| Discriminative learning for differing training and test distributions |
| Full text |
Pdf
(285 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 227
archive
Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning
table of contents
Corvalis, Oregon
Pages: 81 - 88
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-793-3
|
|
Authors
|
|
Steffen Bickel
|
Max Planck Institute for Computer Science, Saarbrücken, Germany
|
|
Michael Brückner
|
Max Planck Institute for Computer Science, Saarbrücken, Germany
|
|
Tobias Scheffer
|
Max Planck Institute for Computer Science, Saarbrücken, Germany
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9, Downloads (12 Months): 76, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
We address classification problems for which the training instances are governed by a distribution that is allowed to differ arbitrarily from the test distribution---problems also referred to as classification under covariate shift. We derive a solution that is purely discriminative: neither training nor test distribution are modeled explicitly. We formulate the general problem of learning under covariate shift as an integrated optimization problem. We derive a kernel logistic regression classifier for differing training and test distributions.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Bickel, S., & Scheffer, T. (2007). Dirichlet-enhanced spam filtering based on biased samples. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
|
| |
2
|
Dudik, M., Schapire, R., & Phillips, S. (2005). Correcting sample selection bias in maximum entropy density estimation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
|
| |
3
|
Elkan, C. (2001). The foundations of cost-sensitive learning. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intellligence.
|
| |
4
|
Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153--161.
|
| |
5
|
Huang, J., Smola, A., Gretton, A., Borgwardt, K., & Schöölkopf, B. (2007). Correcting sample selection bias by unlabeled data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
|
| |
6
|
Japkowicz, N., & Stephen, S. (2002). The class imbalance problem: A systematic study. Intelligent Data Analysis, 6, 429--449.
|
| |
7
|
Manski, C., & Lerman, S. (1977). The estimation of choice probabilities from choice based samples. Econometrica, 45, 1977--1988.
|
| |
8
|
Shimodaira, H. (2000). Improving predictive inference under covariate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 90, 227--244.
|
| |
9
|
Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman & Hall, London.
|
| |
10
|
Sugiyama, M., & Müüller, K.-R. (2005). Model selection under covariate shift. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks.
|
| |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
|