ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Interactive presentation: Towards a methodology for the quantitative evaluation of automotive architectures
Full text PdfPdf (262 KB)
Source Design, Automation, and Test in Europe archive
Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe table of contents
Nice, France
SESSION: Automotive table of contents
Pages: 504 - 509  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-3-9810801-2-4
Authors
Patrick Popp  General Motors Research and Development, Warren, MI
Marco Di Natale  General Motors Research and Development, Warren, MI
Paolo Giusto  General Motors Research and Development, RedWood Shores, CA
Sri Kanajan  General Motors Research and Development, Warren, MI
Claudio Pinello  General Motors Research and Development, RedWood Shores, CA
Sponsors
: IEEE Council on Electronic Design Automation (CEDA)
: The EDA Consortium
EDAA : European Design and Automation Association
SIGDA : ACM Design Automation
RAS : RAS
: The IEEE Computer Society TTTC
: ECSI
Publisher
EDA Consortium  San Jose, CA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 87,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   

ABSTRACT

Architecture design is a critical stage of the Electronics/Controls/Software (ECS) -based vehicle design flow. Traditional approaches relying on component-level design and analysis are no longer effective as they do not always allow for the quantitative evaluation of properties arising from the composition of subsystems. This paper presents a system level architecture design methodology that is supported by tools and methods for the quantitative evaluation of key metrics of interest related to timing, dependability and cost. An example of its application to a by-wire system case study is presented, and the challenges faced in its application in the context of the actual development process are discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
<b>{Bec01}</b> Beck T., Current Trends in the Design of Automotive Electronic Systems, DATE Conference, 2001.
 
3
<b>{CAN91}</b> R. Bosch. CAN specification, version 2.0. Stuttgart, 1991.
 
4
<b>{Fle06}</b> Flexray Standard Specification available from http://www.flexray.com
 
5
<b>{Gon01}</b> M. Gonzalez Harbour et al., MAST: Modeling and Analysis Suite for Real Time Applications, ECRTS 2001.
 
6
<b>{Kaz00}</b> R. Kazman, M. Klein, P. Clements, ATAM: Method for Architecture Evaluation, Tech. Report CMU/SEI-2000-TR-004, Aug. 2000
7
 
8
<b>{OMG02}</b> UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance and Time. OMG Adopted Specification, July, 1, 2002.
 
9
 
10
<b>{Rus01}</b> J. Rushby, A Comparison of Bus Architectures for Safety-Critical Embedded Systems, CSL Technical Report, SRI International, September 2001.
 
11
<b>{Tin95}</b> K. Tindell, A. Burns, and A. J. Wellings, Calculating controller area network (can) message response times, Control Eng. Practice, v. 3 n. 8, pp. 1163--1169, 1995.
 
12
<b>{Vin02}</b> Sangiovanni Vincentelli A. Defining Platform-based Design. EEDesign of EETimes, February 2002.
 
13
Collaborative Colleagues:
Patrick Popp: colleagues
Marco Di Natale: colleagues
Paolo Giusto: colleagues
Sri Kanajan: colleagues
Claudio Pinello: colleagues