skip to main content
10.1145/1254960.1254969acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

An in-depth case study of art-technology collaboration

Published:13 June 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an in-depth case study of the collaborative process of a creative art-technology project. We begin by providing a brief description of art-technology collaboration research and go on to describe the particular art-technology collaboration project called "GEO Narrative Landscapes". This is followed by an account of a novel method for the analysis of the interaction between artists and technologists based on five communication modes. Findings include common types of conversation topics of communication modes, how these modes related to each other and how they were distributed in terms of frequencies and duration across meetings. Finally, we discuss the contribution of this work to our understanding of art-technology collaboration.

References

  1. Bryman, A., Social research methods. 2nd ed. 2004, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Social Research Methods Series, ed. L. Bickman and D.J. Rog. 2002, Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fourmentraux, J.--P., Internet artworks, artists and computer programmers: sharing the creative process. Leonardo, 2006. 39(1): p. 45--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Steinheider, B. and G. Legrady, Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Digital Media Arts: A Psychological Perspective on the Production Process. Leonardo 2004. 37(4): p. 315--321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Salter, C.L. and S.X. Wei. Sponge: A Case Study in Practiced--Based Collaborative Art Research. in The 5th Creativity and Cognition Conference. 2005. Goldsmiths College London: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mangold, INTERACT user guide. 2005, Arnstorf, Germany: Mangold International GmbH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Harris, C., Art and innovation: the Xerox PARC artist--in--residence program. Leonardo. 1999, Cambridge: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Candy, L. and E.A. Edmonds, Explorations in Art and Technology. 2002, London: Springer--Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Zhang, Y. and L. Candy. A Study of Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Art and Technology in Engage: Interaction, Art & Audience Experience. 2006. Sydney, Australia: Creativity and Cognition Studio Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhang, Y. and L. Candy. Investigating Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Case Studies in Art and Technology. in The 3rd international conference on Qualitative Research in IT & IT in Qualitative Research. 2006. Brisbane, Australia: Griffith University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhang, Y. and L. Candy, Investigating collaboration in art and technology. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 2006. 2(4): p. 239 -- 248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhang, Y. and L. Candy. A communicative behaviour analysis of art--technology collaboration. in The 12th International Conference on Human--Computer Interaction. 2007. Beijing, China: Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Cycling74. Max 4: Getting Started. 2001 {cited 2006 October}; Available from: http://www.synthesisters.com/download/Max4GettingStarted.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Java. {cited 2006; Available from: http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/java/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Denzin, N. and Y. Lincoln, Entering the field of qualitative research, in Strategies For Qualitative Inquiry, N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, Editors. 1998, Sage: London p. 1--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Slack, F. and J. Rowley, Observation: Perspectives on Research Methodologies for leisure Managers. Management Research News, 2001. 24(1/2): p. 35--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ericsson, K.A. and R.J. Crutcher, Introspection and verbal reports on cognitive processes -- two approaches to the study of thought processes: A response to Howe. New Ideas in Psychology, 1991. 9(1): p. 57--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Suwa, M., T. Purcell, and J. Gero, Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions. Design Studies, 1998. 19(4): p. 455--483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Cross, N., H. Christiaans, and K. Dorst, Introduction: The Delft Protocols Workshop, in Analysing design activity, N. Cross, H. Christiaans, and K. Dorst, Editors. 1996, John Wiley & Sons: Baffins Lane, Chichester. p. 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Edmonds, E., et al. Macaroni Synthesis: A Creative Multimedia Collaboration. in The seventh international conference on information visualization (IV'03). 2003. Los Alamitos, CA.: IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Candy, L. and E.A. Edmonds. Expertise, Collaboration and Creativity for Technology Design. in Asia--Pacific Conference on Computer--Human Interaction (APCHI). 2004. Rotorua, New Zealand Springer-- Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Cross, N., Designerly ways of knowing. 2006, London: Springer--Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Candy, L. and E.A. Edmonds. Modeling Co--Creativity in Art and Technology. in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Creativity and Cognition. 2002. New York: ACM press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Edmonds, E.A., et al., The Studio as Laboratory: Combining Creative Practice and Digital Technology Research. International Journal of Man--Machine Studies, Special Issue on Creativity and Computational Support, 2005. 63(4): p. 452--481. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An in-depth case study of art-technology collaboration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      C&C '07: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & cognition
      June 2007
      330 pages
      ISBN:9781595937124
      DOI:10.1145/1254960

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 June 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader