ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Predicting criminal relationships using multivariate survival analysis
Full text PdfPdf (89 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 228 archive
Proceedings of the 8th annual international conference on Digital government research: bridging disciplines & domains table of contents
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
SESSION: System demonstrations and posters table of contents
Pages: 290 - 291  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:1-59593-599-1
Authors
Siddharth Kaza  University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Daning Hu  University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Homa Atabakhsh  University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Hsinchun Chen  University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Sponsors
: Center for Technology in Government
: CISCO
: Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental Statistics
: CIMIC
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 71,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   

ABSTRACT

Criminal networks evolve over time with the formation and dissolution of links to survive control efforts by government authorities. Previous studies have shown that the link formation process in such networks is influenced by a set of facilitators. However, there have been few empirical evaluations to determine the significant facilitators. In this study, we used dynamic social network analysis methods to examine several plausible link formation facilitators in a large-scale real-world narcotics network. Multivariate Cox regression showed that mutual acquaintance and vehicle affiliations were significant facilitators in the network under study. The findings shown in this poster can help government authorities automatically predict co-offending relationships in future crimes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Coles, N. It's not What you know - It's Who you know that counts. Analyzing Serious Crime Groups as Social Networks. British Journal of Criminology, 41 (4). 580--594.
 
2
Feld, S. L. Social Structural Determinants of Similarity among Associates. American Sociological Review, 47 (6). 797--801.
 
3
Kossinets, G. and Watts, D. J. Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network. Science, 311 (5757). 88--90.
 
4
Marshall, B., Kaza, S. et al., Cross-Jurisdictional Criminal Activity Networks to Support Border and Transportation Security, in 7th Annual IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2004), (Washington, D.C., 2004).
 
5
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. and Cook, J. M. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27. 415--444.
 
6
Milward, H. B. and Raab, J. Dark Networks as Organizational Problems: Elements of a Theory. International Public Management Journal, 9 (3).
 
7
Reiss, A. J. Co-offender Influences on Criminal Careers, in Criminal Careers and Career Criminals, National Academy Press, 1986.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Siddharth Kaza: colleagues
Daning Hu: colleagues
Homa Atabakhsh: colleagues
Hsinchun Chen: colleagues