Through the eyes of instructors: a phenomenographic investigation of student success

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present a phenomenographic analysis of computer science instructors' perceptions of student success. The factors instructors believe influence student success fell into five categories which were related to: 1) the subject being taught, 2) intrinsic characteristics of the student, 3) student background, 4) student attitudes and behaviour and 5) instructor influence on student development. These categories provide insights not only into how instructors perceive students, but also how they perceive their own roles in the learning process. We found significant overlap between these qualitative results, obtained through analysis of semi-structured interviews, and the vast body of quantitative research on factors predicting student success. Studying faculty rather than students provides an alternative way to examine these questions, and using qualitative methods may provide a richer understanding of student success factors.

References

1. M. Ben-Ari. Constructivism in computer science education. In SIGCSE '98: Proc. of the twenty-ninth SIGCSE technical symposium on Comp. sci. educ., pages 257--261, 1998.
2. J. Bennedsen and M. Caspersen. An investigation of potential success factors for an introductory model-driven programming course. In Proc. of the 1st Intl. Computing Education Research Workshop (ICER 2005), pages 155--164, 2005.
3. J. Bennedsen and M. E. Caspersen. Abstraction ability as an indicator of success for learning object-oriented programming? SIGCSE Bull., 38(2):39--43, 2006.
4. S. Bergin and R. Reilly. Programming: factors that influence success. SIGCSE Bull., 37(1):411--415, 2005.
5. S. Bergin, R. Reilly, and D. Traynor. Examining the role of self-regulated learning on introductory programming performance. In ICER '05: Proc. of the 2005 Intl. workshop on Computing education research, pages 81--86, 2005.
6. A. Berglund and M. Wiggberg. Students learn CS in different ways: insights from an empirical study. In ITICSE '06: Proc. of the 11th annual SIGCSE conf. on Innovation and technology in comp. sci. education, pages 265--269, 2006.
7. J. Biggs. What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1):57--75, 1999.
8. C. Bishop-Clark and D. D. Wheeler. The Myers-Briggs personality type and its relationship to computer programming. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2):358--371, Spring 1994.
9. R. Boyle, J. Carter, and M. Clark. What Makes Them Succeed? Entry, progression and graduation in Computer Science. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26(1):3--18, 2002.
10. P. Byrne and G. Lyons. The effect of student attributes on success in programming. In ITiCSE '01: Proc. of the 6th annual conf. on Innovation and technology in comp. sci. education, pages 49--52, 2001.
11. S. Dehnadi and R. Bornat. The camel has two humps (working title). Draft paper. Retrieved at http://www.cs.mdx.ac.uk/research/PhDArea/saeed/paper1.pdf, 2/23/07, February 2006.
12. E. Dijkstra. On the cruelty of really teaching computer science. Commun. ACM, 32(12):1398--1404, 1989.
13. A. Eckerdal and A. Berglund. What does it take to learn 'programming thinking'? In Proc. of the 1st Intl. Computing Education Research Workshop (ICER 2005), pages 135--143, 2005.
14. A. Eckerdal and M. Thuné. Novice java programmers' conceptions of "object" and "class", and variation theory. In ITiCSE '05: Proc. of the 10th annual SIGCSE conf. on Innovation and technology in comp. sci. education, pages 89--93, 2005.
15. D. Fox. Personal theories of teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 8(2):151--163, 1983.
16. A. Goold and R. Rimmer. Factors affecting performance in first-year computing. SIGCSE Bull., 32(2):39--43, 2000.
17. O. Hazzan. How Students Attempt to Reduce Abstraction in the Learning of Mathematics and in the Learning of Computer Science. Computer Science Education, 13(2):95--122, June 2003.
18. B. Johnson and L. Christensen. Educational Research. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Pearson, Boston, 2004.
19. P. Kansanen. Teaching as teaching-studying-learning interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43(1):81--89, 1999.
20. P. Kansanen. Studying -- the realistic bridge between instruction and learning. an attempt to a conceptual whole of the teaching-studying-learning process. Educational Studies, 29(2/3):221--232, 2003.
21. P. Kansanen and M. Meri. The didactic relation in the teaching-studying-learning process. In B. Hudson, F. Buchberger, P. Kansanen, and H. Seel, editors, Didaktik/Fachdidaktik as Science(-s)of the Teaching profession, pages 107--116. TNTEE Publications, 1999.
22. J. Kramer. Is abstraction the key to computing? Commun. of the ACM, 50(4):36--42, 2007.
23. R. Lister, A. Berglund, I. Box, C. Cope, A. Pears, C. Avram, M. Bower, A. Carbone, B. Davey, M. de Raadt, B. Doyle, S. Fitzgerald, L. Mannila, C. Kutay, M. Peltomaki, J. Sheard, Simon, K. Sutton, D. Traynor, J. Tutty, and A. Venables. Differing ways that computing academics understand teaching. In Proc. of the Ninth Australasian Comp. Educ. Conf. (ACE2007), 2007.
24. R. Lister, I. Box, B. Morrison, J. Tenenberg, and D. S. Westbrook. The dimensions of variation in the teaching of data structures. In ITiCSE '04: Proc. of the 9th annual SIGCSE conf. on Innovation and technology in comp. sci. education, pages 92--96, 2004.
25. R. Mancy and N. Reid. Aspects of cognitive style and programming. In E. Dunican and T. Green, editors, Proc. of the 16th Workshop of the Psycology of Programming Interest Group, pages 1--9, 2004.
26. F. Marton and S. Booth. Learning and Awareness. Lawrence Erbaum Assoc., Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1997.
27. L. Murphy, B. Richards, R. McCauley, B. B. Morrison, S. Westbrook, and T. Fossum. Women catch up: gender differences in learning programming concepts. In SIGCSE '06: Proc. of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Comp. sci. educ., pages 17--21, 2006.
28. B. T. Pioro. Introductory computer programming: gender, major, discrete mathematics, and calculus. J. Comput. Small Coll., 21(5):123--129, 2006.
29. A. Robins, J. Rountree, and N. Rountree. Learning and teaching programming: A review and discussion. Computer Science Education, 13(2):137--172, 2003.
30. N. Rountree, J. Rountree, A. Robins, and R. Hannah. Interacting factors that predict success and failure in a CS1 course. SIGCSE Bull., 36(4):101--104, 2004.
31. C. Schulte and J. Magenheim. Novices' expectations and prior knowledge of software development: results of a study with high school students. In Proc. of the 1st Intl. Computing Education Research Workshop (ICER 2005), pages 143--153, 2005.
32. Simon, S. Fincher, A. Robins, B. Baker, I. Box, Q. Cutts, M. de Raadt, P. Haden, J. Hamer, M. Hamilton, R. Lister, M. Petre, K. Sutton, D. Tolhurst, and J. Tutty. Predictors of success in a first programming course. In ACE '06: Proc. of the 8th Austalian conf. on Comp. educ., pages 189--196, 2006.
33. H. G. Taylor and L. C. Moundfield. Exploration of the relationship between prior computing experience and gender on success in college computer science. Educational Computing Research, 11(4):291--306, 1994.
34. L. Thomas, M. Ratcliffe, J. Woodbury, and E. Jarman. Learning styles and performance in the introductory programming sequence. In SIGCSE '02: Proc. of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Comp. sci. educ., pages 33--37, 2002.
35. S. Turkle and S. Papert. Epistemological pluralism and the revaluation of the concrete. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11:3--33, 1992.
36. P. Ventura and B. Ramamurthy. Wanted: CS1 students. no experience required. SIGCSE Bull., 36(1):240--244, 2004.
37. P. R. Ventura. Identifying Predictors of Success for an Objects-First CS1. Computer Science Education, 15(3):223--243, 2005.
38. S. Wiedenbeck. Factors affecting the success of non-majors in learning to program. In Proc. of the 1st Intl. Computing Education Research Workshop (ICER 2005), pages 13--24, 2005.
39. B. C. Wilson. A study of factors promoting success in computer science including gender differences. Computer Science Education, 12(1-2):141--164, 2002.
40. B. C. Wilson and S. Shrock. Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: a study of twelve factors. SIGCSE Bull., 33(1):184--188, 2001.
41. J. M. Wolfe. Perspectives on testing for programming aptitude. In Proc. of the 1971 26th annual conf., pages 268--277, 1971.
42. M. Xenos, C. Pierrakeas, and P. Pintelas. A survey on student dropout rates and dropout causes concerning the students in the Course of Informatics of the Hellenic Open University. Computers & Education, 39:361--194, 2002.
43. G. S. Åkerlind. Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4):321--334, 2005.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computing education programs

        • Computer science education