ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Discriminative learning for differing training and test distributions
Full text PdfPdf (285 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 227 archive
Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning table of contents
Corvalis, Oregon
Pages: 81 - 88  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-793-3
Authors
Steffen Bickel  Max Planck Institute for Computer Science, Saarbrücken, Germany
Michael Brückner  Max Planck Institute for Computer Science, Saarbrücken, Germany
Tobias Scheffer  Max Planck Institute for Computer Science, Saarbrücken, Germany
Sponsor
: Machine Learning Journal
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 76,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1273496.1273507
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We address classification problems for which the training instances are governed by a distribution that is allowed to differ arbitrarily from the test distribution---problems also referred to as classification under covariate shift. We derive a solution that is purely discriminative: neither training nor test distribution are modeled explicitly. We formulate the general problem of learning under covariate shift as an integrated optimization problem. We derive a kernel logistic regression classifier for differing training and test distributions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bickel, S., & Scheffer, T. (2007). Dirichlet-enhanced spam filtering based on biased samples. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
 
2
Dudik, M., Schapire, R., & Phillips, S. (2005). Correcting sample selection bias in maximum entropy density estimation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
 
3
Elkan, C. (2001). The foundations of cost-sensitive learning. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intellligence.
 
4
Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153--161.
 
5
Huang, J., Smola, A., Gretton, A., Borgwardt, K., & Schöölkopf, B. (2007). Correcting sample selection bias by unlabeled data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
 
6
Japkowicz, N., & Stephen, S. (2002). The class imbalance problem: A systematic study. Intelligent Data Analysis, 6, 429--449.
 
7
Manski, C., & Lerman, S. (1977). The estimation of choice probabilities from choice based samples. Econometrica, 45, 1977--1988.
 
8
Shimodaira, H. (2000). Improving predictive inference under covariate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 90, 227--244.
 
9
Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman & Hall, London.
 
10
Sugiyama, M., & Müüller, K.-R. (2005). Model selection under covariate shift. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks.
 
11
12

Collaborative Colleagues:
Steffen Bickel: colleagues
Michael Brückner: colleagues
Tobias Scheffer: colleagues