ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Managing the risk of covert information flows in virtual machine systems
Full text PdfPdf (352 KB)
Source
Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies archive
Proceedings of the 12th ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies table of contents
Sophia Antipolis, France
SESSION: Secure operating systems table of contents
Pages: 81 - 90  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-745-2
Authors
Trent Jaeger  Penn State University, University Park, PA
Reiner Sailer  IBM Research -- Watson, Hawthorne, NY
Yogesh Sreenivasan  Penn State University, University Park, PA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 264,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1266840.1266853
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Flexible mandatory access control (MAC) enforcement is now available for virtual machine systems. For example, the sHype MAC system for the Xen virtual machine monitor is part of the mainline Xen distribution. Such systems offer the isolation of VM systems with the flexible security of MAC enforcement. A problem is that such MAC VM systems will only be assured at modest levels (e.g., Common Criteria EAL4), so they may contain covert channels. Covert channels are often difficult to identify and harder to remove, so we propose an approach to manage possible covert leakage to enable verification of security guarantees. Typically, covert channels are outside of access control policies, but we propose an approach that includes both overt flows and covert flows to assess the possible risk of information leakage due to their combination. We define the concept of a risk flow policy that describes the authorized risks due to covert flows. In this paper, we evaluate the ability of four policy models to express risk flow policies. Further, we examine how such policies will be enforced in VM systems. We find that variants of the Chinese Wall model and Bell-LaPadula model have features necessary to express risk flow policies. Further, we find that such policies can be enforced in the context of sHype's Type Enforcement model.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
D. E. Bell and L. J. LaPadula. Secure computer system: Unified exposition and Multics interpretation. Technical Report ESD-TR-75-306, Deputy for Command and Management Systems, HQ Electronic Systems Division (AFSC), L. G. Hanscom Field, Bedford, MA, March 1976.
 
3
W. E. Boebert and R. Y. Kain. A practical alternative to hierarchical integrity policies. In Proceedings of the 8th National Computer Security Conference, 1985.
 
4
D. F. C. Brewer and M. J. Nash. The Chinese Wall Security Policy. In Proceedings of the 1989 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Oakland, CA, USA, May 1989.
 
5
Common criteria portal. http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/, 2007.
 
6
S. W. Devine, E. Bugnion, and M. Rosenblum. Virtualization system including a virtual machine monitor for a computer with a segmented architecture. VMWare, Inc., October 1998. US Patent No. 6397242.
 
7
 
8
P. W. L. Fong. Access control by tracking shallow execution history. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 43--55, 2004.
 
9
A. L. Herzog, J. D. Guttman, D. R. Harris, J. D. Ramsdell, A. E. Segall, and B. T. Sniffen. Policy analysis and generation work at MITRE. In Proceedings of the first Annual Security-enhanced Linux Symposium, March 2005.
 
10
W-M. Hu. Reducing timing charmers with fuzzy time. In Proc. of the 1991 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy., pages 8--20, 1991.
 
11
atsec and IBM to make Red Hat Linux a government certified trusted operating system. http://lwn.net/Articles/156140/, 2005.
12
 
13
 
14
15
16
17
 
18
 
19
J. Ligatti, L. Bauer, and D. Walker. Edit automata: Enforcement mechanisms for run-time security policies. International Journal of Information Security, 4(1-2):2--16, February 2005. (Published online 26 Oct 2004.).
 
20
T. Y. Lin. Chinese wall security policy - an aggressive model. In Proceedings Fifth Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, pages 282--289, Tucson, AZ, 1989.
 
21
 
22
 
23
R. Meushaw and D. Simard. NetTop: Commercial technology in high assurance applications. Available at: http://www.vmware.com/pdf/TechTrendNotes.pdf, 2000.
 
24
 
25
N. E. Proctor and P. G. Neumann. Architectural implications of covert channels. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Computer Security Conference, pages 28--43, October 1992.
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
30
 
31
J. Sobel and A. Alves-Foss. A trace-based model of the Chinese Wall security policy. In Proceedings of the 1999 National Information System Security Conference, 1999.
 
32
Trusted Computing Group. http://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/, March 2005.
 
33
Tresys technology, SETools policy tools for SELinux. http://www.tresys.com/selinux/selinux\_policy\_tools.shtml.
 
34
 
35

Collaborative Colleagues:
Trent Jaeger: colleagues
Reiner Sailer: colleagues
Yogesh Sreenivasan: colleagues