ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Agency, invention, and sympatric design platforms
Full text PdfPdf (221 KB)
Source
ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communication archive
Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication table of contents
El Paso, Texas, USA
SESSION: Teaching and learning DOC table of contents
Pages: 49 - 54  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-588-5
Author
Brian J. McNely  University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX
Sponsors
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 81,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1297144.1297157
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This project investigates the problems associated with course software platforms from the perspective of user-centered design, examining student agency and invention specifically in environments like WebCT, Wikis, and MS SharePoint 3.0. I argue for course design platforms that are structured on informed technogogies at the instructor and curricular levels. Drawing on concepts from biological evolution and anthropology, I propose that instructors, researchers, and administrators promote and create design platforms that are sympatric, that foster student agency and invention through user localization technologies that also embrace rhetorically complex social interaction. I further argue that researchers in Rhetoric and Writing Studies are particularly well positioned to write and/or co-create sympatric course platforms.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Porter, J. E., and Sullivan, P. A. Repetition and the rhetoric of visual design. In C. Handa (Ed.), Visual rhetoric in a digital world: A critical sourcebook, (pp. 290--302). Bedford/St. Martin's, Boston, 2004.
 
2
Selfe, C. L., and Selfe, R. J., Jr. The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. In Johnson-Eilola, J. and Selber, S. (Eds.), Central works in technical communication, (pp. 428--445). Oxford University Press, 2004.
 
3
Johnson-Eilola, J. The database and the essay: Understanding composition as articulation. In A. F. Wysocki, J. Johnson-Eilola, C. L. Selfe, and G. Sirc (Eds.), Writing new media: Theory and applications for expanding the teaching of composition (pp. 199--235). Utah State University Press, Logan, UT, 2004.
 
4
Wysocki, A. F. Awaywithwords: On the possibilities in unavailable designs. Computers and Composition, 22, 55--62.
 
5
Porter, J. E. Recovering delivery for digital rhetoric and human-computer interaction. Keynote presentation at the 20th Penn State Conference on Rhetoric and Composition, State College, PA, 2007.
 
6
Selber, S. A. Multiliteracies for a digital age. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL, 2004.
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
Foster, H. Networked process: Dissolving boundaries of process and post-process. Parlor Press, West Lafayette, IN, 2007.
 
11
Turnley, M. Contextualized design: Teaching critical approaches to web authoring through redesign projects. Computers and Composition, 22, 131--148.
 
12
Sun, H. The triumph of users: Achieving cultural usability goals with user localization. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15, 457--481.
 
13
Berlin, J. A. Contemporary composition: The major pedagogical theories. College Composition and Communication, 44, 765--777.
 
14
Postman, N. The end of education: Redefining the value of school. Knopf, New York, 1995.
 
15
Kress, G. "English" at the crossroads: Rethinking curricula of communication in the context of the turn to the visual. In G. E. Hawisher and C. L. Selfe (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies, and 21st century technologies (pp. 66--88). Utah State University Press, Logan, UT, 1999.
 
16
Wysocki, A. F. Opening new media to writing: Openings and justifications. In A. F. Wysocki, J. Johnson-Eilola, C. L. Selfe, and G. Sirc (Eds.), Writing new media: Theory and applications for expanding the teaching of composition (pp. 1--41). Utah State University Press, Logan, UT, 2004.
 
17
Lockton, D. Architectures of control in the digital environment. Retrieved May 10, 2007, from Fulminate // Architectures of Control Web site: http:architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=5
 
18
Feenberg, A. Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford University Press, 2002.
 
19
Idrus, R. M., and McComas, K. Technogogy: Facilitating the transformation of learning. Special Issue of the Journal of the Computer, the Internet, and Management, 14 (SP1), 5.1--5.9.
 
20
Fox, C. W., and Wolf, J. B. (Eds.). Evolutionary genetics: Concepts and case studies. Oxford University Press, 2006.
 
21
Coyne, J. A., and Orr, H. A. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 2004.
 
22
Dawkins, R. The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, 1976.
 
23
Blackmore, S. J. The meme machine. Oxford University Press, 1999.
 
24
 
25
Johnson-Eilola, J. Accumulation, circulation, and association: Economies of information in online spaces. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 38, 228--238.
 
26
Simmons, W. M., and Grabill, J. T. Toward a civic rhetoric for technologically and scientifically complex places: Invention, performance, and participation. College Composition and Communication, 58, 419--448.