader