skip to main content
10.1145/1282100.1282112acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Asymptotically optimal repeated auctions for sponsored search

Published:19 August 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

We investigate asymptotically optimal keyword auctions, that is, auctions which maximize revenue as the number of bidders grows. We do so under two alternative behavioral assumptions. The first explicitly models the repeated nature of keyword auctions. It introduces a novel assumption on individual bidding, namely that bidders never overbid their value, and bid their actual value if shut out for long enough. Under these conditions we present a broad class of repeated auctions that are asymptotically optimal among all sequential auctions (a superset of repeated auctions). Those auctions have varying payment schemes but share the ranking method. The Google auction belongs to this class, but not the Yahoo auction, and indeed we show that the latter is not asymptotically optimal. (Nonetheless, with some additional distributional assumptions, the Yahoo auction can be shown to belong to a broad category of auctions that are asymptotically optimal among all auction mechanisms that do not rely on ad relevance.) We then look at the one-shot keyword auction, which can be taken to model repeated auctions in which relatively myopic bidders converge on the equilibrium of the full-information stage game. In this case we show that the Google auction remains asymptotically optimal and the Yahoo auction suboptimal. The distributional assumptions under which our theorems hold are quite general. We do however show that the Google auction is not asymptotically revenue-maximizing for general distributions.

References

  1. G. Aggarwal, A. Goel, and R. Motwani. Truthful auctions for pricing search keywords. Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pages 1--7, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. Edelman and M. Ostrovsky. Strategic bidder behavior in sponsored search auctions. Working paper, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. B. Edelman, M. Ostrovsky, and M. Schwarz. Internet Advertising and the Generalized Second Price Auction: Selling Billions of Dollars Worth of Keywords. NBER Working paper 11765, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Feng, H. Bhargava, and D. Pennock. Implementing Sponsored Search in Web Search Engines: Computational Evaluation of Alternative Mechanisms. Informs Journal on Computing, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. Iyengar and A. Kumar. Characterizing optimal keyword auctions. Second Workshop on Sponsored Search Auctions, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Lahaie. An analysis of alternative slot auction designs for sponsored search. Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pages 218--227, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. Myerson. Optimal Auction Design. Math. Oper. Res., 6(1):58--73, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. H. Varian. Position auctions. Working Paper, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Asymptotically optimal repeated auctions for sponsored search

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEC '07: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Electronic commerce
      August 2007
      482 pages
      ISBN:9781595937001
      DOI:10.1145/1282100

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 August 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate150of244submissions,61%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader