skip to main content
10.1145/1294046.1294104acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

From the silent generation to generation x, y and z: strategies for managing the generation mix

Published:07 October 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Today's workplaces are not only culturally diverse, but also generationally diverse. The Silent generation (pre World War II), the Baby Boom generation (1946-1962), Generation X (1963-1977), and Generation Y (1978-1986), all have different workplace values and needs. This can create a challenge for the manager who works with a generational mix of team members. Today's younger employees have different values and needs than those of their more "traditional" colleagues of the Silent and Baby Boom generations. For example, Generation X and Y employees saw their Baby Boom parents work so much that often family was neglected and, for all of the overtime hours of work, see their parents still struggle with retirement decisions and finances. These were the "latch-key" children and so younger generations want a balance between work and a personal life. They will not give up all of their personal time for the benefit of their employer like their parents.

When you examine the various characteristics of each generation and understand their life experiences, you can see what has shaped their roles in today's workplace. Each generation's values are different and understanding these differences, while identifying misconceptions, can lead you to successfully managing this diverse group.

References

  1. Beld, J., Millichap, N., and Sanford, C. Crossing Boundaries: Collaborating to Assess Information Literacy, Presentation at ACRL, March 30, 2007. Retrieved from http://www.nitle.org/index.php/nitle/content/view/full/1586.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogan, K. College Students Fall Short in Demonstrating the ICT Literacy Skills Necessary for Success in College and the Workplace. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/ictliteracy/preliminaryfindings.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fears, L. (Ed). Objects of Affection. Family Circle, 120, 7 (June 2007), 30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Friesner, B. Answering the Call: Millennials Plugged in and Plugging Away, In Indiana Alumni Magazine, May/June 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Howe, N. and Strauss, W. Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. Vintage, New York, NY, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Howe, N. and Strauss, W. Author Q&A, from http://www.randonhouse.com/vintage/catalog/display.pperl?isbn9780375707193&view=89Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Huntley, R. The World According to Y: Inside the new adult generation. Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest, Australia, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Janis, D. and Kincaid, R. (Eds.) The Journal of Student Employment, 7, 1 (Winter 1995). Retrieved from http://www.mu.edu/financialaid/ses/supermanual.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Martin, C. and Tulgan, B. Managing Generation Y: Global Citizens Born in the Late Seventies and Early Eighties. HRD Press, Amherst, MA, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Martin, C. and Tulgan, B. Managing the Generation Mix: From Collision to Collaboration. HRD Press, Amherst, MA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Nagle, Terri, "Coaching Generation X" Center for Coaching & Mentoring, Inc., update: October 17, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Oblinger, D. G. and Oblinger, J. (Eds.) Educating the Net Generation. EDUCAUSE, Boulder, CO, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Raines, Claire, Beyond Generation X: A Practical Guide For Managers, Crisp Publications, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Salaway, G., Katz, R. N., and Caruso, J. The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2006. EDUCAUSE, Boulder, CO, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Tulgan, Bruce, The Manager's Pocket Guide To Generation X. HRD Press, Amherst, MA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Windham, C. Father Google & Mother IM: Confessions of a Net Gen Learner. EDUCAUSE Review, 40, 5 (September/October 2005), 43--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. The People History 1978 retrieved from http://www.thepeoplehistory.com, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Marketing to the ME Generation http://marketing.mcdar.net/33793.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Boomer backlash http://www.dailycamera.com/news/2007/may/05/boomer-backlash/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Growing Bolder http://www.growingbolder.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=15500&ATCLID=829117Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002185894_boomers21.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. From the silent generation to generation x, y and z: strategies for managing the generation mix

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGUCCS '07: Proceedings of the 35th annual ACM SIGUCCS fall conference
      October 2007
      390 pages
      ISBN:9781595936349
      DOI:10.1145/1294046

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 October 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate123of170submissions,72%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader