- 1 BenbaSat, 1., Dexter, A.S., Drury,: D.H., and Goldstein, R.C. A critique ofthe!stage hypothesis: Theory and :empirical evidence. Com~ mun. ACM 2:7, 5(May t:984), 476- 4:85. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 2 Bjern-Anderson, N. and Davis, G.B. :Eds. Information Systems A:sseSs;: merit Issues and Challenges: Elsevier Science, Inc.,N.Y,, 11988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3 Boland, RJ. iand Hirschheim:, R:A. Information systems strategy formulation. In Criticat lssues in Information Systeras Research, RJ. Boland and R~A. Hirschheim, Eds. John Wiley & Sons, N.Y. 1987, 157-178. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4 Boynton, A.C. :and Zmud, R.W. Information technology planning in :the 1990's: Directions for practice and research; MIS Q. I1, I (Mar: 1987), 59~71.Google Scholar
- 5 Brancheau, J.C. and: Wet herbe, J;C. Key issues in :information-systems management. MIS Q;. li, I (Mar: 1987), 23-45.Google Scholar
- 6 Campbell,. J~P, On the Nature of Organizational Effectiveness. New Perspectives:: on Organizational: Effec, tiveness; P.S.: Goodman and J M: Pennings, Eds. San Francisco, Calif.: Josey-Bass: Publishing:, 1977, 13-35.Google Scholar
- 7 Cohen, M.D March, J;G:. and Olsen, J.P, A garbage canmode:l of' organizational choice:; Admin. ScL Q, 17,. I (Jan. !972):, 1-2.5.Google Scholar
- 8 Guimaraes, T. and .Ramanujam, V. Personal computing, trends :and problems: An empirical study: MIS Q. 10, 2 (June:1986), 1179-186'.Google Scholar
- 9 Hartog, C. and. Herbert, M. 1:9-85 Opinion survey-of M!S managers: Key issues. MIS 'Q. I0; 4 (Dec'. 1986), 35'1.-.361. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10 H:uff, S.L. and M unro,-:M.C. Infof mation tech:nology assessment and adoption:: A.field study, MIS Q.9;~ 4 (Dec:. i985), 327-339, Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11 lvari, J, Implementability of in, house developed vs, application package based informat:ion: systems; In Proceedings of lCIS (198:6), 67'80.Google Scholar
- 12 Kerlinger, F:N Foumiat'ions of Be. havioratR:esearch, 3rd ed. N.Y., :N.Y. Holt, Rinehart and Winston In:c. 1986.Google Scholar
- 13 King, J.L, and Kraemer, K.L E vo-: lution and organizational information systems: An assessment of Nol. an,s stage model. Commun; ACM 27, 5 (May 1984), 466.475. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14 KleijnemJ.P.C. Computers and Pr0fits:: Quantifying Financial Benefits: 4 Information. Addison-Wesley, Reading:, Mass., t980.z Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15 Leifer, /R.: Matching :computer. based information :systems with organizational structures.: MIS Q~ 12, i (Mar. 1988), 63-73. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16 Lucus, H.C Jr,,/Walton, E J. and Ginzberg, :MJ. Implementingpack* aged software; MIS Q. 12,4 (Dec. 1988); 537-549. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17 Lynch, R.K. Implementing packaged application software: Hidden costs and new chailenges. Syst. Olq. SolutionS: 4, 4 (Nov. 1:984), 227~234.Google Scholar
- 18 Nolan, R~L:. Managing the computer resource: A stage hypothesis, Commun. ACM 16, 7 (July: 1973), 399-405. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19 Raho, LEE., BelOhla:v, J.A., and Fiedler, KiD, Assimilating new technology into the organization: An assessment of McFarlan and McKenney's model. MIS ::Q. 11, 1 (Mar. 1987), 47~-57.Google Scholar
- 20 Rivard, S. and Huff, Si. Factors :of success for end-user computing~ Commun. ACM 31, :5 (.May 1988), 552-56L Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21 Rockart, J,F. The line takes the leadership: IS management in a wired society: Sloan Ma:nage. R~, 29, 3 (Summer 1988):, 57:-64,Google Scholar
- 22 Rockart, J.E and Flannery, LS. The management of end user computin~, Commun. ACi~I 26, 10 (Sept. 1983), 276-284, Google ScholarDigital Library
- 23 Zmud, R.:W.: Design alternatives for organizing information systems activities. MIS Q. 8, 2 (June 1984)i, 79-84.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Corporate systems management: an overview and research perspective
Comments