skip to main content
10.1145/1278480.1278624acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Performance modeling and optimization for single- and multi-wall carbon nanotube interconnects

Published:04 June 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Based on physical circuit models the performances of signal and power interconnects at the local, semi-global and global levels are modeled at 100°C. For local signal interconnects, replacing copper wires with a typical aspect ratio of 2 by thin SWNT interconnects can lower power dissipation by 50%. This would also improve their speed by up to 50% by the end of the ITRS. Copper wires and large diameter MWNTs offer the lowest resistance for power distribution in the first and second interconnect levels, respectively. SWNT-bundles and MWNTs can be used to lower the delay of signal interconnects in semi-global levels. MWNTs with diameters of 50nm and 100nm can potentially increase the bandwidth density of global interconnects by up to 50% and 100%, respectively.

References

  1. T. Sakurai, "Perspectives on power-aware electronics," in IEEE ISSCC, 2003, pp. 26--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), 2005 ed.: Semiconductor Industry Assoc., 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. Sarvari, A. Naeemi, R. Venkatesan, and J. D. Meindl, "Impact of size effects on the resistivity of copper wires and consequently the design and performance of metal interconnect networks," in IEEE Inter. Interconnect Tech. Conf., 2005, pp. 197--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A. Naeemi, R. Sarvari, and J. D. Meindl, "On-chip interconnect networks at the end of the roadmap: limits and nanotechnology opportunities," in Proc. IEEE Int. Interconnect Tech. Conf., 2006, pp. 201--203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and P. Avouris, Carbon nanotubes: synthesis, structure, properties, and applications. Berlin; New York:: Springer, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Naeemi and J. D. Meindl, "Design and performance modeling for single-walled carbon nanotubes as local, semiglobal, and global interconnects in gigascale integrated systems," IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 54, pp. 26--37, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. Nihei, D. Kondo, A. Kawabata, S. Sato, H. Shioya, M. Sakaue, T. Iwai, M. Ohfuti, and Y. Awano, "Low-resistance multi-walled carbon nanotube vias with parallel channel conduction of inner shells," in Proc. IEEE Int. Interconnect Tech. Conf., 2005, pp. 234--236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Vajtai, W. Bingqing, J. Yung Joon, C. Anyuan, S. K. Biswas, G. Ramanath, and P. M. Ajayan, "Building and testing organized architectures of carbon nanotubes," IEEE Trans. Nanotechnology, vol. 2, pp. 355--361, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Nieuwoudt and Y. Massoud, "Understanding the impact of inductance in carbon nanotube bundles for VLSI interconnects using scalable modeling techniques," IEEE Trans. Nanotechnology, vol. 5, pp. 758--765, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Naeemi and J. D. Meindl, "Compact physical models for multiwall carbon-nanotube interconnects," IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 27, pp. 338--340, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A. Javey, J. Guo, M. Paulsson, Q. Wang, D. Mann, M. Lundstrom, and H. Dai, "High-field quasiballistic transport in short carbon nanotubes," Physical Review Letters, vol. 92, pp. 106804--4, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. W. Liang, M. Bockrath, D. Bozovic, J. H. Hafner, M. Tinkham, and H. Park, "Fabry-Perot interference in a nanotube electron waveguide," Nature, vol. 411, pp. 665--669, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. O. Hjortstam, P. Isberg, S. Söderholm, and H. Dai, "Can we achieve ultra-low resistivity in carbon nanotube-based metal composites?," Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, vol. V78, pp. 1175--1179, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Naeemi and J. D. Meindl, "Physical modeling of temperature coefficient of resistance for single- and multi-wall carbon nanotube interconnects," IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 28, pp. 135--138, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J. Jiang, R. Saito, G. G. Samsonidze, S. G. Chou, A. Jorio, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, "Electron-phonon matrix elements in single-wall carbon nanotubes," Physical Review B (Condensed Matter and Materials Physics), vol. 72, pp. 235408--11, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. E. Pop, D. Mann, J. Reifenberg, K. Goodson, and H. Dai, "Electro-thermal transport in metallic single-wall carbon nanotubes for interconnect applications," in IEEE IEDM Digst., 2005, pp. 253--256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. A. Naeemi and J. D. Meindl, "Impact of electron-phonon scattering on the performance of carbon nanotube interconnects for GSI," IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 26, pp. 476--478, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. W. Bockrath, "Carbon nanotubes: electrons in one dimension," Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. California, Berekeley, CA, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A. A. Maarouf, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, "Electronic structure of carbon nanotube ropes," Physical Review B, vol. 61, p. 11156, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. H. Stahl, J. Appenzeller, R. Martel, P. Avouris, and B. Lengeler, "Intertube coupling in ropes of single-wall carbon nanotubes," Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, p. 5186, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. RAPHAEL: Interconnect Analysis Program: TMA Inc., 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A. Naeemi and J. Meindl, "Carbon nanotube interconnects," in IEEE Int. Symp. PhysicalDesign, Austin, TX, 2007, pp. 77--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. Naeemi and J. D. Meindl, "Monolayer metallic nanotube interconnects: promising candidates for short local interconnects," IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 26, pp. 544--546, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. A. Naeemi and J. Meindl, "Performance Modeling for Carbon Nanotube Interconnects in On-chip Power Distribution," in IEEE Electronic Components and Techn. Conf., Reno, Nevada, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. A. Naeemi, J. A. Davis, and J. D. Meindl, "Compact physical models for multilevel interconnect crosstalk in gigascale integration (GSI)," IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 51, pp. 1902--1912, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Performance modeling and optimization for single- and multi-wall carbon nanotube interconnects

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        DAC '07: Proceedings of the 44th annual Design Automation Conference
        June 2007
        1016 pages
        ISBN:9781595936271
        DOI:10.1145/1278480

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 June 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        DAC '07 Paper Acceptance Rate152of659submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

        Upcoming Conference

        DAC '24
        61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
        June 23 - 27, 2024
        San Francisco , CA , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader