ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the convergence of Newton's method for monotone systems of polynomial equations
Full text PdfPdf (222 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
San Diego, California, USA
SESSION: Session 4B table of contents
Pages: 217 - 226  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-631-8
Authors
Stefan Kiefer  Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
Michael Luttenberger  Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
Javier Esparza  Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 116,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1250790.1250822
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Monotone systems of polynomial equations (MSPEs) are systems of fixed-point equations X1 = f1(X1, ..., Xn), ..., Xn = fn(X1, ..., Xn) where each fi is a polynomial with positive real coefficients. The question of computing the least non-negative solution of a given MSPE X = f(X) arises naturally in the analysis of stochastic context-free grammars, recursive Markov chains, and probabilistic pushdown automata. While the Kleene sequence f(0), f(f(0)), ... always converges to the least solution mu.f, if it exists, the number of iterations needed to compute the first i bits of mu.f may grow exponentially in i.Etessami and Yannakakis have recently adapted Newton's iterative method to MSPEs and proved that the Newton sequence converges at least as fast as the Kleene sequence and exponentially faster in many cases.They conjecture that, given an MSPE of size m, the number of Newton iterations needed to obtain i accurate bits of mu.f grows polynomially in i and m. In this paper we show that the number of iterations grows linearly in i for strongly connected MSPEs and may grow exponentially in m for general MSPEs.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
[1] T. Brázdil, A. Ku¿era, and O. Stra¿ovský. On the decidability of temporal properties of probabilistic pushdown automata. In Proceedings of STACS'2005, volume 3404 of LNCS, pages 145-157. Springer, 2005.
 
2
[2] D. W. Decker and C. T. Kelley. Newton's method at singular points I. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 17(1):66-70, 1980.
 
3
[3] R. D. Dowell and S. R. Eddy. Evaluation of several lightweight stochastic context-free grammars for RNA secondary structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 5(71), 2004.
 
4
[4] R. Durbin, S. R. Eddy, A. Krogh, and G. J. Michison. Biological Sequence Analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
 
5
[5] J. Esparza, S. Kiefer, and M. Luttenberger. On fixed point equations over commutative semirings. In Proceedings of STACS, LNCS 4397, pages 296-307, 2007.
 
6
 
7
 
8
[8] K. Etessami and M. Yannakakis. Algorithmic verification of recursive probabilistic systems. In Proceedings of TACAS 2005, LNCS 3440, pages 253-270. Springer, 2005.
 
9
 
10
[10] K. Etessami and M. Yannakakis. Recursive Markov chains, stochastic grammars, and monotone systems of nonlinear equations. In STACS, pages 340-352, 2005.
 
11
[11] K. Etessami and M. Yannakakis. Recursive Markov decision processes and recursive stochastic games. In Proceedings of ICALP 2005, volume 3580 of LNCS. Springer, 2005.
 
12
[12] K. Etessami and M. Yannakakis. Recursive Markov chains, stochastic grammars, and monotone systems of nonlinear equations, 2006. Draft journal submission, http://homepages. inf.ed.ac.uk/kousha/bib_index.html.
13
 
14
[14] R. Fagin, A. R. Karlin, J. Kleinberg, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, R. Rubinfeld, M. Sudan, and A. Tomkins. Random walks with "back buttons". Annals of Applied Probability, 11(3):810-862, 2001.
 
15
[15] S. Geman and M. Johnson. Probabilistic grammars and their applications, 2002.
 
16
[16] A. Griewank and M. R. Osborne. Newton's method for singular problems when the dimension of the null space is > 1. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 18(1):145-149, 1981.
 
17
[17] C. T. Kelley. Iterative Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations. SIAM, 1995.
 
18
[18] B. Knudsen and J. Hein. Pfold: RNA secondary structure prediction using stochastic context-free grammars. Nucleic Acids Research, 31(13):3423-3428, 2003.
 
19
 
20
 
21
[21] J. M. Ortega. Numerical Analysis: A Second Course. Academic Press, New York, 1972.
 
22
 
23
[23] F. A. Potra and V. Pták. Sharp error bounds for Newton's process. Numerische Mathematik, 34(1):63-72, 1980.
 
24
[24] G. W. Reddien. On Newton's method for singular problems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 15:993-996, 1978.
 
25
[25] Y. Sakabikara, M. Brown, R. Hughey, I. S. Mian, K. Sjolander, R. C. Underwood, and D. Haussler. Stochastic context-free grammars for tRNA. Nucleic Acids Research, 22:5112-5120, 1994.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Stefan Kiefer: colleagues
Michael Luttenberger: colleagues
Javier Esparza: colleagues