A digital family calendar in the home: lessons from field trials of LINC

ABSTRACT

Digital family calendars have the potential to help families coordinate, yet they must be designed to easily fit within existing routines or they will simply not be used. To understand the critical factors affecting digital family calendar design, we extended LINC, an inkable family calendar to include ubiquitous access, and then conducted a month-long field study with four families. Adoption and use of LINC during the study demonstrated that LINC successfully supported the families' existing calendaring routines without disrupting existing successful social practices. Families also valued the additional features enabled by LINC. For example, several primary schedulers felt that ubiquitous access positively increased involvement by additional family members in the calendaring routine. The field trials also revealed some unexpected findings, including the importance of mobility---both within and outside the home---for the Tablet PC running LINC.

References

1. Beech, S., Geelhoed, E., Murphy, R., Parker, J., Sellen, A., and Shaw, K. The Lifestyles of Working Parents. Report HPL-2003-88R1, HP Labs, (2004).
2. Brush A., and Turner, T. A Survey of Personal and Household Scheduling. Proc. Group 2005 Posters, ACM Press (2005), 330--331.
3. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., and Mariani, J., Informing the Development of Calendar Systems for Domestic Use. Proc. ECSCW 2003, Kluwer Academic Publishers (2003), 119--138.
4. Hoefnagels, S., Geelhoed, E., Stappers, P., Hoeben, A., and Van der Lugt, R. Friction in Scheduling and Coordination Lives of Families, In Proc. DIS 2004, ACM Press (2004), 321--324.
5. Holtzblatt, K, and Jones, S. Conducting and Analyzing a Contextual Interview, In Readings in Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd ed., R. M. Baecker, et al., Eds, Morgan Kaufman, (1995) 241--253.
6. Kelley, J. F., and Chapanis, A. How professional persons keep their calendars, Journal Occupational Psychology, Vol. 55 (1982), 241--256
7. Kincaid, C, DuPont, P, and Kaye, A. R. Electronic Calendars in the Office, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Vol. 3, No. 1, ACM Press (1985), 89--102.
8. Leslie. L., Anderson, E., and Branson, M. Responsibility for Children: The Role of Gender and Employment, Journal of Family Issues, 12(2), Sage Publications (1991), 197--210.
9. Neustaedter, C., and Brush, A. "LINC-ing" the Family: The Participatory Design of an Inkable Family Calendar. Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 141--150.
10. Neustaedter, C., Brush, A., and Greenberg, S. "The Calendar is Crucial": Coordination and Awareness through the Family Calendar, Report 2006-839-32, Dept Computer Science, University of Calgary.
11. Neustaedter, C., Elliot, K., and Greenberg, S. Interpersonal Awareness in the Domestic Realm. Proc OzCHI 2006.
12. Palen, L. Calendars on the New Frontier: Challenges of Groupware Technology. Dissertation, University of California, Irvine (1998).
13. Payne, S. Understanding Calendar Use, Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 8, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1993), 83--100
14. Plaisant, C., Bederson, B., Clamage, A., Hutchinson, H., and Druin, A. Shared Family Calendars, ACM ToCHI, 13, 3 (2006), 313--346.
15. Sellen, A., Hyams, J., and Eardley, R. The Everyday Problems of Working Parents, Report HPL-2004-37, HP Labs, 2004.
16. Tam, J. and Greenberg, S. Framework for Asynchronous Change Awareness, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, Elsevier 64(7) (2006), 583--598.
17. Taylor, A., and Swan, L. Artful Systems in the Home. Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 641--650.
18. Zimmerman, T., Haddock, S., Ziemba, S., and Rust, A. Family Organizational Labor. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 13(2--3) (2001), 65--90.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing