ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A music search engine built upon audio-based and web-based similarity measures
Full text PdfPdf (199 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
SESSION: Music retrieval table of contents
Pages: 447 - 454  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-597-7
Authors
Peter Knees  Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
Tim Pohle  Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
Markus Schedl  Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
Gerhard Widmer  Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria and Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence (OFAI)
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 37,   Downloads (12 Months): 391,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1277741.1277818
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

An approach is presented to automatically build a search engine for large-scale music collections that can be queried through natural language. While existing approaches depend on explicit manual annotations and meta-data assigned to the individual audio pieces, we automatically derive descriptions by making use of methods from Web Retrieval and Music Information Retrieval. Based on the ID3 tags of a collection of mp3 files, we retrieve relevant Web pages via Google queries and use the contents of these pages to characterize the music pieces and represent them by term vectors. By incorporating complementary information about acous tic similarity we are able to both reduce the dimensionality of the vector space and improve the performance of retrieval, i.e. the quality of the results. Furthermore, the usage of audio similarity allows us to also characterize audio pieces when there is no associated information found on the Web.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J.-J. Aucouturier. Ten Experiments on the Modelling of Polyphonic Timbre. PhD thesis, University of Paris 6, 2006.
 
2
J.-J. Aucouturier and F. Pachet. Music Similarity Measures: What's the Use? In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, Paris, France, 2002.
 
3
J.-J. Aucouturier, F. Pachet, and M. Sandler. "The Way It Sounds": Timbre Models for Analysis and Retrieval of Music Signals . IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 7(6):1028--1035, December 2005.
 
4
 
5
S. Baumann, A. Klüter, and M. Norlien. Using natural language input and audio analysis for a human-oriented mir system. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Delivering of Music, Darmstadt, Germany, 2002.
6
 
7
I. Celino, E. Della Valle, D. Cerizza, and A. Turati. Squiggle: a semantic search engine for indexing and retrieval of multimedia content. In Proceedings of the1st International Workshop on Semantic-enhanced Multimedia Presentation Systems, Athens, Greece, 2006.
 
8
O. Celma, P. Cano, and P. Herrera. Search Sounds: An audio crawler focused on weblogs. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, Victoria, B.C., Canada, 2006.
 
9
O. Celma, M. Ramirez, and P. Herrera. Foafing the music: A music recommendation system based on RSS feeds and user preferences. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, London, UK, 2005.
 
10
11
 
12
M. Goto and T. Goto. Musicream: New Music Playback Interface for Streaming, Sticking, and Recalling Musical Pieces. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, London, UK, 2005.
13
 
14
P. Knees, E. Pampalk, and G. Widmer. Artist Classification with Web-based Data. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, Barcelona, Spain, 2004.
15
 
16
I. Knopke. Aroooga: An audio search engine for the world wide web. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, Miami, USA, 2004.
17
 
18
M. Mandel and D. Ellis. Song-Level Features and Support Vector Machines for Music Classification. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, London, UK, 2005.
 
19
F. Pachet and D. Cazaly. A Taxonomy of Musical Genres. In Proceedings of RIAO 2000 Content-Based Multimedia Information Access, Paris, France, 2000.
 
20
E. Pampalk. Computational Models of Music Similarity and their Application to Music Information Retrieval. PhD thesis, Vienna University of Technology, March 2006.
 
21
E. Pampalk and M. Goto. Musicrainbow: A new user interface to discover artists using audio-based similarity and web-based labeling. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, Victoria, B.C., Canada, 2006.
 
22
T. Pohle, P. Knees, M. Schedl, and G. Widmer. Automatically Adapting the Structure of Audio Similarity Spaces. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Learning the Semantics of Audio Signals, Athens, Greece, 2006.
 
23
 
24
 
25
B. Whitman and S. Lawrence. Inferring Descriptions and Similarity for Music from Community Metadata. In Proceedings of the 2002 International Computer Music Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2002.
 
26


Collaborative Colleagues:
Peter Knees: colleagues
Tim Pohle: colleagues
Markus Schedl: colleagues
Gerhard Widmer: colleagues