ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Three empirical studies on estimating the design effort of Web applications
Full text PdfPdf (695 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) archive
Volume 16 ,  Issue 4  (September 2007) table of contents
Article No. 15  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:1049-331X
Authors
Luciano Baresi  Politecnico di Milano, piazza Leonardo da Vinci, Milano (Italy)
Sandro Morasca  Università degli Studi dell'Insubria, Como (Italy)
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 72,   Downloads (12 Months): 1025,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1276933.1276936
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Our research focuses on the effort needed for designing modern Web applications. The design effort is an important part of the total development effort, since the implementation can be partially automated by tools.

We carried out three empirical studies with students of advanced university classes enrolled in engineering and communication sciences curricula. The empirical studies are based on the use of W2000, a special-purpose design notation for the design of Web applications, but the hypotheses and results may apply to a wider class of modeling notations (e.g., OOHDM, WebML, or UWE). We started by investigating the relative importance of each design activity. We then assessed the accuracy of a priori design effort predictions and the influence of a few process-related factors on the effort needed for each design activity. We also analyzed the impact of attributes like the size and complexity of W2000 design artifacts on the total effort needed to design the user experience of web applications. In addition, we carried out a finer-grain analysis, by studying which of these attributes impact the effort devoted to the steps of the design phase that are followed when using W2000.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
Baresi, L., Colazzo, S., Mainetti, L., and Morasca, S. 2006. Web engineering, W2000: A modeling notation for complex Web applications. In Web Engineering, Mendes, E. and Mosley, N. Eds., Springer-Verlag, 335--364.
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
Calero, C., Ruiz, J., and, Piattini, M. 2004. A web metrics survey using WQM. In Web Engineering---4th International Conference, ICWE 2004 (Munich, Germany, July 26--30), Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3140. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 147--160.
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
COSMIC. 2003. COSMIC-FFP Measurement Manual, vers. 2.2. Common Software Measurement International Consortium. http://www.cosmicon.com.
 
15
Costagliola, G., Ferrucci, F., Gravino, C., Tortora, G., and Vitiello, G. 2004. A COSMIC-FFP based method to estimate web application development effort. In Web Engineering---4th International Conference, ICWE 2004 (Munich, Germany, July 26--30). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3140. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 161--165.
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
22
 
23
Gibbons, J. D. 1993. Nonparametric Measures of Association. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
Knapp, A., Koch, N., Zhang, G., and Hassler, H.-M. 2004. Modeling business processes in web applications with argouwe. In Proceedings of UML 2004---The Unified Modelling Language: Modelling Languages and Applications. 7th International Conference (Lisbon, Portugal, Oct. 11--15). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3273. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 69--83.
 
28
 
29
Mendes, E., Counsell, S., and Mosley, N. 2005a. Towards a taxonomy of hypermedia and web application size metrics. In Web Engineering, 5th International Conference, ICWE 2005 (Sydney, Australia, July 27--29). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3579. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 110--123.
 
30
 
31
Mendes, E. and Mosley, N. 2006. Web Engineering. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
 
32
Mendes, E., Mosley, N., and Counsell, S. 2002a. Comparison of web size measures for predicting web design and authoring effort. IEE Proc.---Softw. 149, 3, 86--92.
 
33
 
34
 
35
Mendes, E., Mosley, N., and Counsell, S. 2006. Web Engineering. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany (Chapter: Web Effort Estimation), 31--76.
 
36
Mendes, E., Watson, I., Triggs, C., Mosley, N., and Counsell, S. 2002b. A comparison of length, complexity and functionality as size measures for predicting web design and authoring effort. In Proceedings of the IEEE Metrics Symposium, 2002. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA.
 
37
38
 
39
 
40
 
41
 
42
 
43
 
44
 
45
Tukutuku Benchmarking Project 2006. Home page, http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/tukutuku/.
 
46

Collaborative Colleagues:
Luciano Baresi: colleagues
Sandro Morasca: colleagues