skip to main content
10.1145/1281192.1281214acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Discovering the hidden structure of house prices with a non-parametric latent manifold model

Published:12 August 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

In many regression problems, the variable to be predicted depends not only on a sample-specific feature vector, but also on an unknown (latent) manifold that must satisfy known constraints. An example is house prices, which depend on the characteristics of the house, and on the desirability of the neighborhood, which is not directly measurable. The proposed method comprises two trainable components. The first one is a parametric model that predicts the "intrinsic" price of the house from its description. The second one is a smooth, non-parametric model of the latent "desirability" manifold. The predicted price of a house is the product of its intrinsic price and desirability. The two components are trained simultaneously using a deterministic form of the EM algorithm. The model was trained on a large dataset of houses from Los Angeles county. It produces better predictions than pure parametric and non-parametric models. It also produces useful estimates of the desirability surface at each location.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p173-chopra-200.mov

mov

31.5 MB

p173-chopra-768.mov

mov

106.1 MB

References

  1. P. M. Anglin and R. Gencay. Semiparametric estimation of a hedonic price function. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11:633--648, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S. Basu and T. G. Thibodeau. Analysis of spatial autocorrelation in home prices. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 16(1):61--85, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. G. E. P. Box and D. R. Cox. An analysis of transformations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, B26:211--243, 1964.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Can. The measurement of neighborhood dynamics in urban house prices. Economic Geography, 66(3):254--272, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A. Can. Specification and estimation of hedonic housing price models. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22:453--474, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. M. Clapp. A semiparametric method for estimating local house price indices. Real Estate Economics, 32:127--160, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Dempster, N. Laird, and D. Rubin. Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, B39:1--38, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Q. Do and G. Grudnitski. A neural network approach to residential property appraisal. Real Estate Appraiser, 58(3):38--45, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. R. A. Dubin. Spatial autocorrelation and neighborhood quality. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22:432--452, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. E. Gelfand, M. D. Ecker, J. R. Knight, and C. F. Sirmans. The dynamics of location in home prices. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 29(2):149--166, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A. C. Goodman. Hedonic prices, price indices and housing markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 5:471--484, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. R. Halvorsen and H. O. Pollakowski. Choice of functional form for hedonic price equations. Journal of Urban Economics, 10:37--49, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. T. Kauko. Modeling Locational Determinants of House Prices: Neural Network and Value Tree Approaches. PhD thesis, Utrecht University, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. T. Kohonen. Self organizing maps. Springer Verlag, Germany, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Y. LeCun, S. Chopra, R. Hadsell, F. J. Huang, and M. Ranzato. A tutorial on energy-based learning. In B. et al, editor, Predicting Structured Outputs. MIT Press, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. R. Meese and N. Wallace. Nonparametric estimation of dynamic hedonic price models and the construction of residential housing price indices. AREUEA Journal, 19(3):308--331, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. N. Nguyen and A. Cripps. Predicting housing value: A comparison of multiple regression analysis and artificial neural networks. The Journal of Real Estate Research, 22(3):313--336, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. K. R. Pace, R. Barry, J. M. Clapp, and M. Rodriquez. Spatio-temporal autoregressive models of neighbourhood effects. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17(1):15--33, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. K. R. Pace and O. Gilley. Using the spatial configuration of the data to improve estimation. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 14(3):333--340, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Discovering the hidden structure of house prices with a non-parametric latent manifold model

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        KDD '07: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
        August 2007
        1080 pages
        ISBN:9781595936097
        DOI:10.1145/1281192

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 August 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        KDD '07 Paper Acceptance Rate111of573submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader