ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Designing protocols for agent institutions
Full text PdfPdf (163 KB)
Source
International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
Honolulu, Hawaii
SESSION: Communications and commitments: poster papers table of contents
Article No. 31  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-81-904262-7-5
Authors
Huib Aldewereld  Utrecht University, The Netherlands
Frank Dignum  Utrecht University, The Netherlands
John-Jules Ch. Meyer  Utrecht University, The Netherlands
Sponsor
: IFAAMAS
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 49,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1329125.1329163
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Agent-mediated institutions (or e-institutions), introduced in [9], are open agent systems that allow heterogeneous agents to enter and perform tasks. The e-institutions specify the admissible behaviour of the agents by means of norms, which are declarative and abstract by nature. On the one hand this allows for a stable specification suitable for almost any conceivable situation that arises in the institution, but in the other hand the norms hardly give any indication which interaction patterns would guarantee satisfaction of the norms.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
H. Aldewereld. Autonomy vs. Conformity: an Institutional Perspective on Norms and Protocols. PhD thesis, Universiteit Utrecht, 2007.
 
2
H. Aldewereld, F. Dignum, J.-J. Meyer, and J. Vázquez-Salceda. Proving norm compliancy of protocols in electronic institutions. Technical Report UU-CS-2005-010, Utrecht University, 2005.
 
3
H. Aldewereld, D. Grossi, J. Vázquez-Salceda, and F. Dignum. Designing normative behaviour via landmarks. In O. Bossier. et.al., editor, Coordination, Organisation, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems I, pages 150--162. Springer-Verlag, 2006.
 
4
N. Belnap and M. Perloff. Seeing to it that: a canonical form for agentives. Theoria, 54:175--199, 1988.
 
5
V. Dignum. A Model for Organizational Interaction: Based on Agents, Founded in Logic. PhD thesis, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2004.
 
6
 
7
S. Kumar, M. J. Huber, P. R. Cohen, and D. McGee. Toward a formalism for conversation protocols using joint intention theory. Computational Intelligence, 18(2):174--228, 2002.
 
8
F. López y Lopez, M. Luck, and M. d'Inverno. A framework for norm-based inter-agent dependence. In Proceedings of the 3rd Mexican International Conference on Computer Science, pages 31--40. SMCC-INEGI, 2001.
 
9
J. Rodriguez. On the Design and Construction of Agent-mediated Electronic Institutions. PhD thesis, Inst. d'Investigació en Intel.ligència Artificial, 2001.
 
10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Huib Aldewereld: colleagues
Frank Dignum: colleagues
John-Jules Ch. Meyer: colleagues