ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Maximizing lifetime of sensor surveillance systems
Full text PdfPdf (1.42 MB)
Source IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON) archive
Volume 15 ,  Issue 2  (April 2007) table of contents
Pages: 334 - 345  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:1063-6692
Authors
Hai Liu  Department of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Xiaohua Jia  Department of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Peng-Jun Wan  Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL
Chih-Wei Yi  Department of Computer Science, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, R.O.C.
S. Kami Makki  Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
Niki Pissinou  Telecommunications and Information Technology Institute, Florida International University, Miami, FL
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 179,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: 10.1109/TNET.2007.892883

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses the maximal lifetime scheduling problem in sensor surveillance systems. Given a set of sensors and targets in an area, a sensor can watch only one target at a time, our task is to schedule sensors to watch targets and forward the sensed data to the base station, such that the lifetime of the surveillance system is maximized, where the lifetime is the duration that all targets are watched and all active sensors are connected to the base station. We propose an optimal solution to find the target-watching schedule for sensors that achieves the maximal lifetime. Our solution consists of three steps: 1) computing the maximal lifetime of the surveillance system and a workload matrix by using the linear programming technique; 2) decomposing the workload matrix into a sequence of schedule matrices that can achieve the maximal lifetime; and 3) determining the sensor surveillance trees based on the above obtained schedule matrices, which specify the active sensors and the routes to pass sensed data to the base station. This is the first time in the literature that the problem of maximizing lifetime of sensor surveillance systems has been formulated and the optimal solution has been found.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
[1] C.-Y. Chong and S. P. Kumar, "Sensor networks: Evolution, opportunities, and challenges," Proc. IEEE, vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 1247-1256, Aug. 2003.
2
3
 
4
[4] Y. Zhao, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin, "Residual energy scans for monitoring wireless sensor networks," in Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conf., 2002, pp. 356-362.
 
5
[5] S. Mao and Y. T. Hou, "BeamStar: A new low-cost data routing protocol for wireless sensor networks," presented at the IEEE Globecom, Dallas, TX, 2004.
 
6
[6] W. Choi and S. K. Das, "Trade-off between coverage and data reporting latency for energy-conserving data gathering in wireless sensor networks," presented at the 1st IEEE Int. Conf. Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS 2004), Fort Lauderdale, FL, Oct. 2004.
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
[10] N. Sadagopan and B. Krishnamachari, "ACQUIRE: The acquire mechanism for efficient querying in sensor networks," in Proc. 1st IEEE Int. Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Application (SNPA), 2003, pp. 149-155.
11
 
12
[12] M. Bhardwaj, T. Garnett, and A. Chandrakasan, "Upper bounds on the lifetime of sensor networks," in IEEE Int. Conf. Communications, 2001, pp. 785-790.
 
13
[13] J. Chang and L. Tassiulas, "Maximum lifetime routing in wireless sensor networks," presented at the Advanced Telecommunications and Information Distribution Research Program (ATIRP'2000), College Park, MD, Mar. 2000.
 
14
[14] T. Melodia, D. Pompili, and I. F. Akyildiz, "Optimal local topology knowledge for energy efficient geographical routing in sensor networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2004, pp. 1705-1716.
 
15
[15] N. Sadagopan and B. Krishnamachari, "Maximizing data extraction in energy-limited sensor networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2004, pp. 1717-1727.
 
16
[16] G. Zussman and A. Segall, "Energy efficient routing in ad hoc disaster recovery networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2003, pp. 682-691.
 
17
[17] J. Carle and D. Simplot-Ryl, "Energy-efficient area monitoring for sensor networks," IEEE Computer, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 40-46, Feb. 2004.
 
18
[18] C. F. Chiasserini and M. Garetto, "Modeling the performance of wireless sensor networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2004, pp. 220-231.
19
 
20
21
 
22
[22] H. J. Ryser, Combinational Mathematics. Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America, 1963, pp. 58-59.
 
23
[23] R. A. Brualdi and H. J. Ryser, Combinatorial Matrix Theory. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991, pp. 9-10.
 
24
[24] D. B. West, Introduction to Graph Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996, pp. 109-111.
 
25
[25] S. Axler, F. W. Gehring, and K. A. Ribet, Graph Theory, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2000.
 
26
[26] R. Gould, Graph Theory. Boston, MA: Benjamin/Cummings, 1988, pp. 198-209.
27
 
28
[28] Q. Li and D. Rus, "Global clock synchronization in sensor networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2004, pp. 214-226.
29
 
30
[30] Z. Zhou, S. R. Das, and H. Gupta, "Connected K-coverage problem in sensor networks," in Proc. ICCCN 2004, pp. 373-378.
 
31
[31] H. Liu, P. Wan, C.-W. Yi, X. Jia, S. Makki, and P. Niki, "Maximal lifetime scheduling in sensor surveillance networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Miami, FL, 2005, pp. 2482-2491.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Hai Liu: colleagues
Xiaohua Jia: colleagues
Peng-Jun Wan: colleagues
Chih-Wei Yi: colleagues
S. Kami Makki: colleagues
Niki Pissinou: colleagues