ABSTRACT
This paper presents an in-depth case study of the collaborative process of a creative art-technology project. We begin by providing a brief description of art-technology collaboration research and go on to describe the particular art-technology collaboration project called "GEO Narrative Landscapes". This is followed by an account of a novel method for the analysis of the interaction between artists and technologists based on five communication modes. Findings include common types of conversation topics of communication modes, how these modes related to each other and how they were distributed in terms of frequencies and duration across meetings. Finally, we discuss the contribution of this work to our understanding of art-technology collaboration.
- Bryman, A., Social research methods. 2nd ed. 2004, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Social Research Methods Series, ed. L. Bickman and D.J. Rog. 2002, Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Fourmentraux, J.--P., Internet artworks, artists and computer programmers: sharing the creative process. Leonardo, 2006. 39(1): p. 45--50.Google Scholar
- Steinheider, B. and G. Legrady, Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Digital Media Arts: A Psychological Perspective on the Production Process. Leonardo 2004. 37(4): p. 315--321.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Salter, C.L. and S.X. Wei. Sponge: A Case Study in Practiced--Based Collaborative Art Research. in The 5th Creativity and Cognition Conference. 2005. Goldsmiths College London: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mangold, INTERACT user guide. 2005, Arnstorf, Germany: Mangold International GmbH.Google Scholar
- Harris, C., Art and innovation: the Xerox PARC artist--in--residence program. Leonardo. 1999, Cambridge: MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Candy, L. and E.A. Edmonds, Explorations in Art and Technology. 2002, London: Springer--Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhang, Y. and L. Candy. A Study of Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Art and Technology in Engage: Interaction, Art & Audience Experience. 2006. Sydney, Australia: Creativity and Cognition Studio Press.Google Scholar
- Zhang, Y. and L. Candy. Investigating Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Case Studies in Art and Technology. in The 3rd international conference on Qualitative Research in IT & IT in Qualitative Research. 2006. Brisbane, Australia: Griffith University Press.Google Scholar
- Zhang, Y. and L. Candy, Investigating collaboration in art and technology. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 2006. 2(4): p. 239 -- 248.Google Scholar
- Zhang, Y. and L. Candy. A communicative behaviour analysis of art--technology collaboration. in The 12th International Conference on Human--Computer Interaction. 2007. Beijing, China: Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cycling74. Max 4: Getting Started. 2001 {cited 2006 October}; Available from: http://www.synthesisters.com/download/Max4GettingStarted.pdf.Google Scholar
- Java. {cited 2006; Available from: http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/java/.Google Scholar
- Denzin, N. and Y. Lincoln, Entering the field of qualitative research, in Strategies For Qualitative Inquiry, N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, Editors. 1998, Sage: London p. 1--34.Google Scholar
- Slack, F. and J. Rowley, Observation: Perspectives on Research Methodologies for leisure Managers. Management Research News, 2001. 24(1/2): p. 35--42.Google Scholar
- Ericsson, K.A. and R.J. Crutcher, Introspection and verbal reports on cognitive processes -- two approaches to the study of thought processes: A response to Howe. New Ideas in Psychology, 1991. 9(1): p. 57--71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Suwa, M., T. Purcell, and J. Gero, Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions. Design Studies, 1998. 19(4): p. 455--483.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cross, N., H. Christiaans, and K. Dorst, Introduction: The Delft Protocols Workshop, in Analysing design activity, N. Cross, H. Christiaans, and K. Dorst, Editors. 1996, John Wiley & Sons: Baffins Lane, Chichester. p. 1--14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edmonds, E., et al. Macaroni Synthesis: A Creative Multimedia Collaboration. in The seventh international conference on information visualization (IV'03). 2003. Los Alamitos, CA.: IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Candy, L. and E.A. Edmonds. Expertise, Collaboration and Creativity for Technology Design. in Asia--Pacific Conference on Computer--Human Interaction (APCHI). 2004. Rotorua, New Zealand Springer-- Verlag.Google Scholar
- Cross, N., Designerly ways of knowing. 2006, London: Springer--Verlag.Google Scholar
- Candy, L. and E.A. Edmonds. Modeling Co--Creativity in Art and Technology. in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Creativity and Cognition. 2002. New York: ACM press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Edmonds, E.A., et al., The Studio as Laboratory: Combining Creative Practice and Digital Technology Research. International Journal of Man--Machine Studies, Special Issue on Creativity and Computational Support, 2005. 63(4): p. 452--481. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- An in-depth case study of art-technology collaboration
Recommendations
A communicative behaviour analysis of art-technology collaboration
Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Human interface: Part IIThis paper presents an approach to investigating interdisciplinary collaboration between an artist and a technologist based on case study methods. The aim of the research is to understand how artists and technologists communicate with each other during ...
Resolving assumptions in art-technology collaboration as a means of extending shared understanding
Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Human interface: Part IIThis paper extends the knowledge and understanding of art-technology collaboration. It reports upon a close empirical study of how computer programmers interacted with a digital artist to develop a computer-based interactive artwork. Analysis of the ...
Comments